Predmet: Neuspeh samoisključivanja, ponovna aktivacija naloga i prihvatanje depozita nakon zatvaranja
Kazino: Realz Casino
Tražim pomoć u vezi sa sporom sa kazinom Realz u vezi sa obradom mog zahteva za samoisključenje i naknadnim funkcionisanjem mog naloga.
Vremenska linija
Dana 13. marta 2026. godine, zatražio/la sam da se moj nalog samoisključi/zatvori.
Dana 17. marta 2026. godine, Realz je potvrdio da je moj nalog zatvoren.
Uprkos ovoj potvrdi, moj nalog je kasnije ponovo aktiviran bez mog pristanka ili znanja.
Dana 24. maja 2026. godine, kontaktirao sam Realz da se požalim da je moj nalog ponovo otvoren nakon zatvaranja.
Dana 29. maja 2026. godine, Realz je ponovo potvrdio da je moj nalog zatvoren, što ukazuje da je potrebno drugo zatvaranje.
Nakon mojih zahteva za samoisključenje i zatvaranje, nastavio sam da primam promotivne imejlove i bonus ponude koje podstiču kockarske aktivnosti.
Moj račun je ostao dostupan, a depoziti su prihvaćeni čak i nakon što je račun trebalo da ostane zatvoren.
Procenjujem da sam pretrpeo gubitak od oko 1.000 novozelandskih dolara nakon što je račun trebalo da ostane isključen.
Moja žalba
Moja žalba se ne odnosi samo na gubitke od kockanja. Moja zabrinutost je da Realz nije pravilno održao moje samoisključenje i dozvolio je kontinuirani pristup uslugama kockanja nakon što je potvrdio da je nalog zatvoren.
Verujem da je potrebno preispitati sledeća pitanja:
Zašto je moj nalog ponovo aktiviran nakon zatvaranja?
Koji dokazi postoje da sam zahtevao ili odobrio ponovnu aktivaciju?
Zašto su mi poslati promotivni imejlovi i bonus ponude nakon mog samoisključenja i zatvaranja naloga?
Zašto su depoziti prihvaćeni nakon što je račun trebalo da ostane zatvoren?
Pokušaji rešavanja
Izneo sam ove nedoumice direktno kazinu Realz i zatražio pregled.
Kazino je odbio moju žalbu i izjavio da se depoziti korišćeni za klađenje ne vraćaju. Međutim, odgovor nije pomenuo ponovno otvaranje naloga, kontinuirane marketinške komunikacije ili osnovu na kojoj je nalog ponovo postao aktivan.
Zahtevano rešenje
Zahtevam da kazino Realz:
Dajte mi potpuno objašnjenje u vezi sa ponovnom aktivacijom mog naloga.
Objasnite zašto su promotivne komunikacije poslate nakon samoisključenja.
Pregledajte gubitke nastale nakon što je račun trebalo da ostane zatvoren.
Obezbedite pravedno rešenje na osnovu okolnosti.
Dostupni dokazi
Mogu da obezbedim:
Zahtev za samoisključenje od 13. marta 2026. godine.
Potvrda o zatvaranju računa od 17. marta 2026. godine.
Prepiska u vezi sa ponovnom aktivacijom naloga.
Druga potvrda zatvaranja od 29. maja 2026. godine.
Promotivne e-poruke i bonus ponude primljene nakon zatvaranja.
Evidencija o depozitima i transakcijama.
Konačni odgovor kazina na žalbu.
Hvala vam na pomoći.
Bagvant Sing
Subject: Self-Exclusion Failure, Account Reactivation, and Acceptance of Deposits After Closure
Casino: Realz Casino
I am requesting assistance regarding a dispute with Realz Casino concerning the handling of my self-exclusion request and the subsequent operation of my account.
Timeline
On 13 March 2026, I requested that my account be self-excluded/closed.
On 17 March 2026, Realz confirmed that my account had been closed.
Despite this confirmation, my account was later reactivated without my consent or knowledge.
On 24 May 2026, I contacted Realz to complain that my account had been reopened after closure.
On 29 May 2026, Realz again confirmed that my account had been closed, indicating that a second closure was required.
After my self-exclusion and closure requests, I continued receiving promotional emails and bonus offers encouraging gambling activity.
My account remained accessible, and deposits were accepted after the account should have remained closed.
I estimate that I incurred approximately NZ$1,000 in losses after the account should have remained excluded.
My Complaint
My complaint is not simply about gambling losses. My concern is that Realz failed to properly maintain my self-exclusion and allowed continued access to gambling services after confirming that the account had been closed.
I believe the following issues require review:
Why was my account reactivated after closure?
What evidence exists that I requested or authorised reactivation?
Why were promotional emails and bonus offers sent after my self-exclusion and account closure?
Why were deposits accepted after the account should have remained closed?
Attempts to Resolve
I raised these concerns directly with Realz Casino and requested a review.
The casino rejected my complaint and stated that deposits used for betting are not refundable. However, the response did not address the reopening of the account, the continued marketing communications, or the basis on which the account became active again.
Resolution Requested
I request that Realz Casino:
Provide a full explanation regarding the reactivation of my account.
Explain why promotional communications were sent after self-exclusion.
Review the losses incurred after the account should have remained closed.
Provide a fair resolution based on the circumstances.
Evidence Available
I can provide:
Self-exclusion request dated 13 March 2026.
Account closure confirmation dated 17 March 2026.
Correspondence regarding account reactivation.
Second closure confirmation dated 29 May 2026.
Promotional emails and bonus offers received after closure.
Deposit and transaction records.
The casino’s final complaint response.
Thank you for your assistance.
Bhagwant Singh
Automatski prevedeno: