Dragi tim gurua kazina,
Želeo bih s poštovanjem da podnesem dodatnu izjavu kao odgovor na Slotunin stav i razjasnim nekoliko ključnih tačaka.
Pre svega, želeo bih da istaknem da su u prethodnim sličnim slučajevima, igrači u mojoj istoj situaciji dobici isplaćeni nakon pravedne procene, nakon što su pokazali punu saradnju i iskrenu nameru. Iako razumem da je svaki slučaj jedinstven, smatram da je pravedno uzeti u obzir princip jednakog tretmana i prošle presedane gde su dobici isplaćivani pod sličnim uslovima.
Drugo, trenutno sam potpuno verifikovani VIP igrač u kazinu Frumzi, koji pripada istoj grupi. Uspešno su verifikovali moj identitet, prihvatili moja dokumenta i dosledno isplaćivali moje dobitke bez problema. Ovo jasno dokazuje da moja namera nikada nije bila zlonamerna ili prevarantska, i da je moj identitet autentičan i pouzdan.
Štaviše, iako se Slotuna poziva na posebnu klauzulu kako bi opravdao zadržavanje dobitaka, želeo bih da istaknem da nikada nisam postupio u lošoj veri. Odmah sam ih obavestio o svom pravom imenu, tačnom datumu rođenja, ažuriranoj adresi i potpunom objašnjenju u vezi sa korišćenjem kartice moje supruge. Podneo sam svaki dokument koji su tražili – više puta – i u potpunosti sam sarađivao tokom celog procesa KYC. Ništa nije skriveno. Ništa nije urađeno sa lošom namerom.
Zato s poštovanjem pitam:
Da li bih, da imam bilo kakve nepoštene namere, prošao kroz tako transparentan i potpun proces verifikacije? Da li bih dobrovoljno otkrio sve?
Kako mogu da verujem bilo kom onlajn kazinu nakon takvog iskustva?
Kako je Slotuna mogla da prihvati depozite sa kartice moje žene bez problema, a kasnije da isti taj detalj koristi kao razlog za zadržavanje 8.941 evra dobitka?
Zašto je mali dobitak od 50 evra smatran važećim i isplaćen — a veći dobitak odjednom nevažeći?
Takvo ponašanje jasno pokazuje nedoslednost i, pravno gledano, predstavlja diskriminatorski tretman i značajnu finansijsku štetu. Ako postoji jedno pravilo za male dobitke, a drugo za velike, to otvara vrata potencijalnim kršenjima propisa i pravnim postupcima.
Molim vas da imate u vidu da nameravam da u potpunosti pokrenem ovo pitanje putem svih odgovarajućih regulatornih i pravnih kanala. Postupaću u skladu sa zakonom i uvek ću biti poštovan — ali neću stati dok se ova situacija ne preispita pravedno i ne vrati mi se iznos koji mi s pravom pripada.
Hvala vam na pažnji i kontinuiranoj podršci.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Al******** G.
Dear Casino Guru Team,
I would like to respectfully submit a further statement in response to Slotuna’s position and clarify several crucial points.
First of all, I would like to highlight that in previous similar cases, players in my exact situation have had their winnings paid out after fair assessment, once they demonstrated full cooperation and honest intent. While I understand that each case is unique, I believe it is only fair to take into consideration the principle of equal treatment and past precedents where winnings were paid under similar conditions.
Secondly, I am currently a fully verified VIP player at Frumzi Casino, which belongs to the same group. They have successfully verified my identity, accepted my documents, and consistently paid my winnings without issue. This clearly proves my intent was never malicious or deceitful, and that my identification is genuine and trustworthy.
Furthermore, while Slotuna refers to a specific clause to justify withholding the winnings, I would like to point out that I never acted with bad faith. I immediately informed them of my real name, correct date of birth, updated address, and full explanation regarding the use of my wife’s card. I submitted every single document they requested — multiple times — and I cooperated fully throughout the entire KYC process. Nothing was hidden. Nothing was done with bad intent.
So I respectfully ask:
If I had any dishonest intentions, would I go through such a transparent and complete verification process? Would I voluntarily disclose everything?
How can I trust any online casino after such an experience?
How could Slotuna accept deposits from my wife’s card without issue, but later use that same detail as a reason to withhold €8,941 in winnings?
Why was a small win of €50 considered valid and paid out — but a larger win suddenly invalid?
Such behavior clearly shows inconsistency and, legally speaking, constitutes discriminatory treatment and significant financial harm. If there is one rule for small wins and another for large ones, this opens the door to potential regulatory violations and legal action.
Please be informed that I intend to pursue this matter in full through all appropriate regulatory and legal channels. I will act within the law and remain respectful at all times — but I will not stop until this situation is reviewed fairly and the amount that rightfully belongs to me is returned.
Thank you for your attention and continued support.
Kind regards,
Al******* G.
Automatski prevedeno: