Draga Veronika,
Hvala vam na vašoj recenziji. Međutim, moram snažno da odbacim implicitu da sam odlučio da napravim „četvoronedeljnu pauzu" ili da nisam potvrdio trajno zatvaranje naloga. Činjenični vremenski okvir i regulatorne obaveze operatera govore potpuno drugačiju priču:
Eksplicitni okidač 24/25. marta 2026:
Moj prvi zahtev 24. marta bio je jasan, nedvosmislen i apsolutan: „Nedavno sam izgubio toliko novca. Duboko sam uznemiren i umoran od kockanja, ono mi izaziva toliko stresa u životu i želim da zauvek zatvorim svoj račun."
Prema standardnim propisima o odgovornom kockanju i austrijskom Zakonu o kockanju (GSpG), operater je zakonski obavezan da tretira eksplicitnu izjavu o psihološkoj i finansijskoj nevolji kao trenutni okidač za trajno samoisključenje. Kazino nije imao pravo da ignoriše zahtev za pomoć, da ga tretira kao pregovore bez roka ili da privremeno „deaktivira" moj nalog zato što su odlučili da pošalju imejl sa obaveštenjem o zastoju.
Iskorišćavanje perioda odugovlačenja u kazinu:
Pošto kazino namerno nije izvršio moj zahtev za trajno zatvaranje 25. marta, ostavili su mi račun otvorenim i aktivno prihvatili dodatnih 55.056,46 evra putem 46 odvojenih transakcija depozita od samoproglašenog igrača u nevolji.
Ponovljeni naknadni zahtevi za zatvaranje:
Da odgovorim na vaše drugo pitanje: ne, nisam to pomenuo samo jednom. Tokom narednih nedelja, morao sam više puta da ih jurim preko više zahteva za podršku (#47030076 i #49374020) moleći ih da prestanu da uzimaju moj novac:
5. maj: Ponovo je zahtevano zatvaranje računa.
6. maj: VIP menadžer Sakis je ignorisao zahtev i pitao za razloge. Odmah sam odgovorio: „Molim vas, zatvorite mi nalog."
7. maj: Eskalirao sam najoštrijim rečima: „Zahtevam da mi odmah zatvorite nalog. Molim vas, zatvorite mi nalog, hvala."
8. maj: Ponovo sam napisao: „Molim vas, zatvorite mi nalog."
Nezakoniti finansijski podsticaji:
Umesto da mi zatvori nalog nakon ovih ponovljenih molbi, VIP menadžer Sakis mi je ponudio bonus od 50 evra kao podsticaj da nastavim da se kockam. Nuđenje finansijskih bonusa klijentu koji je eksplicitno otkrio psihološke tegobe i zahtevao zatvaranje naloga je ozbiljno kršenje propisa.
Nisam želeo pauzu i nikada nisam pristao na pauzu. Zatražio sam trajno zatvaranje zbog finansijskih problema, što je kazino ignorisao da bi profitirao od mojih gubitaka. Očekujem da će Casino Guru pozvati ovog operatera na odgovornost u skladu sa standardnim pravilima zaštite igrača.
Srdačan pozdrav,
David
Dear Veronika,
Thank you for your review. However, I must strongly reject the implication that I chose to take a "four-week break" or failed to confirm my permanent account closure. The factual timeline and the operator's regulatory obligations tell a completely different story:
The Explicit Trigger on 24/25 March 2026:
My first request on 24 March was clear, unambiguous, and absolute: "I lost so much money recently. I am deeply distressed and tired of gambling, it's causing me so much stress in my life, and I want to close my account forever."
Under standard responsible gambling regulations and the Austrian Gambling Act (GSpG), an operator is legally required to treat an explicit declaration of psychological and financial distress as an immediate trigger for permanent self-exclusion. The casino did not have the right to ignore a distress plea, treat it as an open-ended negotiation, or default my account into a temporary "break" because they decided to send a stall email.
The Casino's Exploitation of the Stalling Period:
Because the casino willfully failed to execute my permanent closure request on 25 March, they left my account open and actively accepted an additional €55,056.46 across 46 separate deposit transactions from a self-declared distressed player.
Repeated Subsequent Demands for Closure:
To answer your second question: no, I did not just mention it once. Over the course of the following weeks, I had to repeatedly chase them down across multiple support tickets (#47030076 and #49374020) begging them to stop taking my money:
5 May: Demanded account closure again.
6 May: VIP Manager Sakis ignored the request and asked for reasons. I replied immediately: "close my account please."
7 May: I escalated in the strongest terms: "I demand you close my account now. Please close my account, thanks."
8 May: I wrote again: "Please close my account."
Illegal Financial Inducements:
Instead of closing my account after these repeated pleas, VIP Manager Sakis offered me a €50 cash bonus as an inducement to keep gambling. Offering financial bonuses to a client who has explicitly disclosed psychological distress and demanded account closure is a severe regulatory violation.
I did not want a break, and I never consented to a break. I requested a permanent closure due to distress, which the casino ignored to profit from my losses. I expect Casino Guru to hold this operator accountable to standard player protection rules.
Best regards,
David
Automatski prevedeno: