The player from Hamburg was dissatisfied after the casino was unable to process a withdrawal to the same credit card used for deposits due to technical reasons. Instead, the casino offered a bank transfer, which the player considered unprofessional, particularly as a long-standing customer. The player also expressed frustration over the lack of communication during the following days. During the investigation, it was established that the withdrawal had been declined by the payment service provider due to merchant deposit limits rather than by the casino itself. The funds were promptly returned to the player's account, and an alternative withdrawal method was offered. However, the player chose to continue gambling with the returned balance and subsequently lost it. Although the player remained dissatisfied with the outcome, the Complaints Team concluded that the casino had acted in good faith. The complaint was marked as resolved following the player's confirmation.
Igrač iz Hamburga bio je nezadovoljan nakon što kazino nije mogao da obradi isplatu na istu kreditnu karticu koja je korišćena za depozite iz tehničkih razloga. Umesto toga, kazino je ponudio bankovni transfer, što je igrač smatrao neprofesionalnim, posebno kao dugogodišnji kupac. Igrač je takođe izrazio frustraciju zbog nedostatka komunikacije tokom narednih dana. Tokom istrage, utvrđeno je da je isplatu odbio dobavljač platnih usluga zbog ograničenja depozita trgovaca, a ne sam kazino. Sredstva su odmah vraćena na igračev račun, a ponuđen je i alternativni način isplate. Međutim, igrač je odlučio da nastavi kockanje sa vraćenim stanjem i potom ga je izgubio. Iako je igrač ostao nezadovoljan ishodom, Tim za žalbe je zaključio da je kazino postupio u dobroj veri. Žalba je označena kao rešena nakon igračeve potvrde.