Poštovani kazino DirectionBet,
Hvala vam na odgovoru.
U potpunosti razumemo neophodnost da se omogući tehničko vreme za ručnu obradu zahteva za samoisključenje i podržavamo kazina u slučajevima kada se takve radnje preduzmu u razumnom roku. Međutim, u ovom konkretnom slučaju, zatvaranje igračevog naloga je trajalo tri nedelje, što je, iz naše perspektive, daleko van onoga što se može smatrati razumnim.
Kada kazino prizna da igrač ima problem sa kockanjem, ključno je preduzeti hitne i efikasne mere kako bi se sprečila dalja šteta povezana sa kockanjem - uključujući sprečavanje dodatnih depozita ili korišćenja postojećih sredstava. Kada kazino postane svestan igračevih problema sa kockanjem, preuzima odgovornost za zaštitu tog igrača od dalje štete.
U ovom slučaju, igrač je eksplicitno naveo svoj problem sa kockanjem i zatražio zatvaranje naloga u svom zahtevu za samoisključenje od 12. avgusta. Uprkos tome, nalog je ostao otvoren, omogućavajući nastavak igre.
Iz ovih razloga, smatramo da igrač treba da ima pravo na povraćaj gubitaka nastalih tokom perioda u kojem je kazino bio svestan igračevog problema sa kockanjem, ali nije preduzeo brze i odgovarajuće mere.
Ljubazno vas molim da dostavite kompletnu istoriju igranja igrača od 12. avgusta do datuma zatvaranja naloga. Molim vas da traženu datoteku pošaljete u CSV, XLSX ili drugom pogodnom formatu na moju imejl adresu jakub.m@casino.guru .
Hvala vam na saradnji i blagovremenoj pažnji posvećenoj ovom pitanju.
Dear DirectionBet Casino,
Thank you for your response.
We fully understand the necessity of allowing technical time for the manual processing of self-exclusion requests, and we support casinos in cases where such actions are taken within a reasonable timeframe. However, in this particular instance, the closure of the player’s account took three weeks, which, from our perspective, falls well outside what can be considered reasonable.
When a casino acknowledges that a player has a gambling problem, it is crucial to take immediate and effective action to prevent further gambling-related harm - including preventing additional deposits or use of existing funds. Once the casino is aware of the player’s gambling issues, it assumes responsibility for safeguarding that player from further harm.
In this case, the player explicitly stated his gambling problem and requested account closure in his self-exclusion request dated August 12. Despite this, the account remained open, allowing continued play.
For these reasons, we believe the player should be eligible for a refund of losses incurred during the period in which the casino was aware of the player’s gambling problem but failed to take prompt and appropriate action.
I kindly ask that you provide the player’s full gaming history from August 12 until the date of account closure. Please send the requested file in CSV, XLSX, or another convenient format to my email address at jakub.m@casino.guru.
Thank you for your cooperation and timely attention to this matter.
Automatski prevedeno: