Dragi igračEsp1021,
Hvala vam puno na odgovoru i što ste pružili dodatne detalje u vezi sa vašim slučajem. Veoma mi je žao zbog vašeg iskustva.
Prvo, želeo bih da razjasnim važnu razliku između standardnog zatvaranja naloga i samoisključivanja. Redovno zatvaranje naloga ne sprečava nužno njegovo ponovno otvaranje u budućnosti, dok je samoisključivanje stroža mera koja bi trebalo da spreči svaki dalji pristup, posebno ako je zahtevan zbog zabrinutosti vezanih za kockanje.
U vašem slučaju, pomenuli ste da ste zahtevali trajno zatvaranje naloga zbog akumuliranih gubitaka i da je kazino potvrdio da je nalog zatvoren. Međutim, kasnije ste uspeli da povratite pristup i nastavite da igrate.
Da bih bolje razumeo situaciju, želeo bih da vas zamolim za još nekoliko detalja:
- Možete li pojasniti kako ste tačno zatražili zatvaranje naloga (npr. putem imejla, ćaskanja uživo)?
- Da li ste tada eksplicitno pomenuli probleme sa kockanjem ili zatražili samoisključenje?
- Kada je otprilike 2025. godine podnet ovaj zahtev?
- Kako je vaš nalog ponovo otvoren — da li ste zahtevali ponovnu aktivaciju ili je pristup vraćen bez vaše akcije?
Pomenuli ste da više nemate pristup svom prethodnom imejl nalogu. To je razumljivo. U tom slučaju, molimo vas da nam prosledite svu komunikaciju koju primite od službe za podršku kazina, posebno logove koje ste zahtevali od njih.
Imajte u vidu da ako je nalog samo zatvoren (a ne i samoisključen), kazinu može biti dozvoljeno da ga ponovo otvori na zahtev. Međutim, ako postoje naznake da je zatvaranje povezano sa problemima sa kockanjem, situacija može biti procenjena drugačije.
Unapred vam hvala na saradnji. Radujem se vašem odgovoru.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Petra
Dear PlayerEsp1021,
Thank you very much for your reply and for providing additional details regarding your case. I’m very sorry to hear about your experience.
First, I would like to clarify an important distinction between a standard account closure and self-exclusion. A regular account closure does not necessarily prevent the account from being reopened in the future, whereas self-exclusion is a stricter measure that should prevent any further access, especially if it was requested due to gambling-related concerns.
In your case, you mentioned that you requested a permanent account closure due to accumulated losses and that the casino confirmed the account was closed. However, you were later able to regain access and continue playing.
To better understand the situation, I would like to ask you for a few additional details:
- Can you clarify how exactly you requested the account closure (e.g. via email, live chat)?
- Did you explicitly mention gambling issues or request self-exclusion at that time?
- Approximately when in 2025 did this request take place?
- How was your account reopened — did you request reactivation, or was access restored without your action?
You mentioned that you no longer have access to your previous email account. That’s understandable. In this case, please forward us any communication you receive from the casino support, especially the logs you have requested from them.
Please note that if the account was only closed (and not self-excluded), the casino may be allowed to reopen it upon request. However, if there are indications that the closure was related to gambling problems, the situation may be assessed differently.
Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation. I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Petra
Automatski prevedeno: