Podnosim zvaničnu žalbu protiv Trustdice kazina u vezi sa nepravednim zatvaranjem mog naloga, odbijanjem mog zahteva za povlačenje sredstava i naknadnim blokiranjem mog pristupa na osnovu navodnog korišćenja više naloga.
Sporni iznos i status naloga:
Čeka se povlačenje: 2.300 USDT
Preostali iznos: približno 190 USDT
Ukupan sporni iznos: približno 2.490 američkih dolara
Trenutni status: Veb lokacija je dostupna, ali je moje prijavljivanje potpuno blokirano.
Hronologija događaja (sva vremena su u UTC+7):
13. maj 2026, 07:44: Podneo sam zahtev za povlačenje 2.300 USDT. Ova sredstva (ukupno približno 2.500 USDT) su zapravo uplaćena na moj račun od strane kazina kao isplata/kompenzacija za prethodnu sistemsku grešku u vezi sa neisplaćenim iznosima. Pre nego što sam započeo ovo povlačenje, eksplicitno sam kontaktirao podršku da pitam da li je dozvoljeno povlačenje ovog konkretnog iznosa. Podrška je eksplicitno potvrdila da je sasvim u redu da se nastavi. Čuvam snimak ekrana kao dokaz ovog razgovora.
(Ovaj razgovor je preveden na korejski, tako da je za priloženi snimak ekrana potreban prevod.)
13. maj 2026, 16:18: Dobio sam imejl o blokadi naloga u kojem se navodi da postoji višestruko korišćenje naloga. To je urađeno naglo, bez prethodnog zahteva za KYC verifikaciju.
13. maj 2026, 20:32: Poslao sam objašnjenje i protestni imejl kazinu razjašnjavajući situaciju, ali do danas nisam dobio nikakav odgovor.
Objašnjenje igranja i preklapanja IP adresa:
Fer-plej: Moja glavna aktivnost je bila igranje Pačinko/Pačislot igara. Nikada nisam koristio nikakve prevarne metode ili zabranjene programe. U potpunosti sam spreman da pružim sve potrebne dokaze kako bih potvrdio legitimnost svoje igre.
Razlog za preklapanje IP adresa: Kazino je označio moj nalog zbog preklapanja IP adresa sa još trojicom igrača. Ovo je opravdana slučajnost. Ova trojica igrača su moje kolege iz iste kompanije. Povremeno se družimo u istoj sobi i igramo igre pojedinačno na našim uređajima. Štaviše, dvojica od ovih kolega žive u različitim sobama u istoj stambenoj zgradi (officetel), što znatno povećava verovatnoću deljenja iste dinamičke IP mreže.
Spremnost za verifikaciju: Sve tri osobe su različite, stvarne osobe koje su u potpunosti spremne da prođu kroz potpunu KYC verifikaciju kako bi dokazale svoje odvojene identitete. Takođe je važno napomenuti da je moj račun trenutno u neto gubitku, čak i ako se ovo čekajuće povlačenje u potpunosti obradi.
S obzirom na to da sam dobio eksplicitnu dozvolu od podrške pre povlačenja i da je preklapanje IP adresa potpuno opravdano, smatram da je ova blokada krajnje nepravedna. Ljubazno molim posredovanje Casino Guru-a kako bi se olakšale neophodne provere identiteta i pomoglo u rešavanju ovog spora kako bi moj nalog mogao biti vraćen, a moja sredstva vraćena.
Hvala vam na pomoći.
I am submitting a formal complaint against Trustdice Casino regarding the unfair closure of my account, denial of my withdrawal request, and the subsequent blocking of my login access based on alleged multi-accounting.
Disputed Amount and Account Status:
Pending Withdrawal: 2,300 USDT
Remaining Balance: Approx. 190 USDT
Total Disputed Amount: Approx. 2,490 USDT
Current Status: The website is accessible, but my login is completely blocked.
Timeline of Events (All times in UTC+7):
May 13, 2026, 07:44 AM: I submitted a withdrawal request for 2,300 USDT. This funds (approx. 2,500 USDT in total) was actually credited to my account by the casino as a payout/compensation for a previous system error regarding unpaid amounts. Before initiating this withdrawal, I explicitly contacted support to ask if it was permissible to withdraw this specific amount. Support explicitly confirmed that it was perfectly fine to proceed. I hold screenshot evidence of this conversation.
(This conversation has been translated into Korean, so the attached screenshot requires translation.)
May 13, 2026, 04:18 PM: I received an account blockage email alleging multi-accounting. This was done abruptly without any prior KYC verification request.
May 13, 2026, 08:32 PM: I sent an explanation and protest email to the casino clarifying the situation, but I have received no response to date.
Gameplay & IP Overlap Explanation:
Fair Play: My main activity involved playing Pachinko/Pachislot games. I have never utilized any fraudulent methods or prohibited programs. I am fully prepared to provide any necessary proof to verify the legitimacy of my gameplay.
Reason for IP Overlap: The casino flagged my account due to an IP overlap with three other players. This is a legitimate coincidence. These three players are my actual colleagues from the same company. We occasionally hang out in the same room and play games individually on our own devices. Furthermore, two of these colleagues reside in different rooms within the same apartment building (officetel), which heavily increases the likelihood of sharing the same dynamic IP network.
Willingness for Verification: All three individuals are distinct, real people who are entirely willing to undergo full KYC verification to prove their separate identities. It is also important to note that my account is currently at a net loss overall, even if this pending withdrawal is fully processed.
Given that I obtained explicit permission from support before withdrawing and that the IP overlap is fully justifiable, I believe this block is deeply unfair. I kindly request Casino Guru’s mediation to facilitate the necessary identity verifications and help resolve this dispute so that my account can be restored and my funds released.
Thank you for your assistance.
Automatski prevedeno: