Zdravo Veronika,
Hvala vam što ste nastavili da razmatrate ovu žalbu. Želeo bih da pružim potpuno i konačno pojašnjenje kako bih osigurao da je zapisnik tačan i sveobuhvatan.
Tip i kapacitet naloga
Imao sam samo običan igrački nalog. Nisam bio registrovan kao, niti sam delovao kao, strimer, pridruženi partner, VIP partner, zaposleni, izvođač radova ili u bilo kom profesionalnom ili komercijalnom svojstvu vezanom za Chips.gg. Moj nalog je korišćen isključivo za lično igranje kao običnog korisnika.
Odnos sa strimerima / trećim stranama
Lično poznajem nekoliko strimera sa Chips.gg, samo u društvenom i zajedničkom smislu. Nemam nikakav poslovni, finansijski, operativni ili odnos na nivou naloga ni sa jednim od njih. Niko nema pristup mom nalogu, sredstvima, igri ili donošenju odluka.
Nekoliko strimera i članova zajednice javno je komentarisalo situaciju nezavisno nakon što je postala poznata. Neki su naznačili da čekaju ishod ove žalbe pre nego što objave dalje. Nema koordinacije, deljenih naloga ili zajedničkih aktivnosti.
Odigrane igre i bonusi
Igrao sam standardne, javno dostupne kućne igre, prvenstveno igre u stilu Kenoa i Kockica.
Nisu korišćeni bonusi ni u jednom trenutku. Bonus bez depozita, bonus za klađenje, povraćaj novca ili promotivni uslovi su bili aktivni.
Pojašnjenje u vezi sa konačnim stanjem
Konačni iznos od približno 5.000 američkih dolara na mom računu je u potpunosti osvojen kroz igru Keno.
Konkretno, ovi dobici su rezultat dva standardna Keno dobitka od približno 2.500 dolara svaki, ostvarena nakon što je moj saldo smanjen na oko 300 dolara. To su bili uobičajeni ishodi prema objavljenim pravilima i isplatama igre.
Ova Keno sesija se odvijala nakon što su sredstva vraćena na moj račun nakon blokiranog povlačenja i dok su sve opklade prihvatane i poravnavane normalno od strane Chips.gg. Sesiju je uživo pratilo više ljudi, uključujući i nekoliko strimera, koji su bili samo gledaoci i nisu imali nikakvog učešća u igri ili pristupu nalogu.
Ovi dobici nisu povezani sa bilo kojim ranijim igranjem ili aktivnošću na koju se operater kasnije poziva kada navodi eksploat.
KYC, povlačenje sredstava i radnje na nalogu
Nakon što sam zatražio povlačenje sredstava, moj račun je stavljen na pregled i morao sam da završim KYC (poznaj svog klijenta). Tokom ovog procesa dobio sam suprotstavljene informacije:
Platforma je pokazala moj KYC status kao odobren
Podrška je kasnije izjavila da mi je KYC odbijen
Uprkos tome, isplata je ostala blokirana. Sredstva su potom vraćena na moj račun i dozvoljeno mi je da nastavim sa kockanjem koristeći isti iznos. Sve opklade postavljene tokom ovog perioda su prihvaćene i normalno izmirene.
Tek kasnije mi je nalog zabranjen, a preostali iznos konfiskovan. Prethodno nije primenjeno nikakvo upozorenje, ograničenje, privremena suspenzija ili ograničenje.
Ako bi kazino zaista verovao da je došlo do eksploatacije, dozvoljavanje nastavka igre sa istim sredstvima bilo bi u suprotnosti sa standardnim procedurama rizika, bezbednosti ili usklađenosti.
Navod o zloupotrebi i doslednost sprovođenja zakona
Chips.gg je kasnije tvrdio da sam koristio „eksploat", ali do danas nije pružio:
Konkretna klauzula Uslova korišćenja usluge koja je navodno prekršena
Bilo kakvo tehničko objašnjenje ili dokaz koji potkrepljuje tvrdnju
Svako prethodno upozorenje ili preventivna mera
Podaci o njihovom odobrenom dobavljaču usluga alternativnog rešavanja sporova (ARS)
Sve opklade su prihvaćene i normalno izmirene pre zahteva za povlačenje.
Koliko ja znam, nijedan drugi igrački nalog — uključujući naloge koji igraju iste igre na isti način — nije zabranjen niti im je stanje oduzeto u vezi sa ovom navodnom aktivnošću. Iako ne mogu da govorim o internim pregledima drugih naloga, ovo pokreće zabrinutost u vezi sa nedoslednim ili selektivnim sprovođenjem zakona, posebno tamo gde nije jasno identifikovano zabranjeno ponašanje.
Dostavljanje dokaza
Već sam prošle nedelje prosledio sve tražene materijale na vašu imejl adresu, uključujući kompletne transkripte ćaskanja, snimke ekrana (uključujući KYC status), detalje o povlačenju, obaveštenja o zabranama i kompletnu hronološku vremensku liniju. Molim vas da me obavestite ako je potrebno ponovo poslati neki određeni dokument.
Cenim vašu pomoć i radujem se pravednoj, nezavisnoj reviziji postupaka operatera u ovom slučaju.
Srdačan pozdrav,
wannabear
Hello Veronika,
Thank you for your continued review of this complaint. I would like to provide a complete and final clarification to ensure the record is accurate and comprehensive.
Account type and capacity
I held a regular player account only. I was not registered as, nor did I act as, a streamer, affiliate partner, VIP partner, employee, contractor, or in any professional or commercial capacity related to Chips.gg. My account was used solely for personal gameplay as an ordinary customer.
Relationship with streamers / third parties
I personally know a few Chips.gg streamers in a social and community sense only. I have no business, financial, operational, or account-level relationship with any of them. None have access to my account, funds, gameplay, or decision-making.
Several streamers and community members commented publicly on the situation independently after it became known. Some have indicated they are waiting to see the outcome of this complaint before posting further. There is no coordination, shared accounts, or joint activity involved.
Games played and bonuses
I played standard, publicly available house games, primarily Keno- and Dice-style games.
No bonuses were used at any time. No deposit bonus, wagering bonus, cashback, or promotional conditions were active.
Clarification regarding the final balance
The final approximately $5,000 USD₮ balance in my account was won entirely through Keno gameplay.
Specifically, these winnings resulted from two standard Keno wins of approximately $2,500 each, achieved after my balance had been played down to roughly $300. These were ordinary outcomes under the game’s published rules and payouts.
This Keno session occurred after the funds were returned to my account following the blocked withdrawal and while all bets were being accepted and settled normally by Chips.gg. The session was observed live by multiple people, including several streamers, who were spectators only and had no involvement in the gameplay or account access.
These winnings are unrelated to any earlier gameplay or activity later referenced by the operator when alleging an exploit.
KYC, withdrawal, and account actions
After requesting a withdrawal, my account was placed under review and I was required to complete KYC. During this process, I received conflicting information:
The platform showed my KYC status as approved
Support later stated that my KYC was denied
Despite this, the withdrawal remained blocked. The funds were then returned to my account, and I was allowed to continue gambling using the same balance. All bets placed during this period were accepted and settled normally.
Only later was my account banned and the remaining balance confiscated. No warning, restriction, temporary suspension, or limit was applied beforehand.
If the casino genuinely believed an exploit had occurred, allowing continued gameplay with the same funds would be inconsistent with standard risk, security, or compliance procedures.
Allegation of exploit and consistency of enforcement
Chips.gg later alleged that I used an "exploit," yet to date has not provided:
The specific Terms of Service clause allegedly violated
Any technical explanation or evidence supporting the allegation
Any prior warning or preventative action
Details of their approved Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) provider
All wagers were accepted and settled normally prior to the withdrawal request.
To my knowledge, no other player accounts — including accounts that play the same games in the same manner — have been banned or had balances confiscated in relation to this alleged activity. While I cannot speak to internal reviews of other accounts, this raises a concern regarding inconsistent or selective enforcement, particularly where no prohibited behavior has been clearly identified.
Evidence submission
I have already forwarded all requested materials to your email last week, including full chat transcripts, screenshots (including KYC status), withdrawal details, ban notifications, and a complete chronological timeline. Please let me know if any specific document needs to be resent.
I appreciate your assistance and look forward to a fair, independent review of the operator’s actions in this matter.
Kind regards,
wannanerd
Automatski prevedeno: