Hvala vam što ste pregledali ovaj slučaj.
Želeo bih da razjasnim nekoliko važnih tačaka u vezi sa vremenskim rokom i mojim zahtevima za samoisključenje.
Prvo, u vezi sa avgustom 2024. godine — tačno je da sam pojasnio da se moja ranija poruka o problemima sa kockanjem odnosila na drugog operatera. Stoga razumem da se ova konkretna tema može smatrati zatvorenom.
Međutim, ključno pitanje se tiče oktobra 2024. godine.
U oktobru 2024. godine, ponovo sam eksplicitno kontaktirao Megapari, ovog puta preko njihove namenske adrese e-pošte za blokiranje ( block@megapari ), jasno navodeći da imam problem sa kockanjem i zahtevajući trenutno zatvaranje naloga. Moja poruka je bila nedvosmislena: Jasno sam tražio da mi se nalog blokira zbog problema sa kockanjem i izjavio da je njihova odgovornost da nastave sa zatvaranjem.
Da, u avgustu 2024. godine sam napisao da je poruka bila greška. Međutim, dva meseca kasnije sam podneo još jedan izveštaj odeljenju zaduženom za blokiranje.
Pored toga, pre slanja imejla, prvo sam pokušao da zahtevam blokiranje naloga putem ćaskanja uživo. Podrška putem ćaskanja me je obavestila da ne mogu direktno da obrade zahtev za zatvaranje i uputila me je da umesto toga pošaljem imejl. Ovo je izazvalo dodatno kašnjenje u sprovođenju samoisključivanja.
Uprkos mojoj jasnoj izjavi o problemima sa kockanjem u oktobru 2024. godine, umesto da mi odmah zatvori nalog, operater mi je ponudio besplatnu opkladu od 400 PLN. Verujem da je nuđenje bonusa igraču koji eksplicitno izjavi problem sa kockanjem u suprotnosti sa principima odgovornog kockanja.
Nalog nije odmah zatvoren i blokiran je tek nakon što sam poslao više dodatnih imejlova.
Po mom mišljenju, od trenutka moje poruke iz oktobra 2024. godine u kojoj sam jasno naveo da imam problem sa kockanjem i zahtevao zatvaranje naloga, operater je trebalo da:
- Odmah sprovedeno samoisključenje,
- Uzdržao se od nuđenja bilo kakvih promocija ili bonusa,
- Slučaj je tretiran kao hitan u skladu sa politikom odgovornog kockanja.
Interna razlika između različitih imejl adresa (support@ naspram block@) ne bi trebalo da utiče na odgovornost operatera da zaštiti ranjivog igrača. U pitanju je ista kompanija i isti igrački nalog.
S poštovanjem vas molim da procenite slučaj prvenstveno na osnovu komunikacije iz oktobra 2024. godine, jer je to bila jasna i eksplicitna izjava o šteti povezanoj sa kockanjem i direktan zahtev za zatvaranje računa.
Hvala vam na vremenu i pomoći.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Thank you for reviewing this case.
I would like to clarify several important points regarding the timeline and my self-exclusion requests.
First, regarding August 2024 — it is correct that I clarified that my earlier message about gambling problems was related to another operator. Therefore, I understand that this particular thread may be considered closed.
However, the key issue concerns October 2024.
In October 2024, I explicitly contacted Megapari again, this time via their dedicated blocking email address (block@megapari), clearly stating that I have a gambling problem and requesting immediate account closure. My message was unambiguous: I clearly asked for my account to be blocked due to gambling issues and stated that it was their responsibility to proceed with the closure.
Yes, in August 2024, I wrote that the message was a mistake. However, I submitted another report two months later to the department responsible for blocking
Additionally, before sending the email, I initially tried to request account blocking through live chat. The chat support informed me that they could not process the closure request directly and instructed me to send an email instead. This caused an additional delay in implementing the self-exclusion.
Despite my clear declaration of gambling problems in October 2024, instead of immediately closing my account, the operator offered me a 400 PLN free bet. I believe that offering a bonus to a player who explicitly declares a gambling problem is inconsistent with Responsible Gambling principles.
The account was not closed immediately and was only blocked after I sent multiple follow-up emails.
In my view, from the moment of my October 2024 message clearly stating that I have a gambling problem and requesting account closure, the operator should have:
- Immediately implemented self-exclusion,
- Refrained from offering any promotions or bonuses,
- Treated the case as urgent under Responsible Gambling policy.
The internal distinction between different email addresses (support@ vs block@) should not affect the operator’s responsibility to protect a vulnerable player. It is the same company and the same player account.
I respectfully ask you to assess the case primarily based on the October 2024 communication, as this was a clear and explicit declaration of gambling-related harm and a direct request for account closure.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards,
Automatski prevedeno: