NaslovnaForumKazinaLuckyDreams Casino - opšta diskusija

LuckyDreams Casino - opšta diskusija (strana 8)

32.763 pregleda 139 odgovora |
pre 3 godina
|
1...7 8
Dodajte post
Radka
pre 22 sati
dersus

Hvala vam na porukama; dobro je znati da neko iz Casino Guru-a bar pokušava da mi pomogne. Zato šaljem sledeću poruku. Molim vas da je prosledite Stefanu, hvala.


Zdravo Radka,


Sve relevantne informacije i objašnjenja sam već u potpunosti i sveobuhvatno dokumentovao u forumskom ćaskanju. Čitava materija je tamo predstavljena na strukturiran način.


Uprkos tome, niko nas nije kontaktirao već najmanje dve nedelje. Ni Stefan, koji je ranije bio umešan u slučaj, niti bilo koji drugi zaposleni u Casino Guru-u nisu odgovorili na nedavne objave. Slučaj je praktično u zastoju.


Pored toga, ostaje značajan problem:

Više puta sam tražio informacije u skladu sa članom 15 GDPR-a (pristup podacima). Konkretno, ovo se odnosi na one dokumente i podatke na kojima je očigledno zasnovana procena ili odluka u mom slučaju.


Međutim, ovi dokumenti mi još uvek nisu dostupni na pregled.


Stoga mi se nameće jedno vrlo jednostavno i legitimno pitanje:

  • Ako ovi dokumenti zaista postoje i korišćeni su za procenu slučaja, zašto mi jednostavno nisu pokazani?


Objavljivanje ovih dokumenata bi odmah razjasnilo činjenice i omogućilo mi da sam proverim navodni osnov odluke. Ovo bi omogućilo da se slučaj brzo i transparentno završi za sve uključene strane.


Sve dok mi se uskraćuju ove GDPR informacije o relevantnim podacima i dokumentima, proces donošenja odluka ostaje ni razumljiv ni transparentan sa moje tačke gledišta.


Zato još jednom molim:


  • Dostavljanje dokumenata i podataka u skladu sa članom 15 GDPR-a, na osnovu kojih je slučaj procenjen.
  • Izjava u kojoj se objašnjava zašto ova informacija do sada nije dostavljena.

Molim za blagovremen odgovor, jer slučaj ostaje nerešen nedeljama.


Hvala vam.

Automatski prevedeno:
pre 21 sati
dersus
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 16 sati
usrs

Public Warning – LuckyDreams Casino / Transparency and GDPR Data Access Issue


This post is intended as public information and a warning for other players, so they are aware of potential risks before deciding to play at this casino.


In my case, the issue concerns a confiscated winning amount of approximately €21,000 at LuckyDreams. The full situation has already been documented in detail and is publicly visible in the forum.


A major concern is that relevant documents and data related to the case, which appear to have been used to evaluate or justify the decision, have not been disclosed to me. Despite multiple requests, I have not received full access to my data under Article 15 of the GDPR (Right of Access). Without access to these materials, it is currently impossible for me to independently verify the basis on which the decision was made.


The case has also been reported to the relevant authority. However, there has been no response or decision from the authority for several months, leaving the matter unresolved.


The purpose of this post is not to repeat accusations but to increase transparency for other players. In situations like this, it is essential that players are able to access their own game records and case-related documentation, especially when significant sums of money are involved.


Since the entire case is publicly accessible in the forum, I recommend that anyone considering playing there review the information carefully and form their own opinion.


This notice is meant to help other players avoid encountering similar issues and make informed decisions before depositing or playing at this casino.

DiLauro1
pre 14 sati
usrs

Well, since the complaint ended differently, I guess there isn't much to add without eliciting negative emotions. So, let me share the complaint outcome; I honestly don't have anything else to add. I've already stated that the mediators are the only ones who have complete context from both you and the casino. I'll leave it like that.

"Thank you for your detailed follow-up and for providing the additional information.

After carefully reviewing the evidence submitted by the casino, including the bet history and internal records shared with us, we can confirm that the maximum bet rule was violated multiple times during the active bonus wagering period. The data provided clearly indicates that wagers significantly exceeding the permitted €5 limit were placed while the bonus was still active.

As stated in the Bonus Terms and Conditions, which were accepted prior to activating the promotion, placing bets above the maximum allowed amount during bonus wagering constitutes a breach of the bonus rules. In such cases, the casino is entitled to void any winnings derived from the bonus. Based on the documentation received, the confiscation of winnings was applied in accordance with these established rules.

While we understand your concerns regarding specific timestamps and technical details, the overall records confirm repeated violations of the maximum bet restriction during the wagering phase. Additionally, your original deposit was refunded, which aligns with the standard procedure in such situations.

Given the above, we consider the casino’s actions to be consistent with its published Terms and Conditions, and we do not find grounds to challenge the decision. Therefore, the complaint will be rejected."

I'm sorry.

1...7 8
Idi na stranicuod 8 stranica

Dodajte post

flash-message-reviews
Recenzije korisnika - Napištie svoje recenzije kazina i podelite svoje iskustvo
PP Forum Xmas Competition flash 2025
Pridružite se Božićnom takmičenju sa provajderom Pragmatic Play—dajemo nagrade u vrednosti od $2,000!

Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama - Dnevni postovi, bez depozitni bonusi, novi slotovi i još toga

Pretplatite se na naš bilten za najnovije bez depozitne bonuse, besplatne turnire, nove slotovi i drugo.