Ponovo smo otvorili ovu žalbu kako bismo igraču pružili jasnije i preciznije povratne informacije nakon njegovog zahteva na našem forumu za igrače.
Dragi Gento, pre svega, žao mi je ako moje objašnjenje nije bilo dovoljno jasno. Stvar je u tome što dokaze koje smo dobili od kazina smatramo najdovoljnijim za potvrđivanje slučajeva višestrukih naloga, stoga sam morao da odbijem vašu žalbu na osnovu njih, inače bi se stvorio presedan koji bi doveo u pitanje odluke donete u hiljadama prethodno odbijenih žalbi, tako da to jednostavno nije moguće.
Druga stvar koju želim da pomenem je razlog zašto ne mogu da podelim dokaze koje mi je kazino poslao. Ako bih ih podelio, najveći problem bi bio što biste ih mogli koristiti da zaobiđete ograničenja za više naloga u drugim kazinima, s obzirom da zaista imate više naloga.
Takođe, kada govorimo o verovatnoći da imate više naloga, 99% sam siguran da ih imate, s obzirom na to da vaša pitanja u temi žalbi i zahtevu za ponovno otvaranje ukazuju na vaše znanje o toj temi (korišćenje različitih uređaja, promene IP adresa), koje prosečan igrač ne bi imao, i ne bi to pomenuo u zahtevu za ponovno otvaranje. Umesto toga, prosečan igrač obično traži dodatnu pomoć ili resurse koje može da koristi da bi imao šansu da vrati svoja sredstva. Umesto da to uradite, vi ste samo dodatno pitali o specifičnostima dokaza.
Konačno, ako i dalje niste zadovoljni mojim odgovorom ili našom odlukom, možete podneti žalbu regulatornom telu. U slučaju 22 Bet, to je Komisija za igre na sreću Kahnavake, koju možete kontaktirati putem complaints@gamingcommission.ca Ako to učinite i dobijete odgovor od regulatora, molim vas da ga prosledite na moju imejl adresu: pavel.k@casino.guru , tako da mogu da promenim status žalbe u „Čeka se odluka regulatora".
Molim vas, javite mi ako imate još pitanja ili ako mogu da zatvorim žalbu.
We have reopened this complaint to give the player more clear and precise feedback following their request on our player's forum.
Dear Gento, first of all, I am sorry if my explanation was not clear enough. The thing is, the evidence which we received from the casino is considered by us to be the most sufficient in confirming cases of multiple accounts, therefore, I must have rejected your complaint based on it, doing otherwise would create a precedence which would call into questions decisions made in thousands of previously rejected complaints, so it is just not possible.
The second thing I want to mention is the reason why I cannot share the evidence the casino sent me. If I shared it the biggest problem would be that you could use it to bypass multiple accounts restrictions in other casinos, that given that you indeed have multiple accounts.
Also, speaking of probability of you having multiple accounts, I am 99% sure that you do, given that your questions in the complaint thread and reopen request indicate your knowledge on the subject (different devices usage, IP changes), which the usual player would not have, and would not have mentioned it in the reopen request. Instead, the average player usually asks for more help or resources which they can use to have a chance on returning their funds. Instead of doing so, you have just asked further on the specifics of the evidence.
Finally, if you are still not satisfied with my response or our decision, you can lodge a complaint with the regulator. In the 22 Bet's case it is Kahnawake Gaming Commission, which you can contact via complaints@gamingcommission.ca. If you will do so and receive a response from the regulator, please, forward it to my e-mail: pavel.k@casino.guru, so I can change the complaint status to "Waiting for the regulator's decision".
Please, let me know if you have any more questions or if I can close the complaint.
Automatski prevedeno: