Zdravo.
Želim da podnesem žalbu u vezi sa odlukom kompanije Pledoo da poništi moje opklade, konfiskuje moje dobitke i zatvori moj nalog na osnovu navodnog dupliranog naloga.
Potvrđujem da sam prethodno kreirao/la nalog na Pledoo-u.
Međutim,
Potpuno sam zaboravio na taj nalog i nisam bio svestan da još uvek postoji kada sam se ponovo registrovao. Nisam namerno kreirao drugi nalog da bih zaobišao pravila operatera ili stekao bilo kakvu nepravednu prednost.
Treba uzeti u obzir nekoliko važnih činjenica:
Nisam zatražio/la niti primio/la bilo kakav bonus dobrodošlice ili promotivnu ponudu na predmetnom nalogu.
Nisam koristio više naloga da bih zloupotrebio bonuse, zaobišao ograničenja depozita, samoisključio ili bilo koje mere odgovornog igranja.
Uplatio sam 3.000 švedskih kruna koristeći svoja sredstva.
Pledoo je prihvatio moju registraciju, prihvatio moj depozit i dozvolio mi da se kockam bez ikakvog upozorenja da je otkriven duplikat naloga.
Tek nakon što sam zatražio povlačenje približno 30.000 švedskih kruna, Pledoo je identifikovao navodni dupli račun i konfiskovao sva sredstva.
Operator me je obavestio da je dupliranje zasnovano na mom imenu, prezimenu i lozinki. Međutim, nikada nisu identifikovali navodni originalni nalog, pružili bilo kakav dokaz o zloupotrebi, niti objasnili kako sam stekao nepravednu prednost.
Politika CGA o odgovornom igranju odnosi se na višestruke naloge u kontekstu sprečavanja zaobilaženja mera odgovornog igranja, kao što su samoisključenje i ograničenja depozita ili gubitka. Nijedna od ovih okolnosti se ne odnosi na moj slučaj. Ne postoji tvrdnja da sam počinio prevaru, zloupotrebio bonuse, pokušao da zaobiđem zaštitu odgovornog igranja ili koristio lažne identitetske podatke.
Uslovi korišćenja usluge Pledoo navode da operater može poništiti opklade napravljene sa dupliranog naloga. Ova formulacija daje operateru diskreciono pravo i ne zahteva automatsku konfiskaciju u svakom slučaju. S poštovanjem smatram da ovo diskreciono pravo treba koristiti pravedno i srazmerno.
U mom slučaju, nema dokaza da sam postupio nepošteno ili da sam pokušao da steknem nepravednu prednost. Jednostavno sam registrovao nalog, uplatio svoj novac i igrao igre kojima mi je operater slobodno dozvolio pristup. Da su sistemi operatera bili sposobni da otkriju duple naloge, mogli su da spreče registraciju ili suspenduju nalog pre nego što prihvate moje depozite i dozvole kockarske aktivnosti.
Umesto toga, operater je prihvatio moj posao, dozvolio sve opklade i oslanjao se na pravilo duplih naloga tek nakon što sam pobedio.
Verujem da ovo pokreće ozbiljnu zabrinutost u vezi sa pravičnošću i doslednom primenom Uslova i odredbi operatera.
Štaviše, Pledoo me je pismeno obavestio da će mi poslednji depozit biti vraćen:
Štaviše, Pledoo me je pismeno obavestio da će mi poslednji depozit biti vraćen:
„Vaši depoziti će biti vraćeni na poslednji korišćeni način plaćanja."
Do danas, ovaj povraćaj novca nije primljen.
S poštovanjem molim da se ispita da li je Pleduova odluka da mi oduzme dobitke bila pravedna, srazmerna i u skladu sa obavezama operatera u vezi sa licencom.
Takođe molim Pledua da objasni:
Koji tačno nalog tvrde da je moj originalni nalog.
Koji dokazi postoje da sam namerno kreirao dupli nalog u nepravilnu svrhu?
Kakvu nepravednu prednost veruju da sam stekao.
Zašto je konfiskacija svih dobitaka smatrana srazmernom uprkos odsustvu zloupotrebe bonusa, prevare ili bilo kakvog pokušaja zaobilaženja mera odgovornog igranja.
Zašto moj obećani povraćaj depozita nije obrađen.
Sve vreme sam postupao u dobroj veri. Nisam namerno kršio pravila, nisam tražio nikakvu nepravednu prednost i smatram da je oduzimanje mog dobitka pod ovim okolnostima nesrazmerno i u skladu sa principima pravičnosti koji se očekuju od licenciranog operatera.
Vidim da je više igrača bilo u ovoj situaciji.
ali da sam znao da već imam nalog, jednostavno bih koristio taj nalog.
ali još uvek ne znam taj nalog. I moji podaci su bili u redu dok sam kreirao nalog.
Mislim da je ovo zaista nepravedno.
Ako čekaju bezbednosnu proveru dok igrači ne izvrše isplatu, kako onda mogu sprečiti dupliranje naloga zbog pravila licenciranja i odgovornog igranja?
Želim da Pledoo promeni svoju odluku jer prihvataju da sam kreirao nalog, a da nisam znao da postoji još neki.
Hi.
I wish to submit a complaint regarding Pledoo’s decision to void my bets, confiscate my winnings, and close my account based on an alleged duplicate account.
I acknowledge that I had previously created an account with Pledoo.
However,
I had completely forgotten about that account and was unaware that it still existed when I registered again. I did not intentionally create a second account to circumvent the operator’s rules or gain any unfair advantage.
Several important facts should be considered:
I did not claim or receive any welcome bonus or promotional offer on the account in question.
I did not use multiple accounts to abuse bonuses, circumvent deposit limits, self-exclusion, or any Responsible Gaming measures.
I deposited SEK 3,000 using my own funds.
Pledoo accepted my registration, accepted my deposit, and allowed me to gamble without any warning that a duplicate account had been detected.
only after I requested a withdrawal of approximately SEK 30,000 did Pledoo identify the alleged duplicate account and confiscate all funds.
The operator informed me that the duplication was based on my first name, last name, and password. However, they have never identified the alleged original account, provided any evidence of misconduct, or explained how I obtained an unfair advantage.
The CGA Responsible Gaming Policy refers to multiple accounts in the context of preventing the circumvention of Responsible Gaming measures, such as self-exclusion and deposit or loss limits. None of these circumstances apply in my case. There is no allegation that I committed fraud, engaged in bonus abuse, attempted to bypass Responsible Gaming protections, or used false identity details.
Pledoo’s Terms and Conditions state that the operator may void bets made from a duplicate account. This wording gives the operator discretion and does not require automatic confiscation in every case. I respectfully submit that this discretion should be exercised fairly and proportionately.
In my case, there is no evidence that I acted dishonestly or sought to gain an unfair advantage. I simply registered an account, deposited my own money, and played games that the operator freely allowed me to access. If the operator’s systems were capable of detecting duplicate accounts, they could have prevented the registration or suspended the account before accepting my deposits and allowing gambling activity.
Instead, the operator accepted my business, allowed all wagers to take place, and only relied on the duplicate account rule after I had won.
I believe this raises serious concerns regarding fairness and the consistent application of the operator’s Terms and Conditions.
Furthermore, Pledoo informed me in writing that my last deposit would be refunded:
Furthermore, Pledoo informed me in writing that my last deposit would be refunded:
"Your deposits will be refunded to the last payment method used."
To date, this refund has not been received.
I respectfully request a investigate whether Pledoo’s decision to confiscate my winnings was fair, proportionate, and consistent with the operator’s licence obligations.
I also request Pledoo to explain:
Which specific account they claim is my original account.
What evidence exists that I intentionally created a duplicate account for an improper purpose.
What unfair advantage they believe I obtained.
Why confiscation of all winnings was considered proportionate despite the absence of bonus abuse, fraud, or any attempt to circumvent Responsible Gaming measures.
Why my promised deposit refund has not been processed.
I acted in good faith throughout. I did not intentionally breach the rules, I did not seek any unfair advantage, and I believe confiscating my winnings under these circumstances is disproportionate and inconsistent with the principles of fairness expected from a licensed operator.
i can see that more players has been in this situation.
but if i knew i had an account already, i was just gonna use that account.
but i still dont know that account. And my details was fine while created the account.
i think this is really unfair.
if they wait for security check until players made withdrawal, how can they then prevent duplicate accounts due to license rules and responsible gaming?
I want pledoo to change their desicion as they accept me created an account without knowing there was any other existing.
Automatski prevedeno: