Vaše objašnjenje potvrđuje upravo nedoslednost koju iznosim.
Navodite da:
Bonus bez depozita imao je pravilo za maksimalnu isplatu od 50 CAD
Kada sam završio klađenje, sistem je promenio moj saldo sa 220 CAD na 100 CAD u skladu sa tim pravilom.
Takođe potvrđujete da je klađenje u potpunosti završeno
Ovo prvo prilagođavanje je ključno.
U trenutku kada je klađenje završeno i moj saldo smanjen sa 220 na 100, uslovi bonusa su već bili u potpunosti primenjeni i iskorišćeni.
Od tog trenutka pa nadalje, 100 CAD više nije bio „potencijalni bonus dobitak". To je bio konačni dozvoljeni iznos nakon primene pravila o maksimalnoj isplati.
Drugim rečima, pravilo je već bilo primenjeno.
Nakon ovog podešavanja:
Pokušao/la sam podizanje novca (odbijeno za KYC)
Nastavio sam da igram
Uplatio/la sam pravi depozit od 20 CAD
Moj saldo je varirao u zavisnosti od igre, na kraju dostigavši oko 600 CAD
U ovoj fazi nije bilo preostalog bonus stanja, nije bilo aktivnog klađenja niti je bilo uslova za bonus na čekanju. Bonus je već bio zatvoren od strane vašeg sistema putem prvog smanjenja stanja.
Vaš odgovor kaže:
„Stanje je ostalo vezano za originalne uslove bonusa dok se ne zatraži i ne izvrši isplata"
Ovo je pogrešno na osnovu tvojih sopstvenih postupaka.
Da je to tačno, sistem ne bi smanjio stanje sa 220 na 100 prilikom završetka klađenja. To smanjenje dokazuje da je bonus ciklus završen u tom trenutku.
Ne možete oboje:
Primenite pravilo maksimalnog isplaćivanja kada se klađenje završi, i
Tvrdite da je pravilo još uvek bilo na čekanju kasnije prilikom povlačenja
To je logička kontradikcija.
Drugo smanjenje na 50 CAD je stoga druga primena istog pravila o bonusu na sredstva koja su već bila prilagođena i više nisu predmet bonusa.
Ovo je suštinski problem.
Pravilo o maksimalnoj isplati može se primeniti samo jednom na bonus dobitke. Ne može se ponovo primeniti kasnije na igru koja se odigrala nakon što je bonus finalizovan.
Pored toga, nakon ovoga sam uplatio pravi novac. Čak i po tvojim uslovima, kada se pravi novac pomeša sa stanjem nakon bonusa, naknadni dobici ne mogu ostati zauvek vezani za već potrošeni bonus.
Ako su ograničenja bonusa zaista ostala aktivna, onda:
prvo smanjenje nikada nije trebalo da se dogodi, ili
kasnije nije trebalo da dođe do daljeg smanjenja
Oba ne mogu biti istinita u isto vreme.
Stoga, drugo prilagođavanje nije sprovođenje uslova bonusa, već duplirana primena pravila koje je već bilo izvršeno.
Molim da se ovo ponovo pregleda, imajući u vidu činjenicu da je sistem već finalizovao bonus kada je smanjio stanje na 100 CAD nakon završetka klađenja.
Ta akcija je okončala životni ciklus bonusa
Your explanation confirms the exact inconsistency I am raising.
You state that:
The no-deposit bonus had a 50 CAD maximum cash-out rule
When I completed the wagering, the system adjusted my balance from 220 CAD to 100 CAD in accordance with that rule
You also confirm that wagering was fully completed
This first adjustment is crucial.
At the moment wagering was completed and my balance was reduced from 220 → 100, the bonus conditions had already been fully enforced and consumed.
From that point forward, the 100 CAD was no longer "potential bonus winnings". It was the final amount allowed after applying the maximum cash-out rule.
In other words, the rule had already been applied.
After this adjustment:
I attempted a withdrawal (refused for KYC)
I continued playing
I made a real money deposit of 20 CAD
My balance fluctuated based on gameplay, eventually reaching ~600 CAD
At this stage, there was no remaining bonus balance, no active wagering, and no pending bonus condition. The bonus had already been closed by your own system through the first balance reduction.
Your reply says:
"the balance remained linked to the original bonus conditions until a withdrawal is requested and completed"
This is incorrect based on your own actions.
If that were true, the system would not have reduced the balance from 220 to 100 at wagering completion. That reduction proves the bonus cycle had ended at that moment.
You cannot both:
Apply the maximum cash-out rule when wagering ends, and
Claim the rule was still pending later at withdrawal
That is a logical contradiction.
The second reduction to 50 CAD is therefore a second application of the same bonus rule on funds that were already adjusted and no longer subject to the bonus.
This is the core issue.
A maximum cash-out rule can only be applied once to bonus winnings. It cannot be re-applied later to gameplay that occurred after the bonus was finalized.
Additionally, I made a real money deposit after this. Even by your own terms, once real funds are mixed with a post-bonus balance, subsequent winnings cannot remain indefinitely tied to an already-consumed bonus.
If the bonus restrictions truly remained active, then:
the first reduction should never have occurred, or
no further reduction should have occurred later
Both cannot be true at the same time.
Therefore, the second adjustment is not an enforcement of bonus terms, but a duplicate application of a rule that had already been executed.
I am requesting that this be reviewed again with attention to the fact that the system already finalized the bonus when it reduced the balance to 100 CAD after wagering completion.
That action ended the bonus lifecycle
Automatski prevedeno: