Kazino: Donbet
Sporni iznos: 12.000 funti
Rezime žalbe:
Podnosim žalbu u vezi sa propustom kompanije Donbet da sprovede prethodno primenjeno samoisključenje, što je rezultiralo značajnim finansijskim gubitkom.
Ranije sam imao nalog kod Donbeta koji je bio potpuno verifikovan (završen KYC) i kasnije samoisključen zbog problema vezanih za kockanje. Ovo isključenje je zatraženo preko njihovog tima za podršku, u skladu sa njihovom politikom odgovornog kockanja, koja navodi da igrači mogu zahtevati samoisključenje na određeni period (od 6 meseci do 5 godina).
Uprkos tome, kasnije sam uspeo da registrujem novi nalog koristeći iste lične podatke, uključujući moje ime, datum rođenja, adresu i načine plaćanja. Zatim sam mogao da uplatim približno 12.000 funti na ovaj drugi račun. Nisam vršio nikakve isplate niti primao dobitke.
Donbet je odbio moj zahtev za povraćaj novca, pozivajući se na dva argumenta:
1. Da sam prekršio njihove Uslove korišćenja kreiranjem više naloga
2. Povraćaj novca nije moguć za depozite koji su odigrani
Međutim, ovi argumenti ne rešavaju suštinu problema.
Ključna stvar je da sam se već samoisključio sa platforme. Kada se samoisključenje zatraži i primeni, odgovornost je operatera da sprovede ovo ograničenje i spreči dalji pristup.
Da su Donbetove mere zaštite za samoisključenje bile pravilno primenjene, ne bih mogao da:
- Registrujte novi nalog koristeći isti identitet
- Proći sve provere verifikacije
- Uplatite depozit i nastavite sa kockanjem
Pored toga, Donbet je priznao da „neprovereni dupli nalozi mogu odložiti rano otkrivanje", što ukazuje na to da njihovi sistemi nisu blagovremeno identifikovali ili sprečili duplikat naloga.
Ovo nije slučaj prevare, dosluha ili pokušaja sticanja nepravedne prednosti. Sve aktivnosti su obavljene pod mojim pravim identitetom, koristeći moje sopstvene metode plaćanja, i nije bilo isplata.
Problem je neuspeh kontrole odgovornog kockanja i neuspeh u sprovođenju samoisključenja koje je već primenjeno.
Kazino se više puta oslanjao na standardne Uslove i odredbe i klauzule o politici povraćaja novca, bez rešavanja fundamentalnog neuspeha u sprečavanju samoisključene osobe da pristupi platformi i uplati sredstva.
Zahtevana rezolucija:
Tražim povraćaj depozita uplaćenih tokom perioda u kojem je trebalo da budem isključen.
Dostupni dokazi:
- Potvrda o prethodnom samoisključenju
- Dokaz o identičnim ličnim podacima na oba naloga
- Načini plaćanja koji se koriste u moje ime
- Kompletna prepiska sa kazinom
Spreman sam da dostavim svu prateću dokumentaciju na zahtev.
Casino: Donbet
Disputed Amount: £12,000
Summary of Complaint:
I am submitting a complaint regarding a failure by Donbet to enforce a previously applied self-exclusion, which resulted in significant financial loss.
I previously held an account with Donbet which was fully verified (KYC completed) and later self-excluded due to gambling-related concerns. This exclusion was requested via their support team, in line with their Responsible Gambling policy, which states that players may request self-exclusion for a defined period (6 months to 5 years).
Despite this, I was subsequently able to register a new account using the same personal details, including my name, date of birth, address, and payment methods. I was then able to deposit approximately £12,000 on this second account. I did not make any withdrawals or receive any winnings.
Donbet has denied my refund request, relying on two arguments:
1. That I breached their Terms & Conditions by creating multiple accounts
2. That refunds are not available for deposits that have been played
However, these arguments do not address the core issue.
The key point is that I had already self-excluded from the platform. Once self-exclusion is requested and applied, it is the operator’s responsibility to enforce this restriction and prevent further access.
If Donbet’s self-exclusion safeguards had been properly implemented, I would not have been able to:
- Register a new account using the same identity
- Pass any verification checks
- Deposit and continue gambling
Additionally, Donbet has acknowledged that "unverified duplicate accounts may delay early detection," which indicates that their systems did not identify or prevent the duplicate account in a timely manner.
This is not a case involving fraud, collusion, or an attempt to gain an unfair advantage. All activity was conducted under my real identity, using my own payment methods, and no withdrawals were made.
The issue is a failure of responsible gambling controls and a failure to enforce a self-exclusion that had already been applied.
The casino has repeatedly relied on standard Terms & Conditions and refund policy clauses, without addressing the fundamental failure to prevent a self-excluded individual from accessing the platform and depositing funds.
Requested Resolution:
I am requesting a refund of deposits made during the period in which I should have been excluded.
Evidence available:
- Confirmation of prior self-exclusion
- Proof of identical personal details across both accounts
- Payment methods used in my own name
- Full correspondence with the casino
I am willing to provide all supporting documentation upon request.
Automatski prevedeno: