Podnosim ovu žalbu u vezi sa odlukom kazina Trueluck da mi konfiskuje celokupno stanje od 4.137,82 evra na osnovu navoda o prevarnoj ili zabranjenoj aktivnosti.
Trulak me je obavestio da su mi sredstva oduzeta zbog navodnog kršenja odeljaka 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2 i 9.3 njihovih Uslova i odredbi.
Problem je što ove odredbe pokrivaju veoma širok spektar potpuno različitih aktivnosti, uključujući prevaru, dosluh, varanje, igru uz pomoć softvera, „dampovanje" čipova, deljenje naloga, klađenje preko trećih strana, korišćenje VPN-a/proksija i drugo navodno neprimereno ponašanje.
Nekoliko puta sam pitao Trulaka da pojasni šta sam zapravo uradio.
Posebno sam objasnio da mi samo citiranje Uslova i odredbi ne govori kakvo je ponašanje navodno otkriveno. Zamolio sam ih da identifikuju konkretnu aktivnost o kojoj je reč, vrstu kršenja, relevantnu igru/sesiju i da li se optužba odnosila na dosluh, prevarnu aktivnost, korišćenje VPN-a/proksija, aktivnost treće strane, igru uz pomoć softvera ili nešto drugo.
Uprkos ovim zahtevima, Trulak je više puta odbio da pruži bilo kakvo konkretno objašnjenje.
Umesto toga, njihov tim za podršku mi je sada u suštini poslao isti odgovor tri puta, više puta citirajući odeljke 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2 i 9.3 i navodeći da je njihov odgovorni tim „otkrio kršenja".
Čak i nakon što sam ih eksplicitno zamolio da jednostavno ne citiraju iste Uslove i odredbe ponovo, oni su to i uradili.
Snažno poričem učešće u dosluhu, varanje, predaju čipova, deljenje naloga, igranje sa trećim licima, prevarne aktivnosti ili bilo kakvu drugu manipulaciju igrom.
Razumem da kazino možda neće moći direktno da otkrije svaki detalj svojih internih sistema za otkrivanje prevara igraču. Međutim, ne verujem da bi kazino trebalo da bude u mogućnosti da konfiskuje celokupno stanje igrača od 4.137,82 evra samo navodeći nekoliko opštih Uslova i odredbi, a da čak ne identifikuje šta je igrač navodno uradio.
Ako Trueluck ima istinske dokaze koji potkrepljuju tako ozbiljnu optužbu, želeo bih da dostave relevantne dokaze i detaljno objašnjenje Casino Guru-u na nezavisnu proveru. Razumem da osetljivi dokazi, gde je to prikladno, mogu biti privatno dostavljeni Casino Guru-u, umesto da budu javno otkriveni meni.
U potpunosti sam spreman da sarađujem sa Casino Guru-om i da pružim informacije o svojoj komunikaciji sa Truelack-om ili bilo koje druge informacije potrebne za istragu.
Stoga s poštovanjem molim Casino Guru da istraži ovaj slučaj i da Truelack potkrepi svoje tvrdnje.
Ako Trulak ne može da pruži dovoljno dokaza koji pokazuju da sam počinio/la ozbiljan prekršaj koji zahteva konfiskaciju, smatram da bi moj saldo od 4.137,82 evra trebalo da bude vraćen i dostupan za podizanje.
Hvala vam na pomoći.
I am submitting this complaint regarding Trueluck Casino's decision to confiscate my entire balance of €4,137.82 based on allegations of fraudulent or prohibited activity.
Trueluck informed me that my funds had been confiscated due to alleged violations of Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 of their Terms and Conditions.
The problem is that these provisions cover a very broad range of completely different activities, including fraud, collusion, cheating, software-assisted play, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party betting, VPN/proxy usage, and other allegedly improper conduct.
I asked Trueluck several times to clarify what I had actually done.
I specifically explained that simply quoting the Terms and Conditions does not tell me what conduct was supposedly detected. I asked them to identify the specific activity involved, the type of violation, the relevant gameplay/session, and whether the accusation concerned collusion, fraudulent activity, VPN/proxy usage, third-party activity, software-assisted play, or something else.
Despite these requests, Trueluck has repeatedly refused to provide any specific explanation.
Instead, their support team has now essentially sent me the same response three times, repeatedly quoting Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 and stating that their responsible team "detected violations."
Even after I explicitly asked them not to simply quote the same Terms and Conditions again, they did exactly that.
I strongly deny engaging in collusion, cheating, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party play, fraudulent activity, or any other manipulation of gameplay.
I understand that a casino may not be able to disclose every detail of its internal fraud-detection systems directly to a player. However, I do not believe that a casino should be able to confiscate a player's entire €4,137.82 balance merely by citing several broad Terms and Conditions without even identifying what the player allegedly did.
If Trueluck has genuine evidence supporting such a serious accusation, I would like them to provide the relevant evidence and a detailed explanation to Casino Guru for independent review. I understand that sensitive evidence may, where appropriate, be provided privately to Casino Guru rather than publicly disclosed to me.
I am fully willing to cooperate with Casino Guru and provide my communication with Trueluck or any other information necessary for the investigation.
I therefore respectfully ask Casino Guru to investigate this case and request that Trueluck substantiate its allegations.
If Trueluck cannot provide sufficient evidence demonstrating that I committed a serious violation warranting confiscation, I believe my €4,137.82 balance should be restored and made available for withdrawal.
Thank you for your assistance.
Automatski prevedeno: