Poštovani Ironleg i predstavniku 22Bet kazina,
Ova situacija se ne dešava često; međutim, zabeležili smo nekoliko slučajeva gde je transfer novca neuspešan negde tokom procesa.
U ovom konkretnom slučaju, znamo da su sredstva poslata sa Ajronlegovog računa, ali nikada nisu stigla do računa kazina. Ajronleg je pružio dokaz da su sredstva stigla do trgovca; međutim, izgleda da to nije bila konačna destinacija. Drugim rečima, tok transakcije izgleda kao A → B → C, gde Ajronleg može da potvrdi da su sredstva uspešno dostavljena B, a B potvrđuje prijem, dok kazino potvrđuje da ih C nije primio.
U takvim situacijama, ne postoji jasna krivica. Igrači su razumljivo frustrirani, jer su poslali sredstva, dok kazina nisu spremna da ih kreditiraju jer uplata nije primljena.
Stoga, ove slučajeve procenjujemo na osnovu toka sredstava. U ovom slučaju, novac je poslat iz Ajronlega ka kazinu, ali nije stigao na račun kazina. Kao rezultat toga, ne možemo smatrati kazino odgovornim za ovu situaciju. (S druge strane, ako bi Ajronleg podizao sredstva i transakcija bi se izgubila na putu do njega, zatražili bismo da kazino ponovo pošalje uplatu.)
Šta se sada može učiniti?
Ajronleg može zahtevati od svoje banke da prati transakciju. Međutim, važno je osigurati da trag može da prati sredstva sve do konačnog odredišta, a ne samo do posrednika (B).
Kazino takođe može dati zvaničnu potvrdu da sredstva nisu primljena. Sa ovim dokumentom, Ajronleg može da zatraži od svoje banke da pokrene ili ponovo otvori istragu. Uz to, ovaj proces može i dalje biti komplikovan zbog strukture šeme dobavljača plaćanja i učešća posrednika.
Dear Ironleg and the 22Bet Casino Representative,
This situation does not occur frequently; however, we have recorded several cases where a money transfer failed somewhere along the process.
In this particular case, we know that the funds were sent from Ironleg’s account but never reached the casino’s account. Ironleg has provided proof that the funds reached the merchant; however, it appears that this was not the final destination. In other words, the transaction flow seems to be A → B → C, where Ironleg can confirm that the funds were successfully delivered to B, and B acknowledges receipt, while the casino confirms that C did not receive them.
In such situations, there is no clear party at fault. Players are understandably frustrated, as they have sent the funds, while casinos are not willing to credit them because the payment was not received.
Therefore, we assess these cases based on the flow of funds. In this instance, the money was sent from Ironleg toward the casino, but it did not reach the casino’s account. As a result, we cannot hold the casino responsible for this situation. (Conversely, if Ironleg were withdrawing funds and the transaction was lost on its way to him, we would request that the casino resend the payment.)
What can be done now?
Ironleg can request that his bank trace the transaction. However, it is important to ensure that the trace can follow the funds all the way to the final destination, not just to the intermediary (B).
The casino can also provide a formal confirmation that the funds were not received. With this document, Ironleg can ask his bank to initiate or reopen an investigation. That said, this process may still be complicated due to the structure of the payment provider scheme and the involvement of intermediaries.
Automatski prevedeno: