Poštovani SupaBet kazino,
Hvala vam što ste nam pružili tražene dokaze.
Međutim, dokazi koje ste sada pružili protivreče vašoj prethodnoj izjavi da je prvi zahtev igrača za samoisključenje poslat tek 29. aprila 2025. godine.
Na osnovu novodostavljenih materijala, igrač je kontaktirao vašu podršku putem ćaskanja uživo 26. marta 2025. godine i zatražio zatvaranje naloga zbog problema sa kockanjem. Savetovano mu je da zahtev pošalje imejlom, što je i učinio istog dana.
Dana 27. marta 2025. godine , igrač je primio potvrdni imejl od kazina u kojem se tražilo da potvrdi da želi da nastavi sa zatvaranjem. U imejlu je takođe navedeno da će preostali iznos biti poništen, što mi, inače, smatramo izuzetno nepravednom praksom kada se primenjuje u kontekstu zahteva za samoisključenje. Igrač je odmah odgovorio i potvrdio svoju odluku. Međutim, čini se da nije primenjeno nikakvo efikasno ograničenje .
Prema listi depozita koju ste dostavili, igrač je i dalje mogao da uplati 2.100 evra 8. aprila 2025. godine. Ovo je daleko van svakog razumnog vremenskog okvira za obradu zahteva za samoisključenje, posebno imajući u vidu da je zahtev već bio potvrđen od strane kazina i od strane igrača.
Stoga, smatramo da igrač ima pravo na povraćaj svih depozita izvršenih od 8. aprila 2025. godine do zatvaranja naloga, kao i svih depozita izvršenih nakon što je nalog ponovo otvoren 2026. godine. Pošto datoteka koju ste poslali ne prikazuje nikakve isplate, ukupan iznos za povraćaj izgleda da je 10.430 evra .
Radujemo se vašem odgovoru.
Dear SupaBet Casino,
Thank you for providing the requested evidence.
However, the evidence you have now provided contradicts your previous statement that the player’s first self-exclusion request was sent only on April 29, 2025.
Based on the newly provided materials, the player contacted your support via live chat on March 26, 2025 and requested account closure due to gambling problems. He was advised to send the request by email, which he did on the same day.
On March 27, 2025, the player received an acknowledgement email from the casino asking him to confirm that he wished to proceed with the closure. The email also stated that the remaining balance would be voided, which we, by the way, consider an extremely unfair practice when applied in the context of a self-exclusion request. The player responded immediately and confirmed his decision. However, no effective restriction appears to have been applied.
According to the deposit list you provided, the player was still able to deposit €2,100 on April 8, 2025. This falls well outside any reasonable timeframe for processing a self-exclusion request, especially considering that the request had already been acknowledged by the casino and confirmed by the player.
Therefore, we believe that the player is eligible for a refund of all deposits made from April 8, 2025 until the account closure, as well as all deposits made after the account was reopened again in 2026. Since the file you submitted does not show any withdrawals, the total refundable amount appears to be €10,430.
We look forward to your response.
Automatski prevedeno: