Draga Ana8,
Hvala vam na strpljenju i dodatnom objašnjenju.
Nakon pažljivog pregleda svih dostavljenih informacija i dokaza, moramo razjasniti jednu važnu tačku u vezi sa procedurama odgovornog kockanja i podobnošću za povraćaj novca.
Iako navodite da ste 5. novembra zahtevali samoisključenje, imejl koji ste poslali kazinu nije sadržao nikakvo eksplicitno pominjanje zavisnosti od kockanja, gubitka kontrole ili problema vezanih za kockanje. Sa stanovišta odgovornog kockanja, ova razlika je ključna. Kazina su obavezna da odmah deluju i primene stroge mere (uključujući razmatranje povraćaja novca) samo kada igrač jasno saopšti štetu ili zavisnost vezanu za kockanje.
Opšti zahtev za zatvaranje naloga ili samoisključenje bez navođenja problema sa kockanjem tretira se kao standardni zahtev za upravljanje nalogom. U takvim slučajevima, ne smatra se da je kazino prekršio obaveze odgovornog kockanja ako nalog ostane dostupan dok se zahtev pravilno ne obradi.
Što se tiče razgovora putem ćaskanja uživo u decembru, on se odigrao skoro mesec dana nakon vašeg prvobitnog imejla i stoga se ne može smatrati dokazom da je kazino bio svestan problema sa kockanjem u vreme kada su izvršeni naknadni depoziti. Nažalost, retrospektivna objašnjenja se ne mogu primeniti na ranije depozite.
Pošto u originalnom zahtevu za samoisključenje nije eksplicitno naveden problem sa kockanjem i kazino nije bio jasno obavešten o pitanjima odgovornog kockanja u to vreme, ne možemo smatrati kazino odgovornim za nastale gubitke i povraćaj novca ne može biti zatražen u vaše ime.
Razumemo da je ova situacija bila stresna i ne sumnjamo u vašu trenutnu uznemirenost. Međutim, na osnovu naših pravila i raspoloživih dokaza, žalba ne ispunjava kriterijume za uspešan ishod. Iz tih razloga, žalba će biti odbijena.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Veronika
Tim kazino gurua
Kao deo naše Globalne inicijative za samoisključivanje, udružili smo se sa BetBlocker-om, dobrotvornom organizacijom registrovanom u Velikoj Britaniji koja pruža besplatne usluge podrške ljudima širom sveta. Više informacija o našoj inicijativi možete pronaći ovde ( https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative ) i o BetBlocker- u ovde ( https://betblocker.org/ ).
BetBlocker, koji podržava sedam jezika, se brzo i lako instalira na više uređaja, za samo 2 minuta. Jednom instaliran, blokira pristup preko 84.230 veb-sajtova za kockanje i tiho radi u pozadini. Usluga se može koristiti anonimno i pomaže pojedincima da bezbedno i na odgovarajući način upravljaju svojim pristupom kockanju, bilo da to znači potpuno ograničenje ili ograničavanje pristupa tokom perioda ranjivosti.
Pored toga, BetBlocker uključuje listu od 824 sajtova sa informacijama o kockanju. Ovi sajtovi prvenstveno informišu korisnike o uslugama kockanja i reklamiraju ih. Možete da uključite ove sajtove u svoja ograničenja tako što ćete označiti polje. Međutim, ako imate tekuću žalbu protiv operatera kockanja, nemojte označiti ovo polje, jer će vam to sprečiti pristup i veb lokaciji Casino.Guru.

Dear Anna8,
Thank you for your patience and for the additional explanation.
After carefully reviewing all the information and evidence provided, we must clarify an important point regarding responsible gambling procedures and refund eligibility.
While you state that you requested self-exclusion on 5 November, the email you sent to the casino did not include any explicit mention of gambling addiction, loss of control, or gambling-related problems. From a responsible gambling standpoint, this distinction is crucial. Casinos are obligated to act immediately and apply strict measures (including refund consideration) only when a player clearly communicates gambling-related harm or addiction.
A general request for account closure or self-exclusion without stating a gambling problem is treated as a standard account management request. In such cases, the casino is not considered to be in breach of responsible gambling obligations if the account remains accessible until the request is properly processed.
Regarding the live chat conversation in December, this took place almost one month after your original email and therefore cannot be considered proof that the casino was aware of a gambling problem at the time when the subsequent deposits were made. Unfortunately, retrospective explanations cannot be applied to earlier deposits.
Since no gambling problem was explicitly stated in the original self-exclusion request and the casino was not clearly informed of responsible gambling concerns at that time, we are unable to consider the casino responsible for the losses incurred, and a refund cannot be requested on your behalf.
We understand that this situation has been stressful, and we do not doubt your current distress. However, based on our rules and the evidence available, the complaint does not meet the criteria for a successful outcome. For these reasons, the complaint will be rejected.
Best regards,
Veronika
Casino.Guru Team
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Automatski prevedeno: