Dragi crixuss123,
Pregledali smo ovu žalbu zajedno sa vašim drugim žalbama koje se tiču iste aktivnosti u nekoliko kazina unutar grupe.
U vašim ranijim žalbama, potvrdili ste da ste istovremeno igrali iste igre preko naloga u nekoliko ovih kazina. U toj fazi, ove informacije su već izazvale zabrinutost, ali nisu precizno objasnile kako je aktivnost sprovedena . Stoga smo nastavili istragu i zatražili dodatne dokaze od kazina. Međutim, u svim ovim slučajevima, kazina nisu bila u mogućnosti da dostave tražene dokaze - stoga smo ostali na vašoj strani i zalagali se u vašu korist, jer verujemo da kazina apsolutno treba da budu u stanju da dokažu bilo koje nepravilno postupanje igrača kada ih kažnjavaju.
U najnovijoj seriji žalbi, međutim, dali ste detaljnije objašnjenje. Potvrdili ste da ste, dok ste pokušavali da osvojite „plišanu igračku" preko jednog kazina, istovremeno kladili preko drugih kazina na to da li će taj isti pokušaj uspeti.
Uzimajući u obzir ove izjave zajedno, sada imamo dovoljno informacija da procenimo strategiju. Kladili ste se na događaj u kojem ste lično učestvovali i na čiji ishod ste mogli direktno uticati, dok ste koordinirali aktivnost na nekoliko kazino naloga. Ovo je stvorilo nepravednu prednost i ne može se smatrati običnom legitimnom igrom.
Činjenica da ste održavali samo jedan nalog u svakom kazinu ne menja ovaj zaključak. Problem nije konvencionalno korišćenje višestrukih naloga, već koordinisano korišćenje naloga u nekoliko kazina za klađenje na ishod sopstvene igre.
Priznajemo da smo u početku nastavili sa istragom povezanih žalbi jer tačna priroda strategije nije bila dovoljno utvrđena. Vaše naknadno detaljno objašnjenje sada je razjasnilo tu odlučujuću tačku. Ovaj zaključak se stoga odnosi na ovu žalbu i na ostale nerešene žalbe koje se tiču konfiskovanih sredstava u vezi sa istom aktivnošću.
Iz ovih razloga, smatramo da su zatvaranje računa i oduzimanje povezanih sredstava opravdani, a žalbe moraju biti odbačene.
Zaista mi je žao što vam nismo mogli dodatno pomoći.
Dear crixuss123,
We have reviewed this complaint together with your other complaints concerning the same activity across several casinos within the group.
In your earlier complaints, you confirmed that you played the same games simultaneously through accounts at several of these casinos. At that stage, this information already raised concerns, but it did not explain precisely how the activity was conducted. We therefore continued investigating and requested further evidence from the casinos. In all of these cases however, the casinos were unable to supply the requested evidence - we therefore remained on your side and argued in your favor, as we believe the casinos should absolutely be able to prove any player's wrongdoing when penalizing them.
In the newest batch of complaints, you however provided a more detailed explanation. You confirmed that while attempting to win the "plush toy" through one casino, you simultaneously placed bets through other casinos on whether that same attempt would succeed.
Considering these statements together, we now have sufficient information to assess the strategy. You were placing wagers on an event in which you were personally participating and whose outcome you could directly influence, while coordinating the activity across several casino accounts. This created an unfair advantage and cannot be regarded as ordinary legitimate gameplay.
The fact that you maintained only one account at each casino does not change this conclusion. The issue is not conventional multi-accounting, but the coordinated use of accounts across several casinos to bet on the outcome of your own gameplay.
We acknowledge that we initially continued investigating the related complaints because the exact nature of the strategy had not been sufficiently established. Your subsequent detailed explanation has now clarified that decisive point. This conclusion therefore applies to this complaint and to the other pending complaints concerning balances confiscated in connection with the same activity.
For these reasons, we consider the account closures and confiscation of the associated balances justified, and the complaints must be rejected.
I am truly sorry that we could not assist you further.
Automatski prevedeno: