Draga Munja,
Hvala vam na kontinuiranom angažovanju i što delite svoja zapažanja.
Ljubazno bismo vas zamolili da pažljivo pregledate naše prethodne odgovore, jer verujemo da smo već odgovorili na svaku od tačaka koje ste pokrenuli, uključujući i one koje se odnose na naše procedure odgovornog igranja, otkrivanje duplih naloga, promotivne komunikacije na koje se igrač poziva i primenu naših Uslova i odredbi.
Kao što je prethodno objašnjeno, implementirali smo mere zaštite igrača i kontrole usklađenosti koje zahteva naš okvir za licenciranje i regulativu. Iako nijedan sistem praćenja ne može garantovati trenutno otkrivanje u svakoj okolnosti, naše kontrole funkcionišu kroz kombinaciju automatizovanog praćenja, procedura verifikacije, kontinuiranih pregleda usklađenosti i procena rizika. Nakon što je utvrđeno da nalog krši naše Uslove i odredbe, preduzete su odgovarajuće mere u skladu sa našim internim politikama i regulatornim obavezama.
Takođe s poštovanjem primećujemo da je trenutna diskusija prevazišla prvobitnu temu žalbe. Žalba se odnosi na zatvaranje dupliranog naloga i oduzimanje sredstava u skladu sa našim Uslovima i odredbama. Naš stav o ovom pitanju je u potpunosti objašnjen i potkrepljen relevantnim ugovornim odredbama koje se primenjuju na nalog igrača.
Što se tiče promotivnih imejlova, već smo potvrdili da pregledani materijali ne pokazuju da je Jugado pozvao, ohrabrio ili naložio igraču da kreira novi nalog nakon zatvaranja originalnog naloga. Njihovo postojanje ne menja ugovorne obaveze koje se primenjuju na igrača niti poništava sprovođenje naše politike duplih naloga nakon što je kršenje utvrđeno.
Iako cenimo vaš kontinuirani fokus na odgovorno igranje, s poštovanjem se ne slažemo sa sugestijom da ovaj slučaj pokazuje nedostatke u našem okviru za zaštitu igrača. Mere odgovornog igranja primenjene na originalni nalog i naknadna primena naše politike dupliranja naloga su odvojena pitanja, a oba su obrađena u skladu sa našim regulatornim obavezama, internim procedurama i Uslovima i odredbama.
Takođe moramo s poštovanjem da izjavimo da nije prikladno donositi zaključke o adekvatnosti našeg okvira za odgovorno igranje na osnovu jedne žalbe. Politike i procedure odgovornog igranja kompanije Yuugado sprovode se u skladu sa zahtevima našeg organa za licenciranje i podležu regulatornom nadzoru. Svaka procena naše regulatorne usklađenosti spada u nadležnost nadležnog organa za licenciranje, a ne u javni postupak rešavanja sporova.
Stoga, naš stav ostaje nepromenjen. Verujemo da smo u potpunosti odgovorili na pitanja pokrenuta u ovoj žalbi i nemamo dodatnih informacija koje bismo dodali pored onih koje su već dostavljene.
Još jednom vam hvala na saradnji tokom ovog procesa.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Mario
Specijalista za rešavanje problema
Dear Munya,
Thank you for your continued engagement and for sharing your observations.
We would kindly ask you to carefully review our previous responses, as we believe we have already addressed each of the points you have raised, including those relating to our Responsible Gaming procedures, duplicate account detection, the promotional communications referenced by the player, and the application of our Terms and Conditions.
As previously explained, we have implemented the player protection measures and compliance controls required under our licensing and regulatory framework. While no monitoring system can guarantee immediate detection in every circumstance, our controls operate through a combination of automated monitoring, verification procedures, ongoing compliance reviews, and risk assessments. Once the account was identified as being in breach of our Terms and Conditions, the appropriate action was taken in accordance with our internal policies and regulatory obligations.
We also respectfully note that the current discussion has moved beyond the original subject of the complaint. The complaint concerns the closure of a duplicate account and the forfeiture of funds under our Terms and Conditions. Our position on this matter has been fully explained and supported by the relevant contractual provisions applicable to the player's account.
Regarding the promotional emails, we have already confirmed that the materials reviewed do not demonstrate that Yuugado invited, encouraged, or instructed the player to create a new account following the closure of the original account. Their existence does not alter the contractual obligations applicable to the player nor invalidate the enforcement of our duplicate account policy once the breach was identified.
While we appreciate your continued focus on Responsible Gaming, we respectfully disagree with the suggestion that this case demonstrates shortcomings in our player protection framework. The Responsible Gaming measures applied to the original account and the subsequent enforcement of our duplicate account policy are separate matters, both of which were handled in accordance with our regulatory obligations, internal procedures, and Terms and Conditions.
We must also respectfully state that it is not appropriate to draw conclusions regarding the adequacy of our Responsible Gaming framework based on a single complaint. Yuugado's Responsible Gaming policies and procedures are implemented in accordance with the requirements of our licensing authority and are subject to regulatory oversight. Any assessment of our regulatory compliance falls within the remit of the competent licensing authority, not a public dispute resolution process.
As such, our position remains unchanged. We believe we have fully addressed the issues raised in this complaint and have no further information to add beyond what has already been provided.
Thank you again for your cooperation throughout this process.
Kind regards,
Mario
Resolution Specialist
Automatski prevedeno: