Zdravo Atila,
Hvala vam na odgovoru i što ste razmotrili moj slučaj.
Molim vas pogledajte moje odgovore ispod:
• Da li dobro razumem da su vaši dobici već bili smanjeni na 551 NZD pre nego što su ponovo ograničeni kada ste zahtevali isplatu?
Da, to je tačno. Nakon što sam ispunio uslove za klađenje, moj saldo je smanjen na približno 551 NZD nakon početne korekcije bonusa. Ovaj iznos je prikazan kao „saldo gotovine" i tada sam mogao da nastavim da igram sa ovim sredstvima tokom više sesija. Dalji odbitak od 6.949,30 NZD je primenjen tek kasnije, u fazi pregleda isplate.
• Možete li, molim vas, potvrditi da li dobici potiču od bonusa na depozit od 50 NZD ili od bonusa bez depozita od 20 NZD?
Ovo je jedno od ključnih pitanja u mom slučaju. Kazino je dao suprotstavljena objašnjenja:
U početku su naveli da je odbitak povezan sa bonusom bez depozita od 20 novozelandskih dolara.
Kasnije su izjavili da je to povezano sa bonusom na depozit od 50 NZD (promocija od 200%)
Nedavno su se vratili na pripisivanje bonusa od 20 novozelandskih dolara.
Koliko ja razumem način igre, dobici su generisani nakon što sam uplatio 50 novozelandskih dolara i ispunio uslove klađenja povezane sa tom promocijom. Raniji bonus od 20 novozelandskih dolara je već bio iskorišćen pre ovoga.
• Da li ste u bilo kom trenutku obavešteni da uslovi i odredbe bonusa ostaju na snazi čak i nakon što je ispunjen uslov klađenja?
Ne, nisam bio jasno obavešten o tome u praksi.
Nakon što su ispunjeni uslovi klađenja i stanje smanjeno na približno 551 NZD, sredstva su prikazana kao „stanje gotovine" i bilo mi je dozvoljeno da nastavim slobodno da igram bez ograničenja. Nije bilo naznaka da su ova sredstva i dalje podložna ograničenjima bonusa.
Pored toga, dobio sam poruku marketinškog stila od kazina u kojoj je navedeno da imam sredstva na računu i ohrabreno da nastavim da igram. Ovo me je učvrstilo u razumevanju da je stanje u potpunosti dostupno i da nije ograničeno.
Kazino je takođe izjavio da njihov sistem ne ograničava igranje nakon korekcije bonusa, što mi je omogućilo da nastavim sa klađenjem pod pretpostavkom da su sredstva u potpunosti dostupna.
Generalno, moja glavna briga je sledeća:
Izgleda da su uslovi bonusa primenjeni retrospektivno
Ista sredstva su efikasno ograničena više puta
Obrazloženje za odbitak se menjalo više puta
Bio sam ohrabren da nastavim da igram sa sredstvima koja su predstavljena kao raspoloživa
Nije dat detaljan pregled iznosa od 6.949,30 novozelandskih dolara.
Cenim vašu pomoć u preispitivanju ovog pitanja.
Srdačan pozdrav,
[redigovano]
Hello Attila,
Thank you for your response and for looking into my case.
Please see my answers below:
• Do I understand correctly that your winnings were already reduced to 551 NZD prior to being capped again when you requested a withdrawal?
Yes, that is correct. After completing the wagering requirements, my balance was reduced to approximately 551 NZD following an initial bonus correction. This amount was displayed as "cash balance," and I was then able to continue playing with these funds over multiple sessions. The further deduction of 6,949.30 NZD was only applied later at the withdrawal review stage.
• Could you please confirm whether the winnings originated from the 50 NZD deposit bonus or the 20 NZD no-deposit bonus?
This is one of the key issues in my case. The casino has provided conflicting explanations:
Initially, they stated the deduction was related to a 20 NZD no-deposit bonus
Later, they stated it was related to the 50 NZD deposit bonus (200% promotion)
Most recently, they reverted back to attributing it to the 20 NZD bonus
From my understanding of my gameplay, the winnings were generated after I made a 50 NZD deposit and completed the wagering requirements associated with that promotion. The earlier 20 NZD bonus had already been played through prior to this.
• Were you informed at any point that the bonus terms and conditions remain applicable even after the wagering requirement has been completed?
No, I was not clearly informed of this in practice.
After the wagering requirements were completed and the balance was reduced to approximately 551 NZD, the funds were displayed as "cash balance," and I was allowed to continue playing freely without restriction. There was no indication that these funds were still subject to bonus limitations.
In addition, I received a marketing-style message from the casino stating that I had funds in my account and encouraging me to continue playing. This reinforced my understanding that the balance was fully available and not restricted.
The casino has also stated that their system does not restrict gameplay after bonus correction, which allowed me to continue wagering under the assumption that the funds were fully available.
Overall, my main concern is that:
The bonus terms appear to have been applied retrospectively
The same funds were effectively restricted more than once
The explanation for the deduction has changed multiple times
I was encouraged to continue playing with funds presented as available
No detailed breakdown of the 6,949.30 NZD has been provided
I appreciate your help in reviewing this matter.
Kind regards,
[redacted]
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: