Dragi Wild.io kazino,
Hvala vam što ste pružili objašnjenje u vezi sa vašim stavom po ovom pitanju. Razumem ključnu važnost zaštite promocija od zloupotrebe i potrebu da kazina preduzmu mere protiv igrača koji pokušaju da iskoriste promotivne ponude.
Nakon pregleda dostupnih informacija u vezi sa ovom žalbom, imam izvesne rezerve u vezi sa tim da li predstavljeni dokazi dovoljno opravdavaju konfiskaciju igračevog dobitka.
Glavna briga je što dokazi ukazuju na to da ovi nalozi pripadaju dvema različitim osobama. Oba naloga su uspešno prošla video verifikaciju i nisam naišao ni na jedan dokaz koji ukazuje na to da je jedna osoba upravljala oba naloga ili da su igrači sarađivali kako bi stekli nepravednu prednost.
Primećene sličnosti, kao što je to što oba igrača zahtevaju isti bonus dobrodošlice i nakon toga učestvuju u sličnoj igri, po mom mišljenju same po sebi ne predstavljaju dovoljan dokaz zloupotrebe bonusa. Sasvim je moguće da igrači koji dobiju istu promociju pokažu slične obrasce igre, posebno kada koriste bonus sredstva.
Razumem obrazloženje koje stoji iza vaših Uslova i odredbi, koji imaju za cilj da spreče scenarije koji uključuju kreiranje više naloga od strane pojedinca ili pokušaje igrača da zaobiđu promotivna ograničenja. Ipak, verujem da bi trebalo da postoji jasna veza uspostavljena između naloga, zajedno sa konkretnim dokazima o namernom nedoličnom ponašanju u ovoj situaciji.
U ovom trenutku, nisam video dokaze koji podržavaju sledeće:
- korišćenje istog uređaja ili tehničkog okruženja od strane oba naloga;
- isti novčanik za plaćanje;
- zajedničko domaćinstvo ili adresa;
- bilo koji dodatni objektivni dokaz koji potkrepljuje vezu između ovih izveštaja ili pokazuje da su igrači delovali u lošoj veri.
S obzirom na to da su oba igrača uspešno završila video verifikaciju i da nema jasnih dokaza koji ukazuju da su ista osoba ili da su se na bilo koji način dogovarali, smatram da bi bilo razumnije i pravednije rešenje da se isplate oduzeti dobici.
U potpunosti razumem potrebu zaštite vaših promocija, ali takođe smatram da pravi igrači ne bi trebalo da izgube svoje dobitke samo na osnovu karakteristika koje mogu biti prisutne kod nepovezanih igrača.
Ljubazno Vas molim da ponovo razmotrite ovaj slučaj i istražite mogućnost postizanja pravednog rešenja.
Hvala vam na pažnji posvećenoj ovom pitanju i vašoj saradnji.
Dear Wild.io Casino,
Thank you for providing an explanation regarding your position on this matter. I understand the critical importance of safeguarding promotions from misuse and the necessity for casinos to take measures against players who may attempt to exploit promotional offers.
Upon reviewing the information available concerning this complaint, I have some reservations about whether the evidence presented sufficiently justifies the confiscation of the player’s winnings.
The primary concern is that the evidence suggests these accounts belong to two distinct individuals. Both accounts successfully completed video verification, and I have not encountered any evidence indicating that a single individual was managing both accounts or that the players were collaborating to gain an unfair advantage.
The similarities noted, such as both players claiming the same Welcome Bonus and engaging in similar gameplay thereafter, do not, in my view, constitute sufficient proof of bonus abuse on their own. It is entirely possible for players receiving the same promotion to exhibit similar gameplay patterns, particularly when utilizing bonus funds.
I recognize the rationale behind your Terms and Conditions, which aim to prevent scenarios involving the creation of multiple accounts by an individual or attempts by players to circumvent promotional restrictions. Nevertheless, I believe there should be a clear relationship established between the accounts, along with concrete evidence of intentional misconduct in this situation.
At this point, I have not seen evidence supporting the following:
- the usage of the same device or technical environment by both accounts;
- the same payment wallet;
- a shared household or address;
- any additional objective evidence substantiating a link between these accounts or demonstrating that the players acted in bad faith.
Given that both players successfully completed video verification and there is no clear evidence indicating they are the same person or that they colluded in any way, I believe it would be a more reasonable and equitable resolution to release the confiscated winnings.
I fully understand the necessity of protecting your promotions, yet I also feel that genuine players should not forfeit their winnings solely based on characteristics that may be present among unrelated players.
I kindly request that you reconsider this case and explore the possibility of reaching a fair resolution.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and your cooperation.
Automatski prevedeno: