Dragi BetBeast kazino,
Hvala vam na imejlu.
Moram vas obavestiti da kada igrač zatraži samoisključenje, njegov nalog mora ostati trajno zatvoren, bez ikakve mogućnosti ponovnog otvaranja. Dana 23.12., igrač je zatražio zatvaranje svog naloga zbog problema sa kockanjem i čak je dobio potvrdu od vaše podrške da je nalog trajno zatvoren - kao što je i trebalo da bude.
Bez obzira na bilo kakve izjave, poruke ili tvrdnje koje je igrač eventualno dao nakon toga, nalog nikada nije trebalo ponovo da bude otvoren. Međutim, u ovom slučaju, igrač je uspeo da se samoisključi, a zatim ponovo otvori svoj nalog četiri puta u roku od nekoliko nedelja.
Ovo predstavlja ozbiljno kršenje standarda odgovornog kockanja i protivreči našim očekivanjima u vezi sa bezbednim okruženjem za kockanje.
Pored toga, pomenuli ste da ćete od sada tražiti od igrača da instaliraju BetBlocker i da nećete biti odgovorni za eventualne gubitke ako to ne urade.
Iako je pozitivno videti da je takva mera uključena u vaše procedure odgovornog kockanja, imajte na umu da je osnovna dužnost samog kazina da zaštiti igrače koji su zahtevali samoisključenje, umesto da se oslanja na spoljne programe.
Konačno, takođe ste izjavili da ćete izvršiti povraćaj novca u ovoj žalbi samo ako igrač instalira BetBlocker. Kao što je gore pomenuto, BetBlocker je zaista koristan alat za igrače koji se bore sa problemima sa kockanjem, i mi u Casino Guru-u ga takođe preporučujemo. Međutim, nije razumno uslovljavati rešavanje ove žalbe instaliranjem softvera treće strane od strane igrača.
Stoga, igrač ima pravo na povraćaj svih depozita izvršenih nakon prvog zatvaranja računa zbog problematičnog kockanja, umanjenih za eventualne isplate.
Dear BetBeast Casino,
Thank you for your email.
I must inform you that once a player requests self-exclusion, their account must remain closed permanently, without any possibility of being reopened. On 23/12, the player requested the closure of his account due to gambling problem and even received confirmation from your support that the account had been permanently closed - as it should have been.
Regardless of any statements, messages, or claims the player may have made afterward, the account should never have been reopened. In this case, however, the player managed to self-exclude and subsequently reopen his account four times within a few weeks.
This represents a serious breach of responsible gambling standards and contradicts our expectations regarding a safe gambling environment.
Additionally, you mentioned that from now on you will request players to install BetBlocker and that you will not be held responsible for any potential losses if they fail to do so.
While it is positive to see such a measure being incorporated into your responsible gambling procedures, please note that it is the casino’s own fundamental duty to protect players who have requested self-exclusion, rather than relying on external programs.
Finally, you also stated that you would only proceed with a refund in this complaint if the player installs BetBlocker. As mentioned above, BetBlocker is indeed a helpful tool for players struggling with gambling problems, and we at Casino Guru also recommend it. However, it is not reasonable to condition the resolution of this complaint on the player installing third-party software.
Therefore, the player is eligible for a refund of all deposits made after the first account closure due to problematic gambling, minus any withdrawals.
Automatski prevedeno: