Hvala vam na odgovoru.
Razumem vašu frustraciju zbog situacije. Međutim, da bismo procenili da li je došlo do kršenja procedura odgovornog kockanja, moramo da proverimo da li je vaš prvobitni zahtev za zatvaranje naloga podnet posebno zbog zavisnosti od kockanja ili zabrinutosti vezane za kockanje.
Trenutno imamo pristup samo komunikaciji od 28. februara, gde ste zahtevali da se nalog ponovo zatvori nakon što je već bio ponovo otvoren. Na osnovu dostavljenih imejlova, kazino je brzo odgovorio na vaš zahtev i vaš nalog je blokiran istog dana. Zbog toga trenutno ne vidimo dokaze o kršenju propisa o odgovornom kockanju u vezi sa tim zahtevom.
Nažalost, bez originalnog zahteva za samoisključenje, nismo u mogućnosti da potvrdimo pod kojim okolnostima je vaš nalog prvobitno zatvoren, da li je zavisnost od kockanja eksplicitno pomenuta ili da li kazino u to vreme nije primenio trajna ograničenja odgovornog kockanja.
Za sada, na osnovu raspoloživih dokaza, nismo u mogućnosti da zaključimo da je kazino postupao protiv principa odgovornog kockanja ili da depoziti uplaćeni 28. februara treba da budu vraćeni.
Thank you for your reply.
I understand your frustration regarding the situation. However, in order for us to assess whether there was a breach of responsible gambling procedures, we need to verify that your original account closure request was specifically made due to gambling addiction or gambling-related concerns.
At the moment, we only have access to the communication from February 28, where you requested the account to be closed again after it had already been reopened. Based on the emails provided, the casino responded to your request promptly and your account was blocked on the same day. Because of this, we currently do not see evidence of a responsible gambling breach in relation to that request.
Unfortunately, without the original self-exclusion request, we are unable to confirm under what circumstances your account was initially closed, whether gambling addiction was explicitly mentioned, or whether the casino failed to apply permanent responsible gambling restrictions at that time.
For now, based on the available evidence, we are unable to conclude that the casino acted against responsible gambling principles or that the deposits made on February 28 should be refunded.
Automatski prevedeno: