Zdravo Atila,
Hvala vam na odgovoru.
Ne, trenutno nemam pristup svom Mond Casino nalogu. Koliko ja razumem, nalog je trenutno zatvoren/blokiran.
Takođe bih želeo da razjasnim nešto važno: kategorično se ne slažem sa tvrdnjom da je primarni problem bilo nezadovoljstvo nivoom dobitaka. To nije moja žalba.
Moja žalba je da sam više puta tražio od Mond Casino trajno zatvaranje/neotvaranje, a kazino nije pravilno tretirao ovo kao pitanje odgovornog kockanja/samoisključenja.
Razumem da Casino Guru može zahtevati eksplicitne formulacije vezane za kockanje kako bi zatražio povraćaj novca. Međutim, smatram da moja komunikacija mora biti procenjena u celini i u kontekstu.
Ključna stvar je da nisam samo tražio privremenu pauzu. Više puta sam koristio formulacije poput:
- „Možete li trajno zatvoriti račun?"
- „Možete li sada trajno obrisati ovaj nalog?"
-„Ne želim da ga deaktiviram na 24 sata. Želim da ga trajno isključim."
- trajno zatvaranje bez mogućnosti ponovnog otvaranja
-bez daljeg pristupa njihovim uslugama
U sopstvenoj politici odgovornog igranja kazina Mond, samoisključenje se može zahtevati „na određeni vremenski period ili zauvek". Stoga ne razumem zašto se ponovljeni zahtevi za trajno isključivanje/bez ponovnog otvaranja ne bi tretirali kao zahtev za samoisključenje ili odgovorno igranje.
Takođe osporavam tvrdnju Mond Casino-a da su poslali dodatne imejlove u kojima su zahtevali dalju akciju od mene. Nisam primio te dodatne imejlove, a kada sam ih zamolio da dostave dokaz za to, prestali su da odgovaraju.
Možete li, molim vas, razjasniti koju vrstu formulacije Kazino Guru smatra dovoljnim dokazom o zabrinutosti u vezi sa kockanjem.
Hvala unapred.
Hello Attila,
Thank you for your reply.
No, I do not currently have access to my Mond Casino account. To my understanding, the account is currently closed/blocked.
I would also like to clarify something important: I strongly disagree with the statement that the primary issue was dissatisfaction with the level of winnings. That is not my complaint.
My complaint is that I repeatedly asked Mond Casino for permanent closure/no reopening, and the casino did not properly treat this as a responsible gambling/self-exclusion matter.
I understand that Casino Guru may require explicit gambling-related wording in order to request a refund. However, I believe my communication must be assessed as a whole and in context.
The key point is that I did not simply ask for a temporary break. I repeatedly used wording such as:
-"Could you close account permanently?"
-"Can you delete this account permanently now?"
-"I don't want to deactivate it for 24 hours. I want permanently out."
-permanent closure with no option to reopen
-no further access to their services
In Mond Casino’s own Responsible Gaming policy, self-exclusion can be requested "for a certain period of time or forever". I therefore do not understand why repeated requests to be permanently out/no reopening would not be treated as a self-exclusion or responsible gambling request.
I also dispute Mond Casino’s claim that they sent follow-up emails requiring further action from me. I did not receive those follow-up emails, and when I asked them to provide proof of this, they stopped replying.
Could you please clarify exactly what type of wording Casino Guru considers sufficient evidence of gambling concerns?
Thanks in advance.
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno: