Video sam iz prve ruke kako ovaj sajt funkcioniše. Pre nekoliko meseci, podneo sam zvaničnu žalbu jer sam bio nepravedno tretiran. Posle nekog vremena, moja žalba je uklonjena bez ikakvog objašnjenja. Moj gubitak je ostao nerešen, a problem je jednostavno zakopan i zaboravljen.
Pre nekoliko dana, tema se ponovo pojavila. Ubrzo nakon toga, dogodilo se nešto veoma značajno. Najverovatnije da bi gurnuli moj negativni komentar u stranu i sakrili ga iz vida, sajt je kontaktirao ljude koji su učestvovali u snimanjima — ili čak one koji su imali problema tokom snimanja — i ponudio im nagrade u zamenu za objavljivanje pozitivnih komentara u određenoj temi. Iznenadni talas „dobrih" recenzija ovde nije slučajnost. Ovo je uobičajena taktika. Lično sam već dobio sličnu ponudu sa druge platforme, tako da tačno znam kako ovo funkcioniše.
Gospodine Jaro, verujem da bi sada trebalo da bude jasno da je moj stav opravdan. Sajt je ne samo izazvao moj finansijski gubitak i zadržao moj novac, već je pokušao i da ga prikrije.
Moje očekivanje je bilo jednostavno: trebalo je da isprave svoju grešku u to vreme i da reše problem kako treba. Čak i da je bilo zakašnjenja, mogli su da me kontaktiraju, obaveste me da je problem rešen i zamole me da to javno izjavim. Tako izgleda profesionalizam. Umesto toga, ništa od toga se nije dogodilo.
Ovo je realnost onoga što sam doživeo. Svako može da izvuče svoje zaključke.
I have seen firsthand how this site operates. Months ago, I filed an official complaint because I was treated unfairly. After some time, my complaint was removed without any explanation. My loss remained unresolved, and the issue was simply buried and forgotten.
A few days ago, the topic resurfaced. Soon after, something very telling happened. Most likely to push my negative comment down and out of sight, the site contacted people who had done shoots — or even those who had experienced issues during shoots — and offered them rewards in exchange for posting positive comments under a specific thread. The sudden wave of "good" reviews here is not a coincidence. This is a common tactic. I have personally received a similar offer from another platform before, so I know exactly how this works.
Mr. Jaro, I believe it should now be clear that my position is justified. The site not only caused my financial loss and kept my money, but also attempted to cover it up.
My expectation was simple: they should have corrected their mistake at the time and resolved the issue properly. Even if delayed, they could have contacted me, informed me that the problem was fixed, and asked me to state this publicly. That is what professionalism looks like. Instead, none of that happened.
This is the reality of what I experienced. Everyone can draw their own conclusions.
Automatski prevedeno:
