1. Rezime spora
Podnosim ovaj formalni prigovor u vezi sa odlukom operatera da zatvori moj račun i zadrži moj dug na osnovu navodnog kršenja pravila „jedan račun po osobi".
Operator nije pružio nikakve proverljive ili objektivne dokaze da sam registrovao, kontrolisao ili imao koristi od bilo kog dodatnog naloga. Čini se da je odluka zasnovana isključivo na pretpostavci ili povezanosti sa drugom osobom (mojim supružnikom), što je činjenično netačno.
2. Činjenično pojašnjenje
Potvrđujem sledeće:
Registrovao/la sam se i koristio/la samo jedan nalog kod XON.BET-a
Ne posedujem, ne kontrolišem niti upravljam bilo kojim drugim nalogom kod operatera
Moj supružnik je posebna osoba sa posebnim identitetom, potvrđenim zvaničnim dokumentima koje je izdala vlada
Imamo različite lične podatke, identifikaciona dokumenta i finansijske instrumente
Pretpostavka operatera da smo ista osoba ili povezani nalozi je netačna i nepotkrepljena.
3. Proceduralni problem (nedostatak mogućnosti verifikacije)
Nije zatražena niti završena odgovarajuća KYC verifikacija pre konačne mere sprovođenja.
Kao rezultat toga, nisam dobio značajnu priliku da dokažem ili potvrdim svoj identitet pre nego što je ograničenje uvedeno.
Izričito sam ponudio punu saradnju i dalje sam u potpunosti spreman da završim svaki potrebni proces verifikacije.
Odsustvo prethodnog ili istovremenog procesa verifikacije rezultiralo je preuranjenim i nepotkrepljenim zaključkom operatera.
4. Teret dokazivanja i nedostatak dokaza
Operator nije dostavio nikakve dokaze koji pokazuju:
Vlasništvo ili kontrola nad više naloga
Deljeni načini plaćanja između naloga
Identični podaci o identitetu
Bilo koji oblik zloupotrebe bonusa ili prevarnog ponašanja
Puka sumnja ili unutrašnja korelacija nisu dovoljno opravdanje za oduzimanje sredstava ili zatvaranje računa.
U sporovima ove prirode, teret dokazivanja mora biti na operateru, koji iznosi tvrdnju.
5. Nesrazmernost delovanja
Čak i da je postojala zabrinutost u vezi sa usklađenošću, trajno ograničenje računa i zadržavanje legitimnih sredstava je nesrazmerna mera, posebno imajući u vidu:
Odsustvo dokazane namere ili prevare
Mali iznos spora (oko 100 evra)
Moja puna spremnost da potvrdim identitet i sarađujem
6. Traženi ishod
S poštovanjem molim CADRE:
Sprovesti potpunu nezavisnu reviziju odluke operatera
Zahtevati od operatera da pruži konkretne dokaze koji potkrepljuju tvrdnju
Potvrđujem da nemam dodatnih naloga i da nije došlo do kršenja klauzule 9.1.2
Naložite oslobađanje mojih legitimnih sredstava ako ne postoji dokazano kršenje
7. Završna reč
Podnosim ovaj spor u dobroj veri i sa punom spremnošću za saradnju. Verujem da je trenutna odluka zasnovana na pogrešnim pretpostavkama, a ne na proverenim činjenicama, i zahtevam pravednu i na dokazima zasnovanu ponovnu procenu slučaja.
1. Summary of the dispute
I am submitting this formal dispute regarding the operator’s decision to close my account and withhold my balance based on an alleged violation of the "one account per person" rule.
The operator has not provided any verifiable or objective evidence that I have registered, controlled, or benefited from any additional account(s). The decision appears to be based solely on assumption or association with another individual (my spouse), which is factually incorrect.
2. Factual clarification
I confirm the following:
I have only ever registered and used one account with XON.BET
I do not own, control, or operate any other account with the operator
My spouse is a separate individual with a separate identity, verified by official government-issued documents
We have distinct personal data, identification documents, and financial instruments
The operator’s assumption that we are the same person or connected accounts is incorrect and unsupported.
3. Procedural concern (lack of verification opportunity)
No proper KYC verification was requested or completed prior to the final enforcement action.
As a result, I was not given a meaningful opportunity to demonstrate or confirm my identity before the restriction was imposed.
I explicitly offered full cooperation and am still fully willing to complete any required verification process.
The absence of a prior or concurrent verification process has resulted in a premature and unsupported conclusion by the operator.
4. Burden of proof and lack of evidence
The operator has not provided any evidence demonstrating:
Multi-account ownership or control
Shared payment methods between accounts
Identical identity data
Any form of bonus abuse or fraudulent behaviour
A mere suspicion or internal correlation is not sufficient justification for confiscation of funds or account termination.
In disputes of this nature, the burden of proof must lie with the operator, who is making the allegation.
5. Disproportionality of action
Even if a compliance concern had existed, the permanent restriction of the account and withholding of legitimate funds is a disproportionate measure, particularly given:
The absence of proven intent or fraud
The small amount in dispute (approx. EUR 100)
My full willingness to verify identity and cooperate
6. Requested outcome
I respectfully request that CADRE:
Conduct a full independent review of the operator’s decision
Require the operator to provide concrete evidence supporting the allegation
Confirm that I have no additional accounts and no breach of Clause 9.1.2 has occurred
Order the release of my legitimate funds if no proven violation exists
7. Closing statement
I submit this dispute in good faith and with full willingness to cooperate. I believe the current decision is based on incorrect assumptions rather than verified facts, and I request a fair and evidence-based reassessment of the case.
Automatski prevedeno: