Dragi kloobus87,
Hvala vam na odgovoru i na dostavljanju dodatnih detalja.
Nakon pažljivog pregleda svih informacija koje ste podelili, nažalost moramo da odbijemo ovu žalbu.
Prema vašem opisu, vaš nalog je ponovo otvoren nakon što ste dostavili izvod iz banke kako biste potvrdili svoj identitet. Iako se vaš prvobitni zahtev odnosio na dobijanje izvoda sa računa u skladu sa GDPR-om, dokument koji ste dostavili ispunio je preostali zahtev za verifikaciju. Kao rezultat toga, sistem kazina je ponovo označio vaš nalog kao verifikovan i aktivan. U takvim slučajevima, reaktivacija je obično automatski ishod nakon što se verifikacija identiteta uspešno završi.
Kasnije ste odlučili da se prijavite i aktivno igrate 13. februara. U tom trenutku, mogli ste da pristupite nalogu, uplatite depozit, igrate, otkažete isplatu i nastavite sa kockanjem. Ovo jasno ukazuje da je nalog bio potpuno dostupan i pod vašom kontrolom. Naknadni gubitak sredstava nastao je kao rezultat igranja nakon što ste dobrovoljno otkazali zahtev za isplatu.
Što se tiče dodatnog zahteva za verifikaciju adrese: kazina su obavezna da završe kompletne KYC (Poznaj svog klijenta) procedure pre obrade isplata, posebno kada su u pitanju veći iznosi. Nije neuobičajeno da operateri zahtevaju dodatnu dokumentaciju čak i ako je prethodno dostavljen izvod iz banke, posebno ako je raniji dokument korišćen za potvrdu identiteta i nije formalno odobren za verifikaciju adrese u okviru njihovog sistema usklađenosti. Zahtevanje dodatne dokumentacije pre odobravanja isplate od 2.500 evra je standardna regulatorna praksa i samo po sebi ne ukazuje na nepravedan tretman ili namerno odlaganje.
U vezi sa vašom zabrinutošću oko ponovnog otvaranja prethodno zatvorenog naloga: osim ako nalog nije zatvoren zbog formalno registrovanog problema sa kockanjem ili samoisključenja, kazinima je generalno dozvoljeno da ponovo otvore naloge na zahtev igrača. Nema naznaka da je vaš nalog imao aktivno samoisključenje ili blokadu kockanja u vreme ponovnog otvaranja.
Na osnovu dostavljenih dokaza, ne vidimo dovoljno osnova da zaključimo da je kazino postupio nepravedno ili namerno odložio vaše povlačenje zbog vašeg igračkog profila. Pošto je stanje izgubljeno nakon što ste dobrovoljno otkazali povlačenje i nastavili da igrate, nismo u mogućnosti da smatramo kazino odgovornim za te gubitke.
Zbog gore navedenih razloga, sada ćemo odbaciti ovu žalbu. Hvala vam na razumevanju. Iskreno mi je žao što nismo bili u mogućnosti da vam efikasnije pomognemo u ovoj konkretnoj situaciji, jer uvek težimo da pomognemo igračima da reše svoje probleme kad god je to moguće.
Molimo vas da imate u vidu da nas možete ponovo kontaktirati ako naiđete na bilo kakve probleme sa ovim ili bilo kojim drugim kazinom u budućnosti. Bilo da je u pitanju pitanje, nedoumica ili novi problem koji treba ispitati, naš tim je tu i spreman da vam pomogne.
Dear kloobus87,
Thank you for your reply and for providing additional details.
After carefully reviewing all the information you’ve shared, we unfortunately have to reject this complaint.
From your own description, your account was reopened after you provided a bank statement to confirm your identity. Even though your original request concerned obtaining an account statement under GDPR, the document you submitted fulfilled the outstanding verification requirement. As a result, the casino system marked your account as verified and active again. In such cases, reactivation is typically an automated outcome once identity verification is successfully completed.
You later chose to log in and actively play on February 13th. At that point, you were able to access the account, deposit, play, cancel your withdrawal, and continue gambling. This clearly indicates that the account was fully accessible and under your control. The subsequent loss of funds occurred as a result of gameplay after you voluntarily cancelled the withdrawal request.
Regarding the additional request for address verification: casinos are obligated to complete full KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures before processing withdrawals, especially when higher amounts are involved. It is not unusual for operators to request supplementary documents even if a bank statement was previously submitted, particularly if the earlier document was used for identity confirmation and not formally approved for address verification within their compliance system. Requesting further documentation before approving a €2,500 withdrawal is a standard regulatory practice and does not in itself indicate unfair treatment or deliberate delay.
Concerning your concern about reopening a previously closed account: unless the account was closed due to a formally registered gambling problem or self-exclusion, casinos are generally permitted to reopen accounts upon the player's request. There is no indication that your account had an active self-exclusion or gambling block in place at the time of reopening.
Based on the evidence provided, we do not see sufficient grounds to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or intentionally delayed your withdrawal due to your player profile. Since the balance was lost after you voluntarily cancelled the withdrawal and continued playing, we are unable to hold the casino responsible for those losses.
Due to the aforementioned reasons, we will now proceed to reject this complaint. Thank you for your understanding. I am genuinely sorry that we were not able to assist you more effectively in this particular situation, as we always aim to help players resolve their issues whenever possible.
Please remember that you are welcome to contact us again if you run into any problems with this or any other casino in the future. Whether it is a question, a concern or a new issue that needs to be looked into, our team is here and ready to support you.
Automatski prevedeno: