Osvojio sam približno 21.000 kanadskih dolara u kazino igrama (ne u kladionici) na Rainbet-u i zatražio isplatu. Korisnička podrška me je zamolila da završim dodatnu KYC verifikaciju, uključujući izvod iz banke (PDF) i video snimak moje bankarske aplikacije. Prvobitno mi je naloženo da ih otpremim putem javne veb stranice za deljenje video snimaka (Streamable), što sam odbio zbog zabrinutosti za privatnost i bezbednost.
Poslao/la sam traženi izvod iz banke i video sa redigovanim ličnim podacima — sakrio/la sam broj svog računa, nepovezane transakcije i stanje na računu, dok sam istovremeno držao/la svoje ime, bankovni račun i relevantnu transakciju potpuno vidljivim, dovoljnim za potvrdu identiteta i vlasništva nad računom. Korisnička podrška je odbila ove dokumente, navodeći da redigovanje „nije prihvatljivo" i da „sve informacije" moraju biti „prikazane na samom dokumentu", bez navođenja bilo kakve konkretne politike.
Pregledao sam objavljene Uslove i odredbe kompanije Rainbet i stranicu o sprečavanju pranja novca i nisam pronašao zahtev da se dokumenti dostavljaju neredigovani. Kada sam zamoljen za pojašnjenje, podrška je dala tri različita, nedosledna obrazloženja u nekoliko poruka: prvo da je to „u skladu sa našim uslovima i odredbama" (nije navedena klauzula), zatim da je to „standardna procedura koju zahteva banka" (moja banka nema ulogu u zahtevima za internu verifikaciju treće strane), i na kraju da je to zahtevao Gigadat (njihov procesor plaćanja) zbog „nepoklapanja u nekim od prethodno dostavljenih informacija".
Kada sam zamolio podršku da identifikuje konkretnu transakciju ili iznos koji je potrebno upariti, nisam dobio jasan odgovor. Samostalno sam identifikovao verovatnu transakciju koja se podudara na izvodu iz banke (e-transfer kompanije Gigadat Inc., referenca FCDH27, datiran 3 dana nakon datuma interne transakcije kompanije Rainbet — što je u skladu sa normalnim kašnjenjem u obradi) i ponudio da to potvrdim, ali podrška nije angažovala oko detalja.
Takođe sam poslao imejl menadžerskoj kontakt osobi kompanije Rainbet (kako je naložila podrška) tražeći pojašnjenje istih tačaka i nisam dobio nikakav odgovor nakon 3-4 radna dana.
Podrška je od tada izjavila: „Moraćete da nam dostavite izvod iz banke koji pokriva poslednjih 30 dana. Nažalost, ova odluka je konačna i naše odeljenje je ne može promeniti", bez odgovora na bilo koje od mojih konkretnih pitanja o neslaganju transakcija ili osnovu za zahtevanje neredigovanih dokumenata. Uslovi korišćenja usluge kompanije Rainbet (20.1) navode da mogu ograničiti isplate i pristup sredstvima ako se verifikacija ne završi u roku od 72 sata, što, koliko razumem, dovodi moj nalog u opasnost od zaključavanja uprkos mojoj kontinuiranoj saradnji u dobroj veri.
Spreman/na sam da pružim razumnu dokumentaciju kako bih potvrdio/la svoj identitet i vlasništvo nad nalogom, što sam više puta i učinio/la, ali mi nije prijatno da pružim potpuno neredigovani broj bankovnog računa i neredigovani video snimak s obzirom na promenljiva, neutemeljena opravdanja koja sam dobio/la. Tražim pomoć u rešavanju ovog problema sa povlačenjem sredstava.
I won approximately $21,000 CAD in casino games (not sportsbook) on Rainbet and requested a withdrawal. Support asked me to complete additional KYC verification, including a bank statement (PDF) and a video recording of my banking app. I was initially instructed to upload these via a public video-sharing site (Streamable), which I declined due to privacy and security concerns.
I submitted the requested bank statement and video with personal information redacted — I covered my account number, unrelated transactions, and balance, while keeping my name, bank, and the relevant transaction fully visible, sufficient to confirm identity and account ownership. Support rejected these documents, stating redaction was "not acceptable" and that "all information" must be "displayed on the document itself," without citing any specific policy.
I reviewed Rainbet's published Terms & Conditions and AML page and found no requirement for documents to be submitted unredacted. When asked to clarify, support gave three different, inconsistent justifications over several messages: first that it was "in accordance with our terms and conditions" (no clause cited), then that it was "standard procedure required by the bank" (my bank has no role in a third party's internal verification requirements), and then that it was required by Gigadat (their payment processor) due to a "mismatch in some of the information previously provided."
When I asked support to identify the specific transaction or amount that needed to be matched, I was not given a clear answer. I independently identified the likely matching transaction on my bank statement (a Gigadat Inc. e-transfer, reference FCDH27, dated 3 days after Rainbet's internal transaction date — consistent with normal processing delay) and offered to confirm this, but support did not engage with the specifics.
I also emailed Rainbet's manager contact (as directed by support) requesting clarification on the same points and received no response after 3-4 business days.
Support has since stated: "You will need to provide us with your bank statement covering the last 30 days. Unfortunately, this decision is final and cannot be changed by our department," without addressing any of my specific questions about the transaction mismatch or the basis for requiring unredacted documents. Rainbet's own Terms of Service (20.1) state they may restrict withdrawals and access to funds if verification is not completed within 72 hours, which I understand puts my account at risk of being locked despite my continued good-faith cooperation.
I am willing to provide reasonable documentation to confirm my identity and account ownership, and have done so repeatedly, but I am not comfortable providing a fully unredacted bank account number and unredacted video given the shifting, unsubstantiated justifications I've received. I'm requesting help resolving this withdrawal.
Automatski prevedeno: