Osporavam odluku Ričard kazina da primeni maksimalni limit isplate iz promocije besplatnih okretaja utorkom na dobitke koji su generisani nakon što je izvršen poseban depozit bez ikakvog bonusa.
Prvobitno sam iskoristio promociju besplatnih okretaja utorkom i ispunio sve uslove klađenja povezane sa tom promocijom. Nakon što sam ispunio uslove klađenja, bonus sredstva su konvertovana u gotovinu.
U tom trenutku:
- Uslov za klađenje je bio u potpunosti ispunjen.
- Bonus je bio pretvoren u gotovinu.
- Nije preostao nijedan aktivni zahtev za klađenje.
Zatim sam napravio potpuno poseban depozit koristeći sopstvena sredstva i nisam aktivirao nikakav bonus ili promotivnu ponudu.
Nakon što sam uplatio ovaj depozit, nastavio sam da igram i naknadno osvojio približno 2.700 australijskih dolara.
Kada sam kasnije zatražio povlačenje novca, Ričard kazino je primenio maksimalni limit isplate za besplatne okrete utorkom od 150 AUD i konfiskovao preostali dobitak.
Stav kazina je da, zato što je AUD
Preostali iznos na mom stanju potiče od završene promocije besplatnih okretaja, kasniji depozit je stvorio ono što oni opisuju kao „mešoviti saldo". Oni navode da kada se sredstva pomešaju, saldo ostaje povezano sa originalnom promocijom i stoga ostaje podložno maksimalnom ograničenju isplate iz te promocije.
Više puta sam tražio od Ričard kazina da identifikuje tačnu klauzulu u svojim Uslovima i odredbama koja izričito navodi:
Naknadni depozit gotovine podleže prethodno ostvarenom bonusu.
Dobici ostvareni kasnijim depozitom koji nije bonus smatraju se bonus dobicima.
Maksimalni limit isplate iz završene promocije besplatnih okretaja nastavlja da važi nakon što je klađenje završeno i bonus konvertovan u novac.
Uprkos nekoliko zahteva, kazino nije identifikovao konkretnu ugovornu klauzulu koja to jasno navodi. Umesto toga, više puta su objasnili kako njihov sistem tretira „mešovite fondove".
Jedina potkrepljujuća formulacija koju je dao kazino navodi:
„Da bi se održao integritet igre i sprečile potencijalne sistemske promene balansa, igračima se savetuje da koriste isključivo ili prava sredstva ili bonus sredstva tokom jedne igračke sesije, umesto da kombinuju oba."
Po mom mišljenju, ova formulacija savetuje igračima da ne kombinuju salda, ali ne navodi jasno da dobici ostvareni od kasnijeg depozita koji nije bonus ostaju podložni maksimalnom ograničenju isplate završene promocije besplatnih okretaja.
Ne sporim da promocija besplatnih okretaja utorkom ima maksimalni limit za isplatu. Sporim primenu tog ograničenja na dobitke ostvarene nakon:
Uslovi za klađenje su ispunjeni.
Bonus je konvertovan u gotovinu.
Poseban depozit je izvršen bez ikakvog bonusa.
Zahtevam nezavisnu proveru da li je Ričard kazino ispravno primenio maksimalno ograničenje isplate besplatnih okretaja utorkom na dobitke generisane nakon naknadnog depozita koji nije bonus, i zahtevam da kazino identifikuje tačnu ugovornu klauzulu na koju se oslanjao prilikom oduzimanja dobitaka.
Ukupan iznos koji su konfiskovali bio je 2550 dolara
am disputing Richard Casino’s decision to apply the maximum cashout limit from a Tuesday Free Spins promotion to winnings that were generated after a separate deposit was made without any bonus attached.
I initially claimed the Tuesday Free Spins promotion and completed all wagering requirements associated with that promotion. After completing the wagering requirements, the bonus funds converted to cash
At that point:
- The wagering requirement had been fully completed.
- The bonus had converted to cash.
- There was no active wagering requirement remaining.
I then made a completely separate deposit using my own funds and did not activate any bonus or promotional offer.
After making this deposit, I continued playing and subsequently won approximately AUD $2,700.
When I later requested a withdrawal, Richard Casino applied the Tuesday Free Spins maximum cashout limit of AUD $150 and confiscated the remaining winnings.
The casino’s position is that because the AUD
remaining on my balance originated from the completed free spins promotion, the later deposit created what they describe as a "mixed balance." They state that once funds are mixed, the balance remains linked to the original promotion and therefore remains subject to the maximum cashout limit from that promotion.
I have repeatedly asked Richard Casino to identify the exact clause in their Terms and Conditions that expressly states:
A subsequent cash deposit becomes subject to a previously completed bonus.
Winnings generated from a later non-bonus deposit are deemed bonus winnings.
The maximum cashout limit from a completed free spins promotion continues to apply after wagering has been completed and the bonus has converted to cash.
Despite several requests, the casino has not identified a specific contractual clause that clearly states this. Instead, they have repeatedly explained how their system treats "mixed funds."
The only supporting wording provided by the casino states:
"To maintain the integrity of gameplay and prevent potential system-initiated balance adjustments, players are advised to use either real funds or bonus funds exclusively during a single gaming session, rather than combining both."
In my view, this wording advises players not to combine balances but does not clearly state that winnings generated from a later non-bonus deposit remain subject to the maximum cashout restriction of a completed free spins promotion.
I am not disputing that the Tuesday Free Spins promotion has a maximum cashout limit. I am disputing the application of that limit to winnings generated after:
The wagering requirements were completed.
The bonus converted to cash.
A separate deposit was made without any bonus attached.
I am requesting an independent review of whether Richard Casino correctly applied the Tuesday Free Spins maximum cashout limit to winnings generated after a subsequent non-bonus deposit, and I request that the casino identify the exact contractual clause relied upon when confiscating the winnings.
total amount they confiscated was $2550
Automatski prevedeno: