Poštovani gospodine/gospođo,
Podnosim ovu zvaničnu žalbu u vezi sa ozbiljnim kršenjem propisa o licenciranju i obaveza odgovornog kockanja od strane vašeg licenciranog operatera.
Izričito sam zahtevao trajno doživotno samoisključenje, bez ikakve mogućnosti ponovnog otvaranja mog naloga — ikada. Ovaj zahtev sam podneo više puta, a vaši predstavnici su mi dali čvrsta pisana uveravanja da će moj nalog biti trajno zatvoren i da se nikada više neće moći ponovo otvoriti.
Uprkos ovim uveravanjima, moj nalog je ponovo otvoren otprilike sat vremena kasnije, bez ikakve verifikacije ili komunikacije sa vaše strane. Kao rezultat toga, ponovo sam mogao da pristupim nalogu i izgubio sam oko 500 evra. Ovo je jasno i direktno kršenje obaveza odgovornog kockanja i vaših sopstvenih navedenih politika.
Vaše osoblje je takođe izjavilo da neće biti izvršen povraćaj novca. Stoga formalno zahtevam nadoknadu od približno 500 evra izgubljenih nakon što je moj račun pogrešno ponovo otvoren. Ovaj povraćaj novca je jedina nadoknada koju tražim.
Pored toga, imam razloga da verujem da je operater pogrešno predstavio informacije u vezi sa vrednostima RTP-a (povraćaj igraču). Kazino je tvrdio da Play'n GO određuje podešavanja RTP-a i da operater nema kontrolu nad njima. Međutim, prema Play'n GO, svaki kazino nezavisno bira svoju RTP verziju. Operator takođe tvrdi da koristi verziju od 96%, ali dokazi ukazuju na to da se mogu koristiti verzije sa nižim RTP-om, posebno za slotove Pragmatic Play.
Stoga zahtevam da licencirajuće telo ili Kazino Guru dalje ispitaju ova pitanja.
Iako je okvir za licenciranje Kurasaa (LOK – Nacionalna uredba o igrama na sreću) nedavno ojačan kako bi se sprečilo takvo nedolično ponašanje, očigledno je da određeni operateri i dalje zanemaruju ove obaveze. Čini se da je ovaj kazino jedan od njih.
Shodno tome, javno podnosim ovu žalbu Casino Guru-u, vašem dobavljaču licenci i AskGamblers-u na pregled i objavljivanje.
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am submitting this formal complaint concerning serious breaches of licensing regulations and responsible gambling obligations by your licensed operator.
I explicitly requested a permanent lifetime self-exclusion, without any possibility of reopening my account — ever. I made this request multiple times, and your representatives gave me firm written assurances that my account would be permanently closed and could never be reopened.
Despite these assurances, my account was reopened approximately one hour later, without any verification or communication from your side. As a result, I was able to access the account again and lost around €500. This is a clear and direct violation of responsible gambling commitments and of your own stated policies.
Your staff have also stated that no refund will be issued. I therefore formally demand reimbursement of the approximately €500 lost after my account was wrongfully reopened. This refund is the sole compensation I am requesting.
In addition, I have reason to believe that the operator has misrepresented information regarding RTP (Return to Player) values. The casino claimed that Play’n GO determines the RTP settings and that the operator has no control over them. However, according to Play’n GO, each casino independently selects its RTP version. The operator also claims to use the 96% version, but evidence suggests that lower RTP versions may be in use, particularly for Pragmatic Play slots.
I therefore request that the licensing authority or Casino Guru investigate these issues further.
Although Curacao’s licensing framework (LOK – National Ordinance on Games of Chance) has recently been strengthened to prevent such misconduct, it is evident that certain operators continue to disregard these obligations. This casino appears to be one of them.
Accordingly, I am submitting this complaint publicly to Casino Guru, your licensing provider, and AskGamblers for review and publication.
Automatski prevedeno: