Dragi Petre,
Hvala vam što nastavljate da pratite moju žalbu.
Pažljivo sam pročitao najnoviji odgovor RakeBit-a i moram reći da je duboko nezadovoljavajući — ne samo po sadržaju, već i po logici.
Njihov odgovor jednostavno ponavlja opšte uslove i odredbe, bez predstavljanja bilo kakvih konkretnih dokaza ili čak objašnjenja šta sam tačno pogrešno uradio. Ovaj pristup deluje kao da nekome kažete:
„Ići ćeš u zatvor zato što postoje zakoni. Evo ti knjiga zakona — sam pronađi svoj zločin."
Dragi Petre,
Hvala vam što nastavljate da pratite moju žalbu.
Pažljivo sam pročitao najnoviji odgovor RakeBit-a i moram reći da je duboko nezadovoljavajući — ne samo po sadržaju, već i po logici.
Njihov odgovor jednostavno ponavlja opšte uslove i odredbe, bez predstavljanja bilo kakvih konkretnih dokaza ili čak objašnjenja šta sam tačno pogrešno uradio. Ovaj pristup deluje kao da nekome kažete:
„Ići ćeš u zatvor zato što postoje zakoni. Evo ti knjiga zakona — sam pronađi svoj zločin."
Ovo je logička greška i skretanje pažnje. Ako sam zaista počinio bilo kakvo nepravilno delo, trebalo bi da budu u stanju da jasno kažu:
Šta je tačno bilo sumnjivo?
Koja je akcija izazvala zabranu?
Kada se to dogodilo i kako?
Umesto toga, kriju se iza nejasnih formulacija politike — što, zapravo, samo dokazuje da nemaju stvarne slučajeve ili dokaze. Čini se kao da traže razlog nakon što su uzeli novac.
Nadao sam se maloj transparentnosti i osnovnom poštovanju kao mušterija. Ali njihovo odbijanje da bilo šta dalje objasne ne samo da krši pravičnost, već otkriva i njihovu nameru da zatvore vrata bez ikakve odgovornosti.
Petre, duboko cenim tvoju podršku i vreme — ali moram te iskreno pitati:
Na osnovu vašeg iskustva, kolika je verovatnoća da će ovaj slučaj biti rešen u moju korist?
Razumem da možda ne kontrolišete njihovu odluku, ali vaš uvid bi mi pomogao da postavim svoja očekivanja i odlučim koliko daleko treba da idem javno i legalno.
Hvala vam još jednom na vašem trudu i pravednosti.
S poštovanjem,
Dear Peter,
Thank you for continuing to follow up on my complaint.
I’ve carefully read RakeBit’s most recent response, and I must say it is deeply unsatisfying — not only in content, but also in logic.
Their reply simply restates general terms and conditions, without presenting any specific evidence or even explaining what exactly I did wrong. This approach feels like telling someone:
"You’re going to jail because laws exist. Here’s a book of laws — find your crime yourself."
Dear Peter,
Thank you for continuing to follow up on my complaint.
I’ve carefully read RakeBit’s most recent response, and I must say it is deeply unsatisfying — not only in content, but also in logic.
Their reply simply restates general terms and conditions, without presenting any specific evidence or even explaining what exactly I did wrong. This approach feels like telling someone:
"You’re going to jail because laws exist. Here’s a book of laws — find your crime yourself."
This is a logical fallacy and a deflection. If I truly committed any wrongdoing, they should be able to say clearly:
What exactly was suspicious?
What action triggered the ban?
When did it happen and how?
Instead, they hide behind vague policy language — which, in fact, only proves that they have no actual case or evidence. It feels like they are looking for a reason after taking the money.
I was hoping for some transparency and basic respect as a customer. But their refusal to explain anything further not only violates fairness, it reveals their intention to shut the door without accountability.
Peter, I deeply appreciate your support and time — but I must ask you honestly:
Based on your experience, how likely is it that this case will be resolved in my favor?
I understand you may not control their decision, but your insight would help me set my expectations and decide how far I need to take this publicly and legally.
Thank you again for your work and fairness.
Sincerely,
Automatski prevedeno: