Nova88 odbija da mi vrati depozit od 1.200 MYR nakon spora oko EDD-a
Podnosim ovu žalbu protiv kompanije Nova88 u vezi sa odbijanjem vraćanja mojih uplaćenih sredstava od 1.200 MYR (približno 280 USDT).
Depoziti su izvršeni u USDT (Tether), dok je moj Nova88 račun bio denominiran u MYR.
Nova88 je izabrala moj nalog za proširenu dužnu pažnju jer valuta/tržište MYR izabrano tokom registracije nije odgovaralo informacijama povezanim sa mojim nalogom.
Problem je što nikada nisam tvrdio da sam Malezijac. Ne živim niti radim u Maleziji, i nikada nisam drugačije izjavio.
Nova88 je tražila dokumentaciju o prebivalištu/zaposlenju u Maleziji. Objasnio sam da ne mogu da dostavim dokumenta koja ne postoje jer nisam stanovnik ili zaposleni u Maleziji.
Nova88 je ovo priznala i eksplicitno potvrdila da razume moju situaciju. Međutim, takođe su mi rekli da nije dostupan alternativni postupak verifikacije.
Nisam odbio KYC/EDD. Više puta sam izjavio da sam spreman da potvrdim svoj identitet, prebivalište i izvor sredstava koristeći originalne dokumente.
Ipak, Nova88 je suspendovala nalog jer njihovi specifični zahtevi za direktan debit nisu mogli biti ispunjeni.
Onda sam pitao šta će se desiti sa mojim deponovanim sredstvima.
Na kraju su potvrdili da je moj zahtev za vraćanje preostalih 1.200 MYR (približno 280 USDT) odbijen i da je odluka konačna.
Ono što me najviše brine jeste to što Nova88 nikada nije utvrdila nikakvo posebno kršenje pravila klađenja. U stvari, eksplicitno su mi pismeno rekli:
„U ovoj prepisci ne navodimo da je postojao poseban utvrđeni slučaj zloupotrebe sistema, koordinisanog klađenja ili drugih zabranjenih aktivnosti klađenja."
Dakle, ovo nije slučaj u kojem su me optužili za prevaru ili varanje i konfiskovali dobitke. Odbijaju da mi vrate deponovana sredstva, koja su deponovana u USDT-u, jer njihov EDD proces nije mogao biti završen, dok istovremeno priznaju da ne mogu da dostavim malezijske dokumente koje su tražili i da nemaju alternativni proces verifikacije.
Više puta sam ih tražio da mi dostave tačnu klauzulu o uslovima i odredbama koja odobrava trajno zadržavanje/konfiskaciju mojih deponovanih sredstava u ovoj situaciji. Samo su me generalno uputili na njihove odredbe o suspenziji i sprečavanju pranja novca/poznavanja klijenta.
Želeo bih da Casino Guru pregleda da li je ponašanje Nova88 u skladu sa objavljenim uslovima i fer praksama kockanja.
Imam kompletnu imejl prepisku i mogu da pružim snimke ekrana/dokumente koji prikazuju celu vremensku liniju.
Sporni iznos: 1.200 MYR (približno 280 USDT).
Originalni depoziti: USDT (Tether).
Tražim povraćaj mojih uplaćenih sredstava.
Nova88 Refuses to Return My 1,200 MYR Deposit After EDD Dispute
I am filing this complaint against Nova88 regarding the refusal to return my deposited funds of 1,200 MYR (approximately 280 USDT).
The deposits were made in USDT (Tether), while my Nova88 account was denominated in MYR.
Nova88 selected my account for Enhanced Due Diligence because the MYR currency/market selected during registration did not correspond with the information associated with my account.
The problem is that I have never claimed to be Malaysian. I do not live or work in Malaysia, and I never stated otherwise.
Nova88 requested Malaysian residence/employment documentation. I explained that I cannot provide documents that do not exist because I am not a Malaysian resident or employee.
Nova88 acknowledged this and explicitly confirmed that they understood my situation. However, they also told me that there was no alternative verification process available.
I did not refuse KYC/EDD. I repeatedly stated that I was willing to verify my identity, residence and source of funds using genuine documents.
Nevertheless, Nova88 suspended the account because their specific EDD requirements could not be completed.
I then asked what would happen to my deposited funds.
They eventually confirmed that my request to return the remaining 1,200 MYR (approximately 280 USDT) was declined and that the decision was final.
What concerns me most is that Nova88 never established any separate betting violation. In fact, they explicitly told me in writing:
"We are not stating in this correspondence that there has been a separate finding of system abuse, coordinated betting, or other prohibited betting activity."
So this is not a case where they have accused me of fraud or cheating and confiscated winnings. They are refusing to return my deposited funds, which were deposited in USDT, because their EDD process could not be completed, while simultaneously acknowledging that I cannot provide the Malaysian documents they requested and that they have no alternative verification process.
I repeatedly asked them to provide the exact T&C clause authorizing permanent retention/confiscation of my deposited funds in this situation. They only referred me generally to their suspension and AML/KYC provisions.
I would like Casino Guru to review whether Nova88's conduct is consistent with its published terms and fair gambling practices.
I have the complete email correspondence and can provide screenshots/documents showing the entire timeline.
Amount disputed: 1,200 MYR (approximately 280 USDT).
Original deposits: USDT (Tether).
I am requesting the return of my deposited funds.
Automatski prevedeno: