Pišem vam kako bih pružio konačno i precizno pojašnjenje činjenica u vezi sa tvrdnjom kompanije CoinCasino o „prevari identiteta", jer njihova izjava sadrži materijalnu netačnost.
Istorija verifikacije
Ja sam zakoniti vlasnik naloga i lično sam završio KYC verifikaciju koristeći svoje važeće lične dokumente. Verifikaciju mog identiteta je prvobitno odobrio CoinCasino, što je potvrđeno njihovim imejlom pod nazivom „Verifikacija identiteta uspešno završena – Spremni za igru?"
Proces verifikacije je kasnije ponovljen isključivo zato što je moj dokaz o adresi odbijen, a ne zbog bilo kakvog problema vezanog za identitet.
Pojašnjenje u vezi sa učešćem treće strane
Tokom ponovljenih pokušaja verifikacije, koristio sam telefon svog partnera zbog tehničkih problema sa mojim uređajem. Moj partner je bio prisutan i davao je samo usmene smernice, kao što su uputstva o tome kako da drži telefon da bi se postigao bolji kvalitet slike.
Ni u jednom trenutku moj partner nije:
Fotografiši me
Držite telefon tokom snimanja slike
Upravljajte kamerom
Pošaljite dokumenta u moje ime
Da se lažno predstavljaš kao ja na bilo koji način
Lično sam napravio sve fotografije i sam završio svaki korak KYC procesa.
Spor oko tvrdnje kompanije CoinCasino
Tvrdnja CoinCasino-a da je „druga osoba fotografisala vlasnika računa" je činjenično netačna. Prisustvo druge osobe koja pruža usmenu pomoć ne predstavlja učešće treće strane u verifikaciji identiteta, niti ispunjava definiciju prevare identiteta prema KYC ili AML standardima, koji zahtevaju lažno predstavljanje, falsifikovanje ili pogrešno predstavljanje identiteta.
Štaviše, CoinCasino nije naveo nijednu eksplicitnu klauzulu u svojim Uslovima i odredbama ili KYC uputstvima koja zabranjuje:
Korišćenje tuđeg uređaja za verifikaciju, ili
Prisustvo druge osobe i pružanje usmene pomoći tokom procesa.
Takvo ograničenje nije otkriveno ni u jednoj fazi.
Zaključak
S obzirom na to da:
Lično sam završio sve KYC korake,
Moj identitet je prethodno verifikovan i odobren,
Nije došlo do lažnog predstavljanja ili pogrešnog predstavljanja, i
Nije otkriveno eksplicitno pravilo koje zabranjuje ovo ponašanje,
S poštovanjem tvrdim da je tvrdnja o prevari identiteta neosnovana i zasnovana na pogrešnom tumačenju činjenica.
Pored toga, nakon zatvaranja mog naloga, kazino me nije kontaktirao, tražio bilo kakvo objašnjenje, niti je tražio dodatni dokaz o adresi ili obnovljenu KYC verifikaciju. Razlog za zatvaranje naloga je kasnije promenjen u odnosu na prvobitno objašnjenje. S obzirom na to da je moj dokaz o adresi (izvod iz banke) prvobitno odbijen bez ikakvog objašnjenja, sklon sam da verujem da kazino nije nameravao da mi isplati dobitke, već je umesto toga tražio alternativne razloge za opravdanje zatvaranja naloga.
I dalje sam potpuno spreman da završim dalju KYC verifikaciju pod jasno definisanim i transparentnim uslovima, ukoliko to bude potrebno.
Dao sam detaljna objašnjenja jer sam emocionalno slomljen ovim lažnim optužbama i oduzimanjem mojih sredstava. Osećam se duboko nepravedno, a moje ponovljene poruke bile su iskreni pokušaji da se potraži jasnoća i pravda.
Molim vas da imate u vidu da ova izjava odražava moj sopstveni prikaz događaja. Tekst sam napisao/la ja i gramatički ga usavršio/la uz pomoć veštačke inteligencije, jer engleski nije moj maternji jezik.
Hvala vam na vremenu i razmatranju.
Dodatno pojašnjenje u vezi sa dokazom o adresi
Prvobitno sam podneo izvod iz banke kao dokaz o adresi, koji je odbijen. Zatim sam priložio dokumentaciju koju je izdala vlada kojom se potvrđuje moja prijavljena adresa stanovanja, koja je takođe odbijena. Na kraju sam pronašao jedan od svojih računa za komunalne usluge i prosledio ga sa svoje imejl adrese; međutim, kasnije sam primetio da stanodavac nije naveo moje ime na tom konkretnom računu. Naknadni račun sadrži i moje ime i prezime, ali po mom mišljenju, takav račun koji je izdao stanodavac možda i dalje nije prihvatljiv.
Od samog početka sam obavestio CoinCasino da mi se računi za komunalne usluge ne šalju direktno poštom; šalju se ili imejlom ili ih stanodavac ostavlja u predvorju, jer živim u istoj kući. Takođe sam ponudio da dostavim ugovor o zakupu kojim potvrđujem da sam zakupac na ovoj adresi i da lično plaćam sve zakupnine.
Uprkos tome, kazino nije tražio nikakva dodatna objašnjenja ili prateću dokumentaciju nakon zatvaranja mog naloga, što dodatno ukazuje na to da nije postojala istinska namera da se završi proces verifikacije.
Račun za komunalne usluge dolazi od iste osobe, člana upravnog odbora kompanije sa kojom sam potpisao ovaj ugovor.
Hvala vam na vremenu i razmatranju.
I am writing to provide a final and precise clarification of the facts regarding CoinCasino’s allegation of "identity fraud," as their statement contains a material inaccuracy.
Verification History
I am the rightful account holder and personally completed the KYC verification using my own valid identification documents. My identity verification was initially approved by CoinCasino, as confirmed by their email titled "ID Verification Successfully Completed – Ready to Play?"
The verification process was later repeated solely because my proof of address was rejected, not due to any identity-related issue.
Clarification Regarding Third-Party Involvement
During the repeated verification attempts, I used my partner’s phone due to technical issues with my own device. My partner was present and provided verbal guidance only, such as instructions on how to hold the phone to achieve better image quality.
At no point did my partner:
Take photographs of me
Hold the phone during image capture
Operate the camera
Submit documents on my behalf
Impersonate me in any way
I personally took all photographs and completed every step of the KYC process myself.
Dispute of CoinCasino’s Claim
CoinCasino’s assertion that "another person was taking photos of the account holder" is factually incorrect. The presence of another person providing verbal assistance does not constitute third-party involvement in identity verification, nor does it meet the definition of identity fraud under KYC or AML standards, which require impersonation, falsification, or misrepresentation of identity.
Furthermore, CoinCasino has not cited any explicit clause in its Terms & Conditions or KYC instructions that prohibits:
Using another person’s device for verification, or
Having another person present and providing verbal assistance during the process.
No such restriction was disclosed at any stage.
Conclusion
Given that:
I personally completed all KYC steps,
My identity was previously verified and approved,
No impersonation or misrepresentation occurred, and
No explicit rule prohibiting this conduct was disclosed,
I respectfully submit that the allegation of identity fraud is unfounded and based on an incorrect interpretation of the facts.
Additionally, following the closure of my account, the casino did not contact me, request any explanation, or ask for further proof of address or a renewed KYC verification. The reason given for closing the account was later changed from the original explanation. Considering that my proof of address (a bank statement) was initially rejected without any explanation, I am inclined to believe that the casino did not intend to pay my winnings and instead sought alternative grounds to justify the account closure.
I remain fully willing to complete further KYC verification under clearly defined and transparent conditions, should this be required.
I have provided detailed explanations because I am emotionally devastated by these false accusations and the confiscation of my funds. I feel deeply wronged, and my repeated messages were genuine attempts to seek clarity and justice.
Please note that this statement reflects my own account of events. The text was written by me and grammatically refined with the assistance of artificial intelligence, as English is not my first language.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Additional Clarification Regarding Proof of Address
I initially submitted a bank statement as proof of address, which was rejected. I then attached government-issued documentation confirming my declared residential address, which was also rejected. Eventually, I located one of my utility bills and forwarded it from my email; however, I later noticed that the landlord had not included my name on that particular bill. A subsequent bill does include both my first name and surname, but in my opinion, such a bill issued by the landlord may still not be acceptable.
From the beginning, I informed CoinCasino that utility bills are not mailed directly to me; they are either sent by email or left by the landlord in the lobby, as I live in the same house. I also offered to submit a rental agreement confirming that I am the tenant at this address and that I personally make all rental payments.
Despite this, the casino did not request any additional explanations or supporting documents after closing my account, which further suggests that there was no genuine intention to complete the verification process.
The utility bill comes from the same person, a board member of the company with whom I have signed this contract
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Automatski prevedeno: