Pitanje o veb-sajtovima za kockanje sa licencom Curacao koji koriste netačan kod kategorije trgovca (strana 644)

Has anyone gone down the dispute route to claim these back?

I have mate, been transparent though about the nature of it but also been able to evidence request for safer gambling being ignored, withdrawal being rejected , merchants confirming no affiliation etc . banks seem to be more interested in the potential money laundering. One casino can use 30+ merchants world wide manipulating data which is trade mark layering.

Yeah I have loads for these on pixel*online. Can’t find anything

I didn't think raising a dispute would help in these scenarios.

Hopefully the charge back attempts are successful.

The point is that what they are doing is illegal. The merchants cannot and should be accept payments for a company they are not affiliated officially or provide a service too. When disputed they cannot provide evidence what they provide (some try to) but when challenge with the evidence of the transaction on the unregulated casino operating uk, it quickly moves to them being the ones attempting fraud. Like I said, its been a long drawn out process for me but recent media coverage and the implications for the Bank if they simple dismiss AML concerns without investigation, seems to gathering momentum.

I know people will pass opinion out situations, but actually I couldn’t care less. Fighting these scum on what they are doing and how they are operating and the vulnerable people they target has helped me realise the error of ways and I haven’t gambled since.

I put in a formal complaint to starling bank for not even attempting to raise disputes and received a message today from one of their complaints people asking what he can do to help and that he will listen. I don't know what to say, what I should do? Also the chargebacks are well over the 120 day period but according to MasterCard can go back 540 days in some cases of misrepresentation, should I include that?

If the casinos process the payments themselves

1.) they need a licence to get a gambling MCC

2.) they pay higher fees since it’s a riskier transaction

3.) they will face stricter regulatory requirements

4.) certain banks don’t allow gambling on their card/accounts, disguising them gets around that - dangerous for those with personal blocks set up

and of course they could just be hiding revenue.. but if we want to think best case scenario it’s cheaper for the transactions to be processed as low risk merchandise

LOM LIMASSOL anyone?

Does anyone have a contact for Estolio Limited?

Má někdo kontakt na Estolio Limited?

Write to me at

Napiš mi na madam.alexis@centrum.cz

At?

Hi can any of you give me contact details for buton please - I can see you have both dealt with them - would be really helpful - thank you 🙏

I don't have the data, it was resolved by a reverse charge at the bank. Despite the suspension. Only Buton. Only returned.

Údaje nemám, vyřešilo to zpětné zúčtování v bance. Přes visu. Pouze Buton.Jediny vrátil.

madam.alexis

center part

madam.alexis

centrum cz

Hey I got progress on this. Email me on rav12@hotmail.co.uk

Can help with payop and falcora- rav12@hotmail.co.uk

Urging anyone who needs support on falcora, payop, Noda and any Curacao casinos to reach out to me. I’ve finally gotten some good news!!!

Email me bud I finally got somewhere rav12@hotmail.co.uk