REZIME ŽALBE
Frešbet je konfiskovao moj legitimni dobitak od 2.402 evra i sada pokušava da zatvori moj nalog nakon što je zadržao ta sredstva, navodeći nejasne i neosnovane tvrdnje o kršenju Uslova i odredbi.
---
POTPUNI IZVEŠTAJ O DOGAĐAJIMA
Otvorio sam nalog kod Freshbet-a i uplatio depozit od 300€. Igrao sam i akumulirao dobitke, čime je moje stanje dostiglo 2.402€. Podneo sam zahtev za isplatu punog iznosa.
Pre nego što je isplata obrađena, kontaktirao me je Freshbet-ov KYC tim i zamolio me da završim verifikaciju identiteta. U potpunosti sam se složio — uključujući slanje video verifikacije sa mojim ličnim dokumentom i pisane napomene kako je traženo. Moj KYC je uspešno završen.
Uprkos tome što sam prošao potpunu KYC verifikaciju, Freshbet me je naknadno obavestio da će moj nalog biti trajno zatvoren zbog navodnog kršenja odeljaka 9 i 10 njihovih Uslova i odredbi, posebno pozivajući se na njihovu Politiku protiv prevara (dosluh, nefer strategija) i Uslove korišćenja naloga (pristup trećih lica). Moje povlačenje od 2.402€ je otkazano i ta sredstva su konfiskovana.
Tada mi je rečeno da mogu da podignem samo svoj prvobitni depozit od 300 evra, umanjen za naknadu za „obradu transakcije" od 20% — što ostavlja saldo od 240 evra.
---
ZAŠTO JE OVA ŽALBA OPRAVDANA
1. NISU DOSTAVLjENI DOKAZI
Uprkos višestrukim formalnim zahtevima u tri imejl razmene sa KYC timom i imenovanim službenikom za usklađenost (Teo Morgan), Freshbet nije pružio nijedan konkretan dokaz koji bi potkrepio tvrdnju o prevari — nema datuma, nema obeleženih transakcija, nema IP podataka, nema otisaka uređaja, ništa. Samo su citirali opšte klauzule o politici.
2. POPUNjAVANjE KYC-a PODRIVA TVRDNjU O PREVARI
Frešbet je zahtevao i prihvatio potpunu KYC verifikaciju od mene, uključujući video identifikaciju. Da je postojala stvarna zabrinutost zbog prevare ili pristupa nalogu treće strane, popunjavanje KYC-a bi to identifikovalo. Činjenica da su prošli moj KYC, a zatim konfiskovali dobitke je kontradiktorna i sugeriše da tvrdnja nije izneta u dobroj veri.
3. NAKNADA OD 20% JE NEOPRAVDANA
Paušalni odbitak od 20% na depozit — koji iznosi 60 evra — opisan je kao „trošak obrade transakcije". Nije data nikakva stavka. Ova naknada nema osnovu u standardnim naknadama za obradu plaćanja i čini se da je kazna primenjena bez ugovornog opravdanja.
4. Zahtev za pristup subjekta GDPR-a je ignorisan
Podneo/la sam formalni zahtev za pristup podacima u skladu sa članom 15 Opšte uredbe o zaštiti podataka (GDPR), zahtevajući sve lične podatke i evidenciju o mom nalogu. Ovaj zahtev je podnet dva puta i nije potvrđen niti obrađen ni u jednom odgovoru kompanije Freshbet.
5. DOBITCI — NE BONUS SREDSTVA
Zadržanih 2.402 evra predstavlja dobitke od pravog novca od igranja, a ne bonus sredstva koja podležu uslovima klađenja. Ovde nema spora oko bonusa. Freshbet zadržava legitimne dobitke na osnovu tvrdnji koje odbijaju da potkrepe.
---
ISTORIJA PREPISKE
- E-pošta 1: Freshbet KYC tim me obaveštava o zatvaranju naloga (nije naveden razlog osim „odeljaka 9 i 10")
- E-pošta 2: Zahtevam konkretne dokaze, potpuno vraćanje stanja i podnošenje GDPR SAR-a
- E-pošta 3: Freshbet KYC tim (Meredith) odgovara bez dokaza, preusmerava na e-poštu o usklađenosti
- E-pošta 4: Formalno osporavam, postavljam rok od 5 dana, obaveštavam o nameri eskalacije
- E-pošta 5: Službenik za usklađenost Teo Morgan odgovara pozivajući se na opšte klauzule politike, odbija povraćaj novca, nudi samo isplatu od 240€
- E-pošta 6: Odgovaram tražeći detaljne dokaze, usklađenost sa SAR-om i potpuni balans
Sva prepiska je dostupna i može se dostaviti na zahtev.
---
TRAŽENO REŠENjE
Molim:
1. Puna isplata mog konfiskovanog dobitka od 2.402€
2. Povraćaj 60€ odbijenih od mog depozita (neopravdana naknada od 20%)
3. Usklađenost sa mojim zahtevom za pristup podacima u skladu sa Opštom uredbom o zaštiti podataka (GDPR)
Ukupan traženi iznos: približno 2.402€
SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT
Freshbet has confiscated my legitimate winnings of 2,402€ and is now attempting to close my account after retaining those funds, citing vague and unsubstantiated allegations of Terms and Conditions violations.
---
FULL ACCOUNT OF EVENTS
I opened an account with Freshbet and made a deposit of 300€. I played and accumulated winnings, bringing my balance to 2,402€. I submitted a withdrawal request for the full amount.
Before the withdrawal was processed, I was contacted by Freshbet's KYC team and asked to complete identity verification. I complied in full — including submitting a video verification with my ID and a written note as requested. My KYC was successfully completed.
Despite passing full KYC verification, Freshbet subsequently informed me that my account would be permanently closed due to alleged violations of sections 9 and 10 of their Terms and Conditions, specifically referencing their Anti-Fraud Policy (collusion, unfair strategy) and Account Usage terms (third-party access). My withdrawal of 2,402€ was cancelled and those funds were confiscated.
I was then told I could withdraw only my original deposit of 300€, minus a 20% "transaction processing" fee — leaving a balance of 240€.
---
WHY THIS COMPLAINT IS JUSTIFIED
1. NO EVIDENCE PROVIDED
Despite multiple formal requests across three email exchanges with both the KYC team and a named Compliance Officer (Theo Morgan), Freshbet has not provided a single piece of specific evidence to support the fraud allegation — no dates, no flagged transactions, no IP data, no device fingerprints, nothing. They have only quoted general policy clauses.
2. KYC COMPLETION UNDERMINES THE FRAUD CLAIM
Freshbet required and accepted full KYC verification from me, including video ID. If there were genuine concerns about fraud or third-party account access, completing KYC would have identified this. The fact that they passed my KYC and then confiscated winnings is contradictory and suggests the allegation is not made in good faith.
3. THE 20% FEE IS UNJUSTIFIABLE
A flat 20% deduction on a deposit — amounting to 60€ — has been described as a "transaction processing cost." No itemisation has been provided. This charge has no basis in standard payment processing fees and appears to be a penalty applied without contractual justification.
4. GDPR SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST IGNORED
I submitted a formal Subject Access Request under Article 15 of the GDPR requesting all personal data and account records held on me. This has been submitted twice and has not been acknowledged or addressed in any of Freshbet's responses.
5. WINNINGS — NOT BONUS FUNDS
The 2,402€ withheld represents real-money winnings from gameplay, not bonus funds subject to wagering conditions. There is no bonus dispute here. Freshbet is retaining legitimate winnings on the basis of allegations they refuse to substantiate.
---
CORRESPONDENCE HISTORY
- Email 1: Freshbet KYC team informs me of account closure (no reason given beyond "sections 9 and 10")
- Email 2: I request specific evidence, full balance restoration, and submit GDPR SAR
- Email 3: Freshbet KYC team (Meredith) replies with no evidence, redirects to compliance email
- Email 4: I formally dispute, set 5-day deadline, notify of escalation intent
- Email 5: Compliance Officer Theo Morgan replies citing general policy clauses, denies refund, offers 240€ withdrawal only
- Email 6: I respond requesting itemised evidence, SAR compliance, and full balance
All correspondence is available and can be provided upon request.
---
RESOLUTION SOUGHT
I am requesting:
1. Full payment of my confiscated winnings of 2,402€
2. Return of the 60€ deducted from my deposit (the unjustified 20% fee)
3. Compliance with my GDPR Subject Access Request
Total amount sought: approximately 2,402€
Automatski prevedeno: