Draga Dominika,
Hvala vam još jednom što ste odvojili vreme da ispitate moj slučaj.
Da ponovim i razjasnim osnovne zabrinutosti:
Potpuno sam KYC-verifikovan.
Nisam imao aktivne bonuse.
U prošlosti sam uspešno povlačeo novac.
Moj Revolut nalog i kartica su verifikovani i prihvaćeni za depozite.
Problem je počeo kada sam pokušao da povučem svoj dug i dobio nekoliko odbijanja, bez ikakvog jasnog ili doslednog objašnjenja. Više puta mi je naloženo da „ponovo unesem svoj IBAN" ili da će biti odobreno „u roku od tri sata", ali nikada nije dato upozorenje da Revolut metod možda neće biti prihvaćen za povlačenja — uprkos tome što je potpuno verifikovan i uspešno korišćen za depozite. Ovo je veoma obmanjujuće i postavlja pitanje: zašto verifikovati način plaćanja ako nije podoban ni za depozite ni za povlačenja? Ovo je trebalo da bude rešeno u procesu verifikacije da neću imati pravo na povlačenje ovom metodom.
Kao rezultat ove konfuzije, i nakon više neuspelih pokušaja, postajao sam sve više nesiguran i pod stresom zbog statusa svojih sredstava. Podrška kazina nije pružila nikakvu jasnoću, nikakvu direktnu komunikaciju sa menadžmentom, niti smernice. Dugotrajna neizvesnost izazvala je frustraciju, sumnju i na kraju impulsivno ponašanje. Verujući da su mi sredstva u suštini zaglavljena ili izgubljena, otkazao sam povlačenje i igrao sa njima. Ovo nije bila informisana ili namerna odluka - to je bila reakcija na nedostatak transparentnosti i emocionalni pritisak u okruženju kockanja.
Iako prihvatam odgovornost za otkazivanje povlačenja, kontekst i okruženje koje je kazino stvorio takođe moraju biti uzeti u obzir. Kazina imaju dužnost pažnje, posebno prema standardima licenciranja e-kockanja na Kurasau, da se prema igračima odnose pravedno, jasno komuniciraju i podržavaju odgovorno ponašanje u kockanju. Ovo se ogleda u članu 6 Kodeksa ponašanja Kurasaa, koji naglašava transparentnost i pravedno rukovanje sredstvima igrača.
Kao VIP kupac, očekivao sam viši nivo podrške i brige. Ponovljene neuspele isplate trebalo je da pokrenu proaktivnu reviziju ili barem neku vrstu menadžerske intervencije. Umesto toga, ostao sam sam da pogađam šta nije u redu — na kraju sam doneo odluku zbog koje sada žalim.
Ova situacija je stvorila osećaj nepoverenja i razočaranja, posebno imajući u vidu da je verifikovani način plaćanja (Revolut) legitimno korišćen, ali je ipak rezultirao uskraćivanjem pristupa sredstvima bez odgovarajućeg objašnjenja. Sama ta nedoslednost bi bila duboko zabrinjavajuća za svakog igrača - a kamoli za onog na VIP nivou.
S poštovanjem molim da se ovo pitanje proceni u svetlu odgovornosti licenciranih kazina da upravljaju sredstvima igrača sa jasnoćom, transparentnošću i pravednošću. Nadam se da će se uz pomoć Kazino Gurua ovo rešiti ne samo slovom pravila, već u skladu sa širim principima etičkog kockarskog poslovanja.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Dioniz
Dear Dominika,
Thank you once again for taking the time to look into my case.
To reiterate and clarify the core concerns:
I am fully KYC-verified.
I had no active bonuses.
I had made successful withdrawals in the past.
My Revolut account and card were verified and accepted for deposits.
The issue began when I attempted to withdraw my balance and received several rejections, without any clear or consistent explanation. I was instructed multiple times to "re-enter my IBAN" or that it would be approved "within three hours," but no warning was ever provided that the Revolut method may not be accepted for withdrawals — despite it being fully verified and successfully used for deposits. This is highly misleading, and raises the question: why verify a payment method if it is not eligible for both deposits and withdrawals?This should have been addressed in the verification process that i would not be eligible to withdraw with this method.
As a result of this confusion, and after multiple failed attempts, I became increasingly uncertain and stressed about the status of my funds. The casino’s support provided no clarity, no direct communication from management, and no guidance. The prolonged uncertainty triggered frustration, doubt, and eventually impulsive behavior. Believing my funds were essentially stuck or lost, I canceled the withdrawal and played them. This was not an informed or intentional decision — it was a reaction to a lack of transparency and emotional pressure in a gambling environment.
While I accept responsibility for canceling the withdrawal, the context and the environment created by the casino must also be taken into account. Casinos have a duty of care, particularly under Curacao eGaming licensing standards, to treat players fairly, communicate clearly, and support responsible gambling behavior. This is reflected in Article 6 of the Curacao Code of Conduct, which emphasizes transparency and fair handling of player funds.
As a VIP customer, I expected a higher level of support and care. Repeated failed withdrawals should have triggered a proactive review or at least some kind of managerial intervention. Instead, I was left alone to guess what was wrong — ultimately making a decision I now regret.
This situation has created a sense of mistrust and disappointment, especially considering that a verified payment method (Revolut) was used legitimately but still resulted in withheld access to funds without proper explanation. That inconsistency alone would be deeply troubling to any player — let alone one at VIP level.
I respectfully request that this matter be evaluated in light of the responsibilities of licensed casinos to manage player funds with clarity, transparency, and fairness. I am hopeful that with Casino Guru’s help, this can be resolved not just by the letter of the rules, but in line with the broader principles of ethical gambling operations.
Kind regards,
Dionysis
Automatski prevedeno: