Zdravo Kristina,
Hvala vam na poruci i pažnji koju ste posvetili mojoj žalbi.
Želeo bih da snažno razjasnim da sam eksplicitno tražio od MyEmpire samoisključenje, mnogo puta, ne samo zbog slučajnog zatvaranja naloga. Objasnio sam da sam potrošio previše novca i da me treba isključiti sa platforme. Samo ta poruka je trebalo da pokrene trenutne protokole za odgovorno kockanje.
Prema Politici odgovornog igranja za licencirane operatere koju je izdala Uprava za igre na sreću Kurasaa (verzija 1.0, 17. april 2025), zahtev koji sam podneo trebalo je da bude više nego dovoljan za delovanje. Neodgovaranje operatera na odgovarajući način predstavlja ozbiljno kršenje te politike.
Evo ključnih odeljaka politike koji se primenjuju:
Neposredna obrada zahteva za samoisključenje (Odeljak 9.2.3.1 – Akcije i implementacija):
- Samoisključenje mora biti sprovedeno odmah po zahtevu.
- Odlaganje ili komplikovanje procesa aktivacije je izričito zabranjeno.
- Svako klađenje između zahteva i izvršenja mora biti poništeno i vraćeno.
Bez bonusa, podsticaja ili marketinga nakon zahteva za samoisključenje (Odeljak 9.2.3.2 – Marketing i komunikacije)
- Nakon podnošenja zahteva za samoisključenje, ne mogu se nuditi bonusi, promocije ili oglašavanje.
- Ipak, više puta su mi nuđeni bonusi (150, 500, 200 dolara itd.) čak i nakon višestrukih zahteva za isključenje.
Samoisključenje mora biti neopozivo tokom određenog trajanja (Odeljak 9.2.4 – Protokol o reaktivaciji i post-hlađenju)
- Samoisključenje se ne može poništiti slučajno ili na inicijativu kazina.
- Uprkos tome, ponovo su mi otvorili nalog 6 dana nakon prvog isključenja i ponovo bez zahteva u januaru 2025.
Prepoznavanje štetnosti kockanja bez eksplicitnog pominjanja „zavisnosti" (Odeljak 8.1 – Ključni faktori praćenja i Odeljak 7 – Dužnost brige)
- Igrači koji pokazuju znake štete (kao što su višestruki zahtevi za samoisključenje, jezik finansijskih problema) moraju biti zaštićeni, bez obzira na to da li se koristi reč „zavisnost".
- Više puta sam pisao o „previše trošenju", „gubljenju svega" i „propasti", što su jasni indikatori rizika.
Obaveza održavanja funkcionalnog odeljka za odgovorno igranje (Odeljak 6.1 – Odeljak za odgovorno igranje)
- Igrači moraju biti u mogućnosti da se lako samoisključe bez potrebe za dugim imejlovima.
Odgovornost je operatera da samoisključenje učini dostupnim, trenutnim i efikasnim. Zakazali su na svakom koraku.
Sve je to dobro napisano u Politici odgovornog kockanja za licencirane operatere kompanije Curacao Egaming:
https://gamingcontrol.spin-cdn.com/media/online_gaming/20250428_cga_responsible_gaming_polici_17_april_2025_final.pdf
Uzimajući u obzir ovaj kontekst, s poštovanjem molim da Casino Guru u potpunosti razmotri ova jasna kršenja pravila i pozove operatera na odgovornost. Moj zahtev je podnet u dobroj veri. Njihova neaktivnost je direktno doprinela daljim gubicima koji nikada nisu smeli da se dogode.
Hvala vam na podršci i što ozbiljno shvatate propise Kurasaoa.
Hi Kristina,
Thank you for your message and your attention to my complaint.
I would like to strongly clarify that I explicitly asked MyEmpire for self-exclusion, many times, not just for a casual account closure. I explained I had spent too much money, and I needed to be excluded from the platform. That message alone should have triggered immediate Responsible Gambling protocols.
According to the Responsible Gaming Policy for Licensed Operators issued by the Curaçao Gaming Authority (Version 1.0, 17 April 2025), the request I made should have been more than sufficient for action. The operator’s failure to respond appropriately is a serious breach of that policy.
Here are the key policy sections that apply:
Immediate Processing of Self-Exclusion Requests (Section 9.2.3.1 – Actions and Implementation):
- Self-exclusion must be enforced immediately upon request.
- Delaying or complicating the activation process is explicitly prohibited.
- Any wagering between the request and enforcement must be voided and refunded.
No Bonuses, Incentives, or Marketing After Self-Exclusion Request (Section 9.2.3.2 – Marketing and Communications)
- No bonuses, promotions, or advertising may be offered after a self-exclusion request is made.
- Yet I was repeatedly offered bonuses ($150, $500, $200, etc.) even after multiple exclusion requests.
Self-Exclusion Must Be Irrevocable for the Set Duration (Section 9.2.4 – Reactivation and Post-Cooling Off Protocol)
- A self-exclusion cannot be undone casually or at the casino’s initiative.
- Despite this, they reopened my account 6 days after the first exclusion and again without request in January 2025.
Recognition of Gambling Harm Without Explicit Mention of "Addiction" (Section 8.1 – Key Monitoring Factors & Section 7 – Duty of Care)
- Players showing signs of harm (like multiple self-exclusion requests, financial distress language) must be protected, regardless of whether the word "addiction" is used.
- I wrote repeatedly about "spending too much," "losing everything," and "being ruined," which are clear risk indicators.
Obligation to Maintain a Functional Responsible Gaming Section (Section 6.1 – Responsible Gaming Section)
- Players must be able to easily self-exclude without needing lengthy back-and-forth emails.
It is the operator’s responsibility to make self-exclusion accessible, immediate, and effective. They failed at every step.
It is all well written in the Curacao Egaming Responsible Gambling Policy for Licensed Operators:
https://gamingcontrol.spin-cdn.com/media/online_gaming/20250428_cga_responsible_gaming_policy_17_april_2025_final.pdf
Given this context, I respectfully ask that Casino Guru fully consider these clear policy violations and hold the operator accountable. My request was made in good faith. Their inaction directly contributed to further losses that should never have happened.
Thank you for your support and for taking Curaçao’s regulations seriously.
Automatski prevedeno: