Zdravo, Treeku.
Vidite, možda problem leži u očekivanjima. Mi nismo advokati, što znači da ja ili moje kolege ne pristupamo isplati sa nekog pravnog stanovišta. Umesto toga, pridržavamo se Kodeksa za fer kockanje. Kako ja vidim situaciju, vi ste dobrovoljno uplatili novac u kazino sa niskim indeksom bezbednosti, a sada kažete da isplate ne idu kako se očekuje. Pa, ima smisla, jer kazino nije baš pouzdan, barem sada, na osnovu njegove recenzije:

Verujem da ovde govorimo o istoj stvari.
Vaša žalba, ako se fokusiramo na činjenice, došla je do tačke u kojoj vam je savetovano da koristite jednu od alternativnih opcija plaćanja koje su vam dostupne. Razumem da imate željenu opciju plaćanja za isplatu, ali izgleda da više nije dostupna. Međutim, to ne znači nužno da kazino nije voljan da vam plati. Izgleda da više volite da ne koristite drugu opciju.
Hello treeku.
You see, perhaps the problem lies in the expectations. We are not lawyers, which means that I or my colleagues do not approach the withdrawal from some legal standpoint. We adhere to the Fair Gambling Codex instead. The way I see the situation, you willingly deposited in a casino with a low safety index, and now you are saying that the withdrawals are not proceeding as expected. Well, it makes sense, because the casino is not very trustworthy, at least now, based on its review:

I believe we're saying the same thing here.
Your complaint, if we focus on facts, progressed to the point where you were advised to use one of the alternative payment options available to you. I understand you have a preferred payment option for the withdrawal, but it does not appear to be available anymore. However, this does not necessarily imply that the casino is unwilling to pay you. It appears that you prefer not to use a different option.
Automatski prevedeno: