Podnosim ovu žalbu u vezi sa postupanjem kompanije Vegazone u vezi sa ponovljenim otkrivanjima odgovornog kockanja i zahtevima za trajno zatvaranje mog naloga pre nego što naknadno pretrpim značajne gubitke od kockanja.
Želim da budem jasan da ne tražim nadoknadu samo zato što sam izgubio novac na kockanju. Prihvatam da sam se naknadno kockao. Moja žalba se odnosi na ono što se dogodilo pre tih gubitaka, kada sam shvatio da gubim kontrolu i aktivno pokušao da sprečim sebe da nastavim sa kockanjem.
Pozadina
Imao sam dodeljenog VIP menadžera Vegazona, Eduarda. WhatsApp je bio uspostavljeni komunikacioni kanal preko kojeg sam ranije direktno komunicirao sa njim, uključujući i samo nekoliko nedelja ranije. Nikada nisam obavešten da je WhatsApp obustavljen ili da se više ne prati. Važno je napomenuti da je veb-sajt Vegazona nastavio javno da oglašava mogućnost kontaktiranja mog VIP menadžera putem WhatsApp-a.
Takođe sam prethodno dva puta koristio Vegazonov servis za odgovorno kockanje „Take a Break".
Zahtevi za trajno zatvaranje
Dana 17. i 18. juna, tokom perioda u kojem sam shvatio da moje kockanje postaje nekontrolisano, kontaktirao sam svog VIP menadžera putem WhatsApp-a.
Moje poruke su bile eksplicitne. Objasnio sam da verujem da imam problem sa kockanjem, da sam izgubio više nego što mogu da priuštim, da pokušavam da nadoknadim gubitke i da se plašim da ću ponovo doći do propasti ako račun ostane dostupan.
Najvažnije je to što sam više puta tražio da mi se nalog trajno zatvori.
To nisu bile retrospektivne izjave date nakon gubitaka koji čine ovu žalbu. To su bili istovremeni zahtevi za intervenciju podneti prethodno, tokom perioda jasnoće u kojem sam pokušavao da se zaštitim od svog kasnijeg kockarskog ponašanja.
Nije preduzeta nikakva akcija po tim zahtevima i moj nalog je ostao dostupan.
Zašto sam razumno koristio WhatsApp
Vegazon se sada oslanja na klauzulu 7.1 svojih Uslova i odredbi, koja navodi da zahteve za zatvaranje naloga treba podneti na njihovu adresu e-pošte za podršku.
Međutim, WhatsApp je bio uspostavljeni kanal za direktnu komunikaciju sa mojim VIP menadžerom. Uspešno sam ga koristio neposredno pre toga, nikada nisam obavešten da je ukinut, a Vegazone je nastavio javno da reklamira WhatsApp za kontaktiranje mog VIP menadžera.
Takođe postoje dokazi iz ćaskanja uživo iz tog vremena koji pokazuju da sam posebno istakao da nisam dobijao odgovore putem WhatsApp-a. Uprkos tome, predstavnici Vegazone-a nisu mi rekli da se WhatsApp više ne prati ili da se komunikacije poslate tamo neće obrađivati.
Stoga nisam imao izričito obaveštenje da je uspostavljeni komunikacioni kanal, koji je sam Vegazon nastavio da reklamira, prestao sa radom.
Naknadni gubici
Otprilike mesec dana kasnije, dogodio se ishod koji sam želeo da sprečim.
Tokom otprilike osam sati, uplatio sam oko 100.000 australijskih dolara kroz približno 80–100 transakcija, dok sam se više puta kockao i jurio gubitke. Moj račun je ostao funkcionalan sve vreme, bez ikakve intervencije u vezi sa odgovornim kockanjem ili kontakta sa socijalnom pomoći.
Ne krijem vreme između mojih zahteva za zatvaranje i ovih gubitaka. To je ključno za moju žalbu. Unapred sam zatražio trajno zatvaranje upravo zato što sam shvatio da bih se kasnije mogao vratiti kockanju i ponovo izgubiti kontrolu.
Da je trajno zatvaranje koje sam više puta tražio sprovedeno, naknadno kockanje preko ovog računa ne bi moglo da se dogodi.
Vegazonov odgovor
Podneo sam formalnu žalbu i dostavio dokaze. Vegazonov tim za usklađenost ju je odbio, uglavnom se oslanjajući na klauzulu 7.1 i navodeći da prethodno korišćenje usluge „Take a Break" nije stvorilo obavezu praćenja na neodređeno vreme.
Međutim, njihov konačni odgovor ne obraća adekvatno pažnju na centralne dokaze.
Ne objašnjava zašto je WhatsApp i dalje javno reklamiran za kontaktiranje mog VIP menadžera; zašto nikada nisam obavešten da se više ne prati; šta se desilo sa obaveštenjima o odgovornom kockanju i ponovljenim zahtevima za trajno zatvaranje poslatim tamo; zašto me osoblje za ćaskanje uživo nije ispravilo kada sam izričito pomenuo poteškoće u dobijanju odgovora putem WhatsApp-a; ili kako su ove okolnosti razmatrane zajedno sa mojom kasnijom eskalacijom kockanja.
Stoga molim Casino Guru da nezavisno pregleda da li je Vegazone na odgovarajući način postupio sa mojim izjavama o odgovornom kockanju i ponovljenim zahtevima za trajno zatvaranje naloga.
Tražim 75.000 australijskih dolara kao rešenje, a ne celokupni iznos od približno 100.000 australijskih dolara koji je naknadno deponovan/izgubljen.
Sačuvao/la sam komunikaciju preko WhatsApp-a, zapise ćaskanja uživo, dokaze sa veb-sajta, istoriju naloga i prepisku o usklađenosti i mogu da pružim kompletne zapise ako je potrebno.
I am submitting this complaint concerning Vegazone's handling of repeated responsible gambling disclosures and requests to permanently close my account before I subsequently suffered significant gambling losses.
I want to make clear that I am not seeking reimbursement simply because I lost money gambling. I accept that I subsequently gambled. My complaint concerns what happened before those losses, when I recognised that I was losing control and actively attempted to prevent myself from being able to continue gambling.
Background
I had an assigned Vegazone VIP Manager, Eduard. WhatsApp was an established communication channel through which I had previously communicated directly with him, including only weeks beforehand. I was never informed that WhatsApp had been discontinued or was no longer monitored. Importantly, Vegazone's website continued publicly advertising the ability to contact my VIP Manager via WhatsApp.
I had also previously used Vegazone's "Take a Break" responsible gambling facility on two occasions.
Requests for permanent closure
On 17–18 June, during a period in which I recognised that my gambling was becoming uncontrollable, I contacted my VIP Manager through WhatsApp.
My messages were explicit. I explained that I believed I had a gambling problem, had lost more than I could afford, was attempting to recover losses and feared I would spiral again if the account remained available.
Most importantly, I repeatedly requested that my account be permanently closed.
These were not retrospective statements made after the losses forming this complaint. They were contemporaneous requests for intervention made beforehand, during a period of clarity in which I was trying to protect myself from my subsequent gambling behaviour.
No action was taken on those requests and my account remained available.
Why I reasonably used WhatsApp
Vegazone now relies upon Clause 7.1 of its Terms and Conditions, which states that account closure requests should be submitted to its support email address.
However, WhatsApp was an established channel for communicating directly with my VIP Manager. I had successfully used it shortly beforehand, was never informed it had been discontinued, and Vegazone continued publicly advertising WhatsApp for contacting my VIP Manager.
There is also contemporaneous live-chat evidence showing that I specifically raised that I was not receiving responses through WhatsApp. Despite this, Vegazone's representatives did not tell me that WhatsApp was no longer monitored or that communications sent there would not be actioned.
I therefore had no express notification that an established communication channel, which Vegazone itself continued to advertise, had ceased operating.
Subsequent losses
Approximately one month later, the outcome I had sought to prevent occurred.
During approximately eight hours, I deposited around AUD $100,000 through approximately 80–100 transactions while repeatedly gambling and chasing losses. My account remained operational throughout, with no responsible gambling intervention or welfare contact.
I do not conceal the time between my closure requests and these losses. It is central to my complaint. I requested permanent closure in advance precisely because I recognised that I could subsequently return to gambling and lose control again.
Had the permanent closure I repeatedly requested been implemented, the subsequent gambling through this account could not have occurred.
Vegazone's response
I raised a formal complaint and provided supporting evidence. Vegazone's Compliance Team rejected it, principally relying upon Clause 7.1 and stating that previous use of Take a Break did not create an indefinite monitoring obligation.
However, their Final Response does not adequately address the central evidence.
It does not explain why WhatsApp continued to be publicly advertised for contacting my VIP Manager; why I was never informed that it was no longer monitored; what happened to the responsible gambling disclosures and repeated permanent-closure requests sent there; why live-chat staff did not correct me when I expressly raised difficulties obtaining responses through WhatsApp; or how these circumstances were considered alongside my subsequent gambling escalation.
I therefore ask Casino Guru to independently review whether Vegazone appropriately handled my responsible gambling disclosures and repeated requests for permanent account closure.
I am seeking AUD $75,000 as resolution rather than the entirety of the approximately AUD $100,000 subsequently deposited/lost.
I have retained the WhatsApp communications, live-chat records, website evidence, account history and Compliance correspondence and can provide the complete records if required.
Automatski prevedeno: