Zdravo Natalija i tim CasinoGuru,
Hvala vam još jednom na pomoći. Želeo bih da pružim detaljno pojašnjenje u vezi sa klauzulom o uslovima i odredbama koju ste pomenuli i objasnim zašto se ona ne bi trebalo primenjivati u mom slučaju.
📧 Vremenski okvir i namera imejla
U 19:30 sam poslao imejl sa zahtevom za deaktivaciju naloga i pristup podacima o mom nalogu u skladu sa članom 15 GDPR-a.
U istoj poruci nisam zahtevao trenutno zatvaranje niti sam pomenuo gubitak sredstava.
Kasnije te večeri, u 01:36, poslao sam drugi imejl u kojem je stajalo:
„Zatvori nakon povlačenja kursa"
(došlo je do male greške u kucanju — „curs" umesto „course" — ali namera je 100% jasna i razumljiva)
Dakle, u roku od 6 sati, eksplicitno sam pojasnio da račun treba zatvoriti tek nakon što se moje isplate obrade.
🏦 Status povlačenja
Pokrenuo sam isplatu od 500 evra odmah nakon što sam osvojio ukupno 1.601 evra.
Pošto kazino dozvoljava samo jedno povlačenje istovremeno, bio sam u procesu povlačenja celog iznosa u koracima.
Ubrzo nakon ovih imejlova, moj račun je zatvoren bez upozorenja — i to sa još uvek neplaćenih 1.101 evra.
Uprkos tome, kazino je nastavio i isplatio povlačenje od 500 evra — što dokazuje:
Moj nalog je bio u dobrom stanju
Povlačenje je bilo validno
Nije bilo kršenja uslova ili problema sa KYC-om
📜 O klauzuli o uslovima i odredbama (3.7 – Zaključenje sa preostalim iznosom)
Svestan sam klauzule koja kaže:
„Možete zatvoriti svoj račun samo ako na njemu nema preostalog duga ili ako nemate mogućnost isplate. U suprotnom, sredstva će biti poništena."
Ali ova klauzula se ovde ne primenjuje, jer:
Nisam tražio trenutno zatvaranje.
Izričito sam im naložio da sačekaju dok se povlačenje ne završi.
Prema njihovoj sopstvenoj klauzuli, nisu trebali uopšte da zatvore moj račun dok je povlačenje sredstava bilo u toku — što su upravo i uradili.
Ako je neko prekršio klauzulu, to je bio kazino, a ne ja.
🔐 Rezime
Postupio sam jasno, u dobroj veri i pružio sam daljnje informacije u roku od nekoliko sati.
Kazino je zatvorio moj račun sa još uvek nerešenim stanjem, ignorišući moje stanje i sopstvenu politiku.
Platili su 500 evra, čime su dokazali da je preostali iznos validan.
Sada tražim samo ono što je zakonski moje: preostalih 1.101 evro.
Već sam prosledio dokaze iz imejla natalia.b@casino.guru kako je zatraženo. Molim vas, obavestite me ako je potrebno još nešto.
Hvala vam još jednom na kontinuiranoj podršci u rešavanju ovog spora.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Robin S*****
Hello Natalia and CasinoGuru team,
Thank you again for your assistance. I’d like to provide a detailed clarification to address the T&C clause you referenced and explain why it should not apply to my case.
📧 Email Timeline and Intent
At 19:30, I sent an email requesting account deactivation and access to my account data under Article 15 GDPR.
In that same message, I did not request immediate closure and made no mention of forfeiting funds.
Later that evening, at 01:36, I sent a second email stating:
"Close after withdrawal of course"
(there was a small typo — "curs" instead of "course" — but the intent is 100% clear and understandable)
So, within 6 hours, I explicitly clarified that the account should only be closed after my withdrawals was processed.
🏦 Withdrawal Status
I initiated a €500 withdrawal immediately after winning a total of €1,601.
Since the casino only allows one withdrawal at a time, I was in the process of withdrawing the full amount in steps.
Shortly after these emails, my account was closed without warning — and with €1,101 still unpaid.
Despite this, the casino went ahead and paid the €500 withdrawal — which proves:
My account was in good standing
The withdrawal was valid
There were no breaches of terms or KYC issues
📜 On the T&C Clause (3.7 – Closure with Balance)
I am aware of the clause that states:
"You may only close your account if it has no remaining balance or pending withdrawal. Otherwise, funds will be voided."
But this clause does not apply here, because:
I did not request immediate closure.
I explicitly instructed them to wait until the withdrawal was completed.
According to their own clause, they should not have closed my account at all while a withdrawal was pending — which is exactly what they did.
If anyone violated the clause, it was the casino, not me.
🔐 Summary
I acted clearly, in good faith, and provided follow-up within hours.
The casino closed my account with a balance still pending, ignoring my condition and their own policy.
They paid €500, proving the balance was valid.
I am now only requesting what is lawfully mine: the remaining €1,101.
I have already forwarded the email evidence to natalia.b@casino.guru as requested. Please let me know if anything else is needed.
Thank you again for your continued support in resolving this dispute.
Best regards,
Robin S*****
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: