Naslov žalbe
Stake.com je konfiskovao 25.476 dolara nakon nejasnih tvrdnji o „obmanjujućim" KYC informacijama
Žalba
Želeo bih da podnesem žalbu u vezi sa odlukom Stake.com-a da trajno ograniči moj nalog i konfiskuje moj celokupni iznos od 25.476 dolara.
Moj nalog je prvobitno verifikovan pomoću moje nacionalne lične karte. 11. marta sam uplatio približno 9.000 dolara na račun.
Sredstva su ostala na računu neko vreme pre nego što sam počeo da se kladim. Nakon što sam počeo da se kladim, moj saldo se povećao na 25.476 dolara.
20. marta, kada sam pokušao da postavim dalje opklade, moj nalog je bio ograničen i Stake je zahtevao dodatnu KYC verifikaciju.
Prvo sam ponovo podneo svoju nacionalnu ličnu kartu. Zatim me je tim za usklađenost kompanije Stake obavestio da ću morati da dostavim ili pasoš ili vozačku dozvolu.
U to vreme nisam imao nijedan od ova dva dokumenta. Zato sam podneo zahtev za bangladeški pasoš, čije je dobijanje trajalo otprilike dva meseca.
Kada sam dobio pasoš, poslao sam ga Stejku zajedno sa traženom selfijskom verifikacijom.
Nakon završetka ovog procesa, Stejk me je obavestio:
„Nakon detaljnog pregleda vašeg naloga i dostavljene dokumentacije „Poznaj svog klijenta" (KYC), utvrdili smo da su dostavljene informacije bile obmanjujuće."
Stejk je potom trajno ograničio moj nalog i konfiskovao celokupno stanje na računu, oslanjajući se na klauzulu 4.19 svojih Uslova korišćenja usluge.
Centralno pitanje je to što Stejk nikada nije jasno objasnio koje su informacije navodno obmanjujuće.
Prvobitno sam se verifikovao koristeći svoju nacionalnu ličnu kartu. Kada je Stejk kasnije posebno zatražio pasoš ili vozačku dozvolu, prošao sam kroz proces dobijanja važećeg pasoša i podneo ga zajedno sa traženim selfijem za verifikaciju.
Uprkos tome, Stejk nije identifikovao:
* koje su konkretne informacije navodno bile lažne ili obmanjujuće;
* koji KYC dokument ili izjava je smatran problematičnim;
* koji dokazi potkrepljuju navod;
* zašto je konfiskacija celokupnog preostalog iznosa od 25.476 dolara bila opravdana;
* ili zašto dalja provera nije smatrana dovoljnom.
Verujem da konfiskacija tako značajnog preostalog iznosa zasnovana samo na opštoj izjavi da su neodređene informacije „obmanjujuće" nije razumna, osim ako Stake ne može jasno da identifikuje problem i pruži dokaze koji potkrepljuju njenu odluku.
Takođe postoji posebno pitanje u vezi sa mojim prvobitnim depozitom od približno 9.000 dolara. Čak i ako Stejk smatra da ima osnova da poništi deo ili sve dobitke, trebalo bi da objasni konkretnu ugovornu i činjeničnu osnovu na osnovu koje smatra da ima pravo da zadrži deponovana sredstva.
Stoga molim za pomoć u zahtevanju od Stejka da pruži detaljno objašnjenje i dokaze za svoju tvrdnju.
Ako Stejk ne može da potkrepi tvrdnju da su namerno date obmanjujuće informacije, zahtevam povraćaj mog punog iznosa od 25.476 dolara.
Mogu da obezbedim relevantnu KYC prepisku, informacije o depozitu, komunikaciju sa računom i drugu prateću dokumentaciju ako je potrebno.
Complaint title
Stake.com confiscated $25,476 after vague allegation of "misleading" KYC information
Complaint
I would like to file a complaint regarding Stake.com’s decision to permanently restrict my account and confiscate my entire balance of $25,476.
My account was initially verified using my national ID. On March 11, I deposited approximately $9,000 into the account.
The funds remained in the account for some time before I began betting. After I started betting, my balance increased to $25,476.
On March 20, when I attempted to place further bets, my account was restricted and Stake requested additional KYC verification.
I first resubmitted my national ID. I was then informed by Stake’s compliance team that I would need to provide either a passport or a driver’s licence.
At that time, I did not have either document. I therefore applied for a Bangladeshi passport, which took approximately two months to obtain.
Once I received the passport, I submitted it to Stake together with the requested selfie verification.
After completing this process, Stake informed me:
"Following a thorough review of your account and the submitted Know Your Customer (KYC) documentation, we have determined that the information provided was misleading."
Stake then permanently restricted my account and confiscated my entire balance, relying on Clause 4.19 of its Terms of Service.
The central issue is that Stake has never clearly explained what information was supposedly misleading.
I had originally verified using my national ID. When Stake later specifically requested a passport or driver’s licence, I went through the process of obtaining a legitimate passport and submitted it together with the requested selfie verification.
Despite this, Stake has not identified:
* which specific information was allegedly false or misleading;
* which KYC document or statement was considered problematic;
* what evidence supports the allegation;
* why confiscation of the entire $25,476 balance was justified;
* or why further verification was not considered sufficient.
I believe that confiscating such a substantial balance based only on a general statement that unspecified information was "misleading" is not reasonable unless Stake can clearly identify the issue and provide evidence supporting its decision.
There is also a separate issue regarding my original deposit of approximately $9,000. Even if Stake believes it has grounds to void some or all of the winnings, it should explain the specific contractual and factual basis on which it believes it is entitled to retain the deposited funds themselves.
I am therefore asking for assistance in requiring Stake to provide a detailed explanation and evidence for its allegation.
If Stake cannot substantiate the claim that misleading information was intentionally provided, I request the return of my full $25,476 balance.
I can provide the relevant KYC correspondence, deposit information, account communications, and other supporting documentation if required.
Automatski prevedeno: