Nort kazino je konfiskovao 3.217 evra dobitaka ostvarenih tokom mog bonusa na 3. depozit, navodeći kao razlog kršenje koje se dogodilo tokom mog bonusa na 2. depozit — posebnog, prethodnog bonusa.
Činjenice nisu sporne:
Navodno kršenje se dogodilo tokom mog bonusa na drugi depozit
Moj dobitak od 3.217 evra je u potpunosti generisan tokom mog bonusa na 3. depozit.
Kazino nije tvrdio da je prekršio uslove bonusa na treći depozit.
Nisam postavio/la nijednu opkladu koja je prekršila bilo koja pravila tokom bonusa na 3. depozit
Stav kazina je da kršenje jednog bonusa može poništiti dobitke od bilo kog budućeg bonusa, na neodređeno vreme. Nisu naveli nikakvu konkretnu klauzulu koja to odobrava. Kada su više puta zamoljeni da navedu tačnu klauzulu o uslovima i odredbama i formulaciju, odgovorili su samo sa opštim parafrazama politike.
Kontradikcija u njihovoj sopstvenoj prepisci: U jednom od njihovih imejlova, menadžer za podršku me je savetovao: „Da bismo izbegli slične situacije u budućnosti, ljubazno preporučujemo da osigurate da sve opklade ostanu u okviru dozvoljenih ograničenja dok je bonus aktivan." Fraza „dok je bonus aktivan" direktno implicira da se pravila primenjuju za svaki bonus ponaosob — ne na sve buduće bonuse unedogled.
Šta zahtevam: Ponovno aktiviranje i isplata mojih 3.217 evra dobitaka od bonusa na 3. depozit, koji su generisani bez ikakvog kršenja važećih uslova.
North Casino has confiscated €3,217 in winnings generated during my 3rd Deposit Bonus, citing a breach that occurred during my 2nd Deposit Bonus — a separate, prior bonus.
The facts are not in dispute:
The alleged breach occurred during my 2nd Deposit Bonus
My winnings of €3,217 were generated entirely during my 3rd Deposit Bonus
The casino has not alleged any breach of the 3rd Deposit Bonus terms
I placed no bets that violated any rules during the 3rd Deposit Bonus
The casino's position is that a breach in one bonus can void winnings from any future bonus, indefinitely. They have cited no specific clause authorising this. When asked repeatedly to provide the exact T&C clause and wording, they have responded only with general paraphrases of policy.
The contradiction in their own correspondence: In one of their emails, a support manager advised me: "To avoid similar situations in the future, we kindly recommend ensuring that all bets remain within the allowed limits while a bonus is active." The phrase "while a bonus is active" directly implies the rules apply per bonus — not across all future bonuses indefinitely.
What I am requesting: Reinstatement and payment of my €3,217 in winnings from the 3rd Deposit Bonus, which were generated without any breach of the applicable terms.
Automatski prevedeno: