Zdravo Jerrycan808,
Hvala vam na detaljnim odgovorima i što ste do sada pružili sve informacije.
Želeo bih da uputim još jedan poslednji zahtev za dokaze u vezi sa vašim slučajem.
Veoma je važno razjasniti da zahtev za samoisključenje, sam po sebi, ne znači automatski da je igrač eksplicitno obavestio kazino o problemu sa kockanjem. Neki kazina nude alate za samoisključenje koji se mogu koristiti iz različitih razloga, bez klasifikacije korisnika kao problematičnog kockara.
Da bismo procenili nivo odgovornosti kazina u pogledu odgovornog kockanja, potreban nam je jasan dokaz da ste eksplicitno obavestili kazino o svom problemu sa kockanjem. To može biti u obliku:
- imejl,
- transkript ćaskanja uživo,
- ili bilo koju drugu komunikaciju u kojoj je to jasno navedeno.
Pored toga, ako alat za samoisključivanje nije funkcionisao kako se očekivalo, važno je napomenuti da kazino nudi alternativne metode za zahtevanje samoisključivanja, kao što su:
- kontaktiranje podrške putem e-pošte ( support@winna.com ), ili
- kontaktiranje putem ćaskanja uživo.
U ovoj fazi, potrebno je da vidimo dokaze da ste koristili ove kanale i eksplicitno saopštili kazinou svoj problem sa kockanjem.
Stoga bih Vas još jednom ljubazno zamolio da proverite da li ste u mogućnosti da pružite takve dokaze. Bez toga, biće nam veoma teško da nastavimo sa slučajem.
Unapred vam hvala na razumevanju i saradnji.
Hi Jerrycan808,
Thank you for your detailed replies and for providing all the information so far.
I would like to make one final request for supporting evidence regarding your case.
It is very important to clarify that a self-exclusion request, on its own, does not automatically mean that the player has explicitly informed the casino about a gambling problem. Some casinos offer self-exclusion tools that can be used for various reasons, without classifying the user as a problem gambler.
For us to assess the casino’s level of responsibility in terms of responsible gambling, we need clear proof that you explicitly informed the casino about your gambling problem (GP). This could be in the form of:
- an email,
- a live chat transcript,
- or any other communication where this was clearly stated.
Additionally, if the self-exclusion tool did not work as expected, it is important to note that the casino provides alternative methods to request self-exclusion, such as:
At this stage, we need to see evidence that you used these channels and explicitly communicated your gambling problem to the casino.
Therefore, I would kindly ask you one last time to check whether you are able to provide any such supporting evidence. Without this, it will be very difficult for us to proceed further with the case.
Thank you in advance for your understanding and cooperation.
Automatski prevedeno: