Koga se to može tiče,
Podnosim zvaničnu žalbu protiv ThePokies172.net u vezi sa onim što verujem da je prevarno zadržavanje mog isplaćenog iznosa od 1.000 novozelandskih dolara.
Zatražio sam isplatu 29. jula. Odobreno je, a ThePokies172.net je naveo da je obrađeno 30. jula. Nakon sedam radnih dana, sredstva još uvek nisu stigla na moj bankovni račun.
Kontaktirao sam podršku i rečeno mi je da nema problema i da će stvar biti prosleđena finansijskom odeljenju. Nakon što nisam dobio odgovor, ponovo sam kontaktirao podršku i dobio sam nekoliko kontradiktornih objašnjenja.
Traženo mi je da dokažem da uplata nije stigla. Prvobitno sam dostavio snimak ekrana banke, ali mi je rečeno da je potreban PDF. Preuzeo sam zvanični PDF direktno sa moje bankarske aplikacije i dostavio ga. Predstavnik po imenu Metju je više puta tvrdio da to nije PDF, a zatim je tvrdio da to nije zvanični bankarski dokument.
Pitao sam Metjua za uputstva korak po korak. Pratio sam njegova uputstva, iako su to bili isti koraci koje sam već preduzeo, ali on je nastavio da tvrdi da dokument nije PDF. Ponovio sam postupak i napravio snimke ekrana svakog koraka kako bih dokazao da sam ispravno pratio njegova uputstva.
Metju je zatim zahtevao izjavu koja počinje 28. jula. Doveo sam u pitanje njenu relevantnost jer povlačenje nije zatraženo do 29. jula. Rekao je da neće nastaviti bez nje, pre nego što je na kraju izjavio da je stvar eskalirana na nivo finansija.
Nakon još nekoliko dana bez odgovora, ponovo sam kontaktirao ćaskanje uživo. Druga predstavnica je prvobitno rekla da je dokument pogrešnog tipa datoteke. Otpremio sam potpuno isti PDF, a ona je onda rekla da je „savršen" i da je to sve što im je potrebno.
Kada sam objasnio da je to isti PDF koji je prethodno odbijen, ona je to negirala i pozvala se na moj originalni snimak ekrana. Srećom, sačuvao sam snimke ekrana mog razgovora sa Metjuom koji dokazuju da je isti PDF već dostavljen. Stvar je navodno ponovo prosleđena finansijskom odeljenju.
Dana 15. avgusta, ThePokies172.net je zahtevao dodatnu dokumentaciju za verifikaciju, iako je moj nalog već bio verifikovan i isplata je već bila odobrena.
Nakon što sam dostavio dokaz o ranijoj verifikaciji, rečeno mi je da je ime na mom nalogu moj nadimak, a ne moje zakonsko ime. Ovo je izuzetno zabrinjavajuće. Koristim Google automatsko popunjavanje za registracije, koje sadrži moje tačne zakonske podatke, i znam da se nisam registrovao koristeći svoj nadimak. Taj nadimak koristim samo povremeno u neformalnim imejlovima.
Ne razumem kako je ThePokies172.net dobio moj nadimak ili zašto se navodno pojavio na mom nalogu. Svi identifikacioni dokumenti koje sam dostavio sadrže moje tačne zakonske podatke i podudaraju se sa dokumentima koji su prvobitno korišćeni za verifikaciju mog naloga.
ThePokies172.net je verifikovao moj nalog, odobrio isplatu i izjavio da je obrađena. Pokretanje pitanja navodne neslaganosti u imenu nedeljama kasnije izgleda kao još jedan pokušaj odlaganja ili sprečavanja isplate.
Potrebno mi je:
Trenutna isplata 1.000 novozelandskih dolara;
Reference za transakciju, obrađivač i praćenje plaćanja za plaćanje navodno obrađeno 30. jula;
Kompletna istorija revizije koja pokazuje da li je ime mog naloga promenjeno, uključujući kada, kako i od strane koga;
Objašnjenje kako sam dobio svoj nadimak;
Čuvanje svih evidencija naloga, evidencija revizije, dokumenata za verifikaciju, evidencija transakcija i transkripata ćaskanja; i
Pisano objašnjenje za kontradiktorne zahteve i kašnjenja.
Sačuvao/la sam snimke ekrana, zapise ćaskanja, dokaze o verifikaciji i kopije svakog dostavljenog dokumenta.
Ukoliko se ovo pitanje ne reši brzo, podneću svoje dokaze nadležnom organu za licenciranje, pružaocima usluga plaćanja, finansijskim institucijama, regulatorima kockanja i agencijama za zaštitu potrošača na istragu.
Ime naloga: [umetni]
Korisničko ime: [umetni]
Registrovana imejl adresa: [umetni]
Iznos za povlačenje: 1.000 NZD
Zahtevano: 29. jul [godina]
Navodno obrađeno: 30. jul [godina]
Referenca za povlačenje: [umetnuti]
Očekujem suštinski pisani odgovor. Još jedna izjava da je stvar prosleđena finansijskom odeljenju neće biti prihvaćena kao rešenje.
Imam sve snimke ekrana svega kada je potrebno. Sistem će mi dozvoliti da otpremim samo neke od njih.
To Whom It May Concern,
I am making a formal complaint against ThePokies172.net regarding what I believe is the fraudulent withholding of my NZD $1,000 withdrawal.
I requested the withdrawal on 29 July. It was approved and ThePokies172.net stated that it was processed on 30 July. After seven working days, the funds had still not reached my bank account.
I contacted support and was told there was no issue and that the matter would be referred to the finance department. After receiving no response, I contacted support again and was given several contradictory explanations.
I was asked to prove the payment had not arrived. I initially provided a bank screenshot but was told a PDF was required. I downloaded an official PDF directly from my banking app and supplied it. A representative named Matthew repeatedly claimed it was not a PDF and then claimed it was not an official bank document.
I asked Matthew for step-by-step instructions. I followed his instructions, despite them being the same steps I had already taken, but he continued claiming the document was not a PDF. I repeated the process again and took screenshots of every step to prove that I had followed his instructions correctly.
Matthew then demanded a statement beginning on 28 July. I questioned its relevance because the withdrawal was not requested until 29 July. He said he would not proceed without it, before eventually stating that the matter had been escalated to finance.
After several more days without a response, I contacted live chat again. Another representative initially said the document was the wrong file type. I uploaded the exact same PDF, and she then said it was "perfect" and was all they required.
When I explained that it was the same PDF previously rejected, she denied this and referred to my original screenshot. Fortunately, I had retained screenshots of my conversation with Matthew proving that the same PDF had already been provided. The matter was again supposedly referred to finance.
On 15 August, ThePokies172.net demanded further verification documents, even though my account was already verified and the withdrawal had already been approved.
After I provided proof of the earlier verification, I was told the name on my account was my nickname rather than my legal name. This is extremely concerning. I use Google Autofill for registrations, which contains my correct legal details, and I know I did not register using my nickname. I use that nickname only occasionally in informal emails.
I do not understand how ThePokies172.net obtained my nickname or why it has allegedly appeared on my account. All identification documents I supplied contain my correct legal information and match the documents originally used to verify my account.
ThePokies172.net verified my account, approved the withdrawal and stated that it had been processed. Raising a supposed name discrepancy weeks later appears to be another attempt to delay or prevent payment.
I require:
Immediate payment of the NZD $1,000;
The transaction, processor and payment-tracing references for the payment allegedly processed on 30 July;
A complete audit history showing whether my account name was changed, including when, how and by whom;
An explanation of how my nickname was obtained;
Preservation of all account records, audit logs, verification documents, transaction records and chat transcripts; and
A written explanation for the contradictory demands and delays.
I have retained screenshots, chat records, verification evidence and copies of every document supplied.
Unless this matter is resolved promptly, I will submit my evidence to the relevant licensing authority, payment providers, financial institutions, gambling regulators and consumer-protection agencies for investigation.
Account name: [insert]
Username: [insert]
Registered email: [insert]
Withdrawal amount: NZD $1,000
Requested: 29 July [year]
Reportedly processed: 30 July [year]
Withdrawal reference: [insert]
I expect a substantive written response. Another statement that the matter has been forwarded to finance will not be accepted as a resolution.
I have all the screenshots of everything when needed. The system will only let me upload some of them.
Automatski prevedeno: