Draga Jana i timu kazina Green Luck,
Pre svega, želeo bih da kazino navede u ovoj javnoj temi:
Koja institucija za igre na sreću vam je izdala licencu?
Koji je vaš broj licence?
Gde se ova licenca može nezavisno proveriti?
Ovo je važno jer vašu odluku o konfiskaciji mog stanja mora da preispita regulator, a ja imam pravo da znam ko od njih nadgleda vaše poslovanje.
Što se tiče vaše izjave, želim da se osvrnem na nekoliko tačaka:
U vezi sa „zahtevom podnetim u martu 2026.": Tvrdite da su dokumenti traženi putem odeljka za verifikaciju. Nečujna zastavica unutar portala naloga nije pravilno preneti zahtev. Nije poslata e-pošta, nije dato obaveštenje putem ćaskanja uživo, a kada sam direktno pitao podršku u februaru da li je potrebna provera ličnosti (KYC), eksplicitno mi je rečeno da je kašnjenje samo zbog velikog obima plaćanja i da nije potrebna verifikacija. Vaši agenti su protivrečili zahtevu na koji se sada oslanjate. Prema vašim sopstvenim Uslovima i odredbama 5.3, period od 30 dana počinje „nakon što je zahtev podnet". Zahtev koji podrška odbija postoji kada je direktno postavljen ne može se smatrati podnetim.
U vezi sa Uslovima i odredbama 9.4: Ova klauzula zahteva „razumnu sumnju na prevaru, nezakonitu ili nepravilnu aktivnost". Niste izneli takvu sumnju niti dokaze o bilo kakvoj takvoj. Moj navodni propust jeste neodgovaranje na zahtev za verifikaciju o kome nikada nisam bio pravilno obavešten. To spada pod 5.3, a ne 9.4. Klauzula 5.3 vam dozvoljava da zadržite isplatu i zatvorite račun, ali ne ovlašćuje konfiskaciju legitimnog stanja. Primenjujete klauzulu o prevari na igrača koga ne optužujete za prevaru, isključivo da biste opravdali zadržavanje 2.354 evra.
Što se tiče nedoslednosti: Uplatili ste mi isplatu od 500 evra 20. februara. Prihvatili ste moje podatke o elektronskom novčaniku i istoriju TRX-a. Delimična verifikacija je očigledno funkcionisala. Ako je dokaz o identitetu zaista bio izuzetan i važan, ispravna akcija je bila da se zamrzne stanje i pošalje mi imejl sa zahtevom za jasnim dokumentima, a ne da se isplata ostavi na čekanju duže od dva meseca, a zatim sve konfiskuje.
Ponavljam svoju ponudu: ponovo otvorite nalog ili portal za verifikaciju i odmah ću poslati dokaz o identitetu. Nikada nisam odbio verifikaciju. Oduzimanje sredstava od igrača koji aktivno traži verifikaciju nije KYC mera, već je zaplena stanja.
Ako kazino nije voljan da ovo reši ovde, molim vas da potvrdite proceduru za žalbe vašeg regulatora kako bih mogao formalno da eskaliram.
Srdačan pozdrav
Dear Jana and Green Luck Casino Team,
Before anything else, I would like the casino to state on this public thread:
Which gaming authority issued your license?
What is your license number?
Where can this license be independently verified?
This is important because your decision to confiscate my balance must be reviewable by a regulator, and I am entitled to know which one oversees your operations.
Regarding your statement, I want to address several points:
On the "request made in March 2026": You claim documents were requested via the Verification section. A silent flag inside an account portal is not a properly communicated request. No email was sent, no live chat notification was given, and when I directly asked support in February whether KYC was needed, I was explicitly told the delay was only due to high payment volume and that no verification was required. Your own agents contradicted the request you now rely on. Under your own T&C 5.3, the 30-day period starts "after the request is made." A request that support denies exists when directly asked cannot be considered made.
On T&C 9.4: This clause requires "reasonable suspicion of fraud, illegal or improper activity." You have presented no such suspicion and no evidence of any. My alleged failure is not responding to a verification request I was never properly notified of. That falls under 5.3, not 9.4. Clause 5.3 permits you to withhold payment and close the account, but it does not authorize confiscation of a legitimate balance. You are applying a fraud clause to a player you do not accuse of fraud, purely to justify keeping €2,354.
On the inconsistency: You paid my €500 withdrawal on 20 February. You accepted my e-wallet information and TRX history. Partial verification was clearly functioning. If proof of identity was genuinely outstanding and critical, the correct action was to freeze the balance and email me a clear document request, not to leave a withdrawal pending for over two months and then confiscate everything.
I repeat my offer: reopen the account or the verification portal and I will submit my proof of identity immediately. I have never refused verification. Confiscating funds from a player who is actively asking to verify is not a KYC measure, it is a balance seizure.
If the casino is unwilling to resolve this here, please confirm your regulator's complaint procedure so I can escalate formally.
Best regards
Automatski prevedeno: