Naslov žalbe: BC.GAME nije uspeo da sprovede moje samoisključenje na povezanim nalozima
Podnosim žalbu zbog odgovornog kockanja protiv BC.GAME.
Prethodno sam direktno od BC.GAME-a zatražio samoisključenje jer sam pretrpeo štetu povezanu sa kockanjem. Uprkos tom zahtevu, kasnije sam mogao da otvorim i koristim dodatne naloge, izvršim dodatne depozite i izgubim nekoliko hiljada evra.
Za ovu žalbu, privremeno sam uneo 3.000 evra kao sporni iznos. Ovo je konzervativna procena zasnovana samo na transakcijama trenutno dokumentovanim za moj poslednji nalog. Ukupan iznos može biti veći kada BC.GAME pruži kompletnu istoriju transakcija za sve povezane naloge.
Nalozi su koristili različite imejl adrese, ali su svi pripadali meni. Više puta im se pristupalo pomoću ista dva lična uređaja: mog Apple iPhone-a i Apple Mac-a. Takođe su korišćeni putem ponavljajućih internet konekcija i IP adresa.
Potpuna provera ličnosti korisnika (KYC) nije završena. Međutim, BC.GAME bi trebalo da sadrži tehničke i transakcione informacije koje mogu da identifikuju ili istraže veze između naloga, uključujući informacije o uređaju, istoriju IP adresa, podatke o pregledaču i sesijama, kolačiće, otiske prstiju uređaja, podatke o telefonu, adrese novčanika, evidenciju o prijavljivanju i aktivnost transakcija.
Takođe sam registrovan u italijanskom nacionalnom sistemu samoisključivanja ADM. Razumem da BC.GAME možda nije integrisan sa italijanskim registrom, ali sam posebno zatražio isključenje direktno od BC.GAME.
Nedavno sam kontaktirao podršku BC.GAME-a i jasno obavestio predstavnika da:
Doživljavao/la sam štetu povezanu sa kockanjem;
Prethodno sam tražio samoisključenje;
Naknadno sam kreirao i koristio dodatne naloge;
računi su pripadali istoj osobi;
Više puta sam koristio isti iPhone i Mac;
Izgubio sam nekoliko hiljada evra.
Takođe sam naveo relevantne imejl adrese i broj telefona.
Predstavnik podrške je prvobitno izjavio da su moja žalba i informacije o nalogu prosleđene timovima za rizik, usklađenost i odgovorno kockanje.
Predstavnik je kasnije promenio taj stav i izjavio da:
ne bi došlo do eskalacije jer je nalog povezan sa ćaskanjem bio zatvoren;
BC.GAME ne bi istraživao niti pomagao u vezi sa drugim nalozima;
Morao bih da pristupim svakom nalogu zasebno da bih zatražio zatvaranje;
moji zahtevi ne bi bili razmatrani jer više naloga krši Uslove korišćenja usluge;
BC.GAME ne prihvata nikakvu odgovornost.
Ne sporim da je višestruko korišćenje naloga zabranjeno. Međutim, ovo ne rešava pitanje odgovornog kockanja.
Ne tražim pristup bilo kom nalogu niti dozvolu za upravljanje višestrukim nalozima. Pitam zašto je igrač koji je prethodno zatražio samoisključenje kasnije mogao da kreira druge naloge, uplati značajna sredstva i nastavi sa kockanjem koristeći uređaje koji se stalno ponavljaju i internet konekcije.
Izgleda da se BC.GAME oslanja na svoje pravilo o višestrukim računima kako bi odbio moju žalbu, a zadržao depozite i gubitke generisane preko tih računa.
Podneo/la sam žalbu i kompletan transkript podrške pravnom, odeljenju za usklađenost i odgovorno kockanje BC.GAME-a, ali još uvek nisam dobio/la suštinski odgovor.
Molim:
istraga svih navoda koji su razumno povezani sa mnom;
očuvanje i ispitivanje uređaja, IP adrese, prijave, novčanika i zapisa o transakcijama;
potvrda datuma mog prvobitnog zahteva za samoisključenje;
kompletna finansijska istorija svih povezanih računa;
obračun i nadoknada neto gubitaka nastalih nakon mog zahteva za isključenje, ili razumno finansijsko poravnanje;
potvrda da su svi povezani nalozi trajno isključeni;
suštinski pisani odgovor od BC.GAME.
Mogu privatno da pružim Casino Guru-u imejl adrese naloga, broj telefona, snimke ekrana, transkript podrške, dokaze o transakcijama i sve dostupne dokaze o prethodnom zahtevu za isključenje.
Molim Casino Guru da kontaktira BC.GAME i posreduje u ovom sporu oko odgovornog kockanja.
Complaint title: BC.GAME failed to enforce my self-exclusion across connected accounts
I am submitting a responsible gambling complaint against BC.GAME.
I previously requested self-exclusion directly from BC.GAME because I was experiencing gambling-related harm. Despite that request, I was subsequently able to create and use additional accounts, make further deposits and lose several thousand euros.
For this complaint, I have provisionally entered €3,000 as the disputed amount. This is a conservative estimate based only on the transactions currently documented for my latest account. The total amount may be higher once BC.GAME provides the complete transaction history for all connected accounts.
The accounts used different email addresses but all belonged to me. They were repeatedly accessed using the same two personal devices: my Apple iPhone and Apple Mac. They were also used through recurring internet connections and IP addresses.
Full KYC was not completed. However, BC.GAME should hold technical and transactional information capable of identifying or investigating connections between the accounts, including device information, IP history, browser and session data, cookies, device fingerprints, telephone details, wallet addresses, login records and transaction activity.
I am also registered in the Italian ADM national self-exclusion system. I understand that BC.GAME may not be integrated with the Italian register, but I had separately requested exclusion directly from BC.GAME.
I recently contacted BC.GAME support and clearly informed the representative that:
I was experiencing gambling-related harm;
I had previously requested self-exclusion;
I had subsequently created and used additional accounts;
the accounts belonged to the same person;
I had repeatedly used the same iPhone and Mac;
I had lost several thousand euros.
I also provided the relevant email addresses and telephone number.
The support representative initially stated that my complaint and account information had been escalated to the Risk, Compliance and Responsible Gambling teams.
The representative later reversed that position and stated that:
no escalation would take place because the account connected to the chat had been closed;
BC.GAME would not investigate or assist with the other accounts;
I would have to access each account separately to request closure;
my requests would not be considered because multiple accounts violated the Terms of Service;
BC.GAME would accept no responsibility.
I do not dispute that multiple accounts are prohibited. However, this does not address the responsible gambling issue.
I am not requesting access to any account or permission to operate multiple accounts. I am asking why a player who had previously requested self-exclusion was subsequently able to create other accounts, deposit substantial funds and continue gambling using recurring devices and internet connections.
BC.GAME appears to rely on its multiple-account rule to reject my complaint while retaining the deposits and losses generated through those accounts.
I have submitted the complaint and complete support transcript to BC.GAME’s Legal, Compliance and Responsible Gambling teams, but I have not yet received a substantive response.
I request:
an investigation into all accounts reasonably connected to me;
preservation and examination of device, IP, login, wallet and transaction records;
confirmation of the date of my original self-exclusion request;
a complete financial history of all connected accounts;
calculation and reimbursement of the net losses incurred after my exclusion request, or a reasonable financial settlement;
confirmation that all connected accounts have been permanently excluded;
a substantive written response from BC.GAME.
I can privately provide Casino Guru with the account email addresses, telephone number, screenshots, support transcript, transaction evidence and any available evidence of the previous exclusion request.
I ask Casino Guru to contact BC.GAME and mediate this responsible gambling dispute.
Automatski prevedeno: