Ako mislite da bi vas neki autoritet podržao, uradio bi to na osnovu dokaza koje, nažalost, ne posedujete, ili su nedovoljni. Ako jednostavno optužite kazino za slične stvari, a nemate relevantne dokaze koji bi podržali svoje mišljenje, teško će vam pomoći, iako smo pokušali. Na taj način, igrač bi tada mogao da dođe i kaže da je kazino uradio nešto pogrešno i da mi ili autoritet treba da budemo na strani igrača, prema vašem mišljenju. Ovo ne znači da smo na jednoj ili drugoj strani. Ali bez dokaza o pobedi od 100 dolara, to nije moguće.
Žao mi je što nismo bili u mogućnosti da uradimo više, ali ćete bar sledeći put znati da budete oprezniji i možda ćete napraviti dodatne snimke ekrana. Čak i sa ovom neprijatnom situacijom, nadam se da nećete upasti u sličnu u budućnosti.
If you think an authority would support you, it would do so on the basis of evidence which, unfortunately, you do not possess, or is insufficient. If you simply accuse a casino of similar things and you have no relevant evidence to support your view, it is difficult to help you, even though we have tried. That way, a player could then come along and say that the casino did something wrong and we or the authority should be on the player's side, according to your thinking. This is not to say that we are taking sides one way or the other. But without proof of a $100 win, it's not possible.
I'm sorry we weren't able to do more, but at least next time you'll know to be more careful and maybe take some extra screenshots. Even with this unpleasant situation, I hope you don't get into a similar one in the future.