Dana 18. maja 2026. godine, zatražio sam zatvaranje mog Robocat naloga.
Istog dana, tim za podršku kazina je putem e-pošte potvrdio da je moj nalog uspešno zatvoren.
Međutim, nakon što sam primio ovu potvrdu, otkrio sam da je moj nalog i dalje u potpunosti dostupan. Mogao sam da se prijavim, uplatim novac i nastavim da igram.
Dana 20. maja 2026. godine, nakon što sam shvatio da je nalog i dalje aktivan i nakon povratka na platformu, poslao sam još jedan imejl tražeći od kazina da ne nastavlja sa zatvaranjem.
Dana 24. maja 2026. godine, poslao sam novi zahtev tražeći da mi se nalog zatvori.
Robocat me je kasnije obavestio da je moj nalog zapravo zatvoren 24. maja 2026. godine.
Glavni problem je što je kazino 18. maja potvrdio da je moj nalog zatvoren, dok je nalog ostao dostupan do 24. maja.
Tokom ovog perioda, nastavio sam da se kockam i pretrpeo sam gubitke od ukupno približno 951 evra.
Zatražio/la sam povraćaj novca jer su se ovi gubici dogodili tokom perioda u kojem sam već bio/la obavešten/a da je moj račun zatvoren.
Kazino je odbio moj zahtev pozivajući se na odeljak 6.6.2 svojih Uslova i odredbi, navodeći da se povraćaj novca ne može izvršiti nakon što su depoziti iskorišćeni za klađenje.
Međutim, moja žalba se ne odnosi samo na gubitke od kockanja. Moja zabrinutost je da je nalog ostao aktivan nakon što je kazino pismeno potvrdio da je zatvoren.
Takođe sam tražio detaljne podatke o nalogu i sesiji. Kazino je pružio izveštaj sa podacima koji sadrži lične podatke, depozite, isplate i rezimee igara, ali nije sadržao:
identifikatori sesija;
detaljne sesije igre;
tačne vremenske oznake pojedinačnih sesija;
informacije koje mi omogućavaju da identifikujem dotične sesije.
Zatražio/la sam ove dodatne detalje, ali ih još nisam dobio/la.
Želeo bih nezavisnu proveru razloga zašto je moj nalog ostao dostupan nakon potvrde o zatvaranju 18. maja i da li gubici nastali tokom ovog perioda treba da ostanu u potpunosti moja odgovornost.
Priložio sam sve relevantne imejlove i dokumente.
On 18 May 2026, I requested the closure of my Robocat account.
On the same day, the casino support team confirmed by email that my account had been successfully closed.
However, after receiving this confirmation, I discovered that my account was still fully accessible. I was able to log in, deposit money and continue playing.
On 20 May 2026, after realizing that the account was still active and after returning to the platform, I sent another email asking the casino not to proceed with the closure.
On 24 May 2026, I sent a new request asking for my account to be closed.
Robocat later informed me that my account had actually been closed on 24 May 2026.
The main issue is that the casino confirmed on 18 May that my account had been closed, while the account remained accessible until 24 May.
During this period, I continued gambling and incurred losses totaling approximately €951.
I requested a refund because these losses occurred during a period in which I had already been informed that my account had been closed.
The casino refused my request by referring to section 6.6.2 of their Terms and Conditions, stating that no refund can be made once deposits have been used for betting.
However, my complaint is not simply about gambling losses. My concern is that the account remained active after the casino had confirmed in writing that it had been closed.
I also requested detailed account and session data. The casino provided a data report containing personal information, deposits, withdrawals and game summaries, but it did not contain:
session identifiers;
detailed game sessions;
exact timestamps of individual sessions;
information allowing me to identify the sessions concerned.
I have requested these additional details but have not yet received them.
I would like an independent review of why my account remained accessible after the closure confirmation of 18 May and whether the losses incurred during this period should remain entirely my responsibility.
I have attached all relevant emails and documents.
Automatski prevedeno: