Dragi Mateje,
Nadam se da imate divan dan.
Hvala vam puno na kontinuiranoj podršci i što ste pažljivo pregledali PDF datoteku. Olakšalo mi je što čujem da je obrazac koji sam poslao zaista ispravno popunjen i da je problem nastao zbog tehničkog problema sa prikazom prilikom otvaranja u određenim pregledačima. Hvala vam što ste prosledili snimke ekrana i zamolili kazino da ovo ponovo proveri.
Uz to rečeno, moram da pokrenem jednu fundamentalniju zabrinutost:
Kazino nikada nije trebalo da zahteva potpisan PDF obrazac da bi zatvorio moj nalog nakon što sam jasno zatražio trajno samoisključenje zbog zavisnosti od kockanja 30. maja 2025. godine.
Kao što ste s pravom istakli u svojoj prethodnoj poruci, zavisnici od kockanja nemaju kontrolu nad svojim kompulzivnim ponašanjem, a odlaganje zaštitnih mera zbog preteranih formalnosti može dovesti do ozbiljne štete. Upravo se to dogodilo u mom slučaju.
Umesto da mi zatvori nalog ili odmah onemogući depozite i igru, kazino ga je držao potpuno otvorenim — skoro dve nedelje — do 11. juna, kada su reagovali tek nakon vaše intervencije preko Casino Guru-a. Tokom ovog perioda, izgubio sam 2.345 dolara, što je moglo biti potpuno izbegnuto da su preduzete čak i osnovne mere predostrožnosti nakon mog početnog zahteva.
Zahtev za popunjavanjem trostranog PDF obrasca pre pružanja zaštite ne samo da stvara prepreke za ranjive igrače, već – kao što ste s pravom primetili – nije ni industrijski standard i nije usklađen sa vašim Kodeksom o fer kockanju. Prvi put vidim takav pristup i verujem da on stavlja teret na osobu koja je najviše izložena riziku.
Kazino sada priznaje da ažuriraju svoj proces kako bi u takvim slučajevima stavljali naloge u režim samo isplate — što dokazuje da je njihov prethodni pristup bio pogrešan. Takođe, zatvorili su mi nalog kada ste tražili da ga zatvorite i kada je podneta ova žalba.
Iako razumem da kazino možda želi da zadrži dokumentaciju iz pravnih razloga, to ne bi trebalo da bude na štetu bezbednosti igrača. Ispravan postupak bi bio da se odmah zamrzne ili ograniči nalog i sredi papirologija nakon što se osigura da ne može doći do dalje štete.
U svetlu svega ovoga, s poštovanjem molim da se moj zahtev za povraćaj novca od 2.345 dolara (moglo bi biti i više) ozbiljno ponovo razmotri. Preduzeo sam sve razumne korake da zatražim zatvaranje zbog zavisnosti. Upravo je proces kazina – i njegovo kašnjenje – uzrokovao ovaj gubitak.
Hvala vam još jednom što se zalažete za pravednost i radujem se vašoj kontinuiranoj pomoći.
P.S. Još nisam dobio istoriju transakcija.
Dear Matej,
Hope you're having wonderful day.
Thank you very much for your continued support and for carefully reviewing the PDF file. I’m relieved to hear that the form I submitted was indeed filled out correctly, and that the issue arose from a technical display problem when opened in certain browsers. I appreciate you forwarding screenshots and asking the casino to recheck this.
That said, I must raise a more fundamental concern:
The casino should never have required a signed PDF form in order to close my account after I clearly requested permanent self-exclusion due to gambling addiction on May 30, 2025.
As you rightly pointed out in your earlier message, gambling addicts are not in control of their compulsive behaviour, and delaying protective measures due to excessive formalities can lead to serious harm. That is exactly what happened in my case.
Instead of closing my account or disabling deposits and gameplay immediately, the casino kept it fully open—for nearly two weeks—until June 11, when they acted only after your intervention via Casino Guru. During this time, I lost $2,345, which could have been completely avoided if even basic precautionary steps had been taken after my initial request.
The requirement to complete a 3-page PDF form before providing protection not only creates barriers for vulnerable players, but—as you rightly noted—is not industry standard and is not aligned with your Fair Gambling Codex. It’s the first time I’ve seen such an approach, and I believe it places the burden on the person most at risk.
The casino now admits they are updating their process to put accounts in withdrawal-only mode in such cases—proving their previous approach was flawed. Also they closed my account when you asked to close it only and when this complaint raised.
While I understand the casino may wish to keep documentation for legal reasons, that should not come at the expense of player safety. The correct procedure would have been to immediately freeze or restrict the account, and sort out the paperwork after ensuring no further harm could occur.
In light of all this, I respectfully ask that my refund request for $2,345 (could be more) be seriously reconsidered. I took all reasonable steps to request closure due to addiction. It was the casino's process—and its delay—that caused this loss.
Thank you again for standing up for fairness, and I look forward to your continued assistance.
P.S. I haven't received my transactions history yet.
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno: